SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF, Goldenberg RL. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 164175.
  • 2
    Berghella V, Tolosa JE, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Bolognese RJ, Wapner RJ. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 723730.
  • 3
    Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks' gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 902907.
  • 4
    Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 312317.
  • 5
    Brieger GM, Ning XH, Dawkins RR, Ying KQ, Weng C, Chang AM, Haines CJ. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical dynamics during the third trimester of normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 118122.
  • 6
    Hasegawa I, Tanaka K, Takahashi K, Tanaka T, Aoki K, Torii Y, Okai T, Saji F, Takahashi T, Sato K, Fujimura M, Ogawa Y. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical assessment for the prediction of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Med 1996; 5: 305309.
  • 7
    Kushnir O, Vigil DA, Izquierdo L, Schiff M, Curet LB. Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 991993.
  • 8
    Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, Roberts JM. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 567572.
  • 9
    Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, Ness A, Baxter JK. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 311317.
  • 10
    Bloechle M, Halle H, Bollmann R. [Vaginal ultrasound cervix imaging in pregnancy—predictive value of suspicious findings on the subsequent course of pregnancy]. Zentralbl Gynakol 1994; 116: 697705.
  • 11
    Eppel W, Schurz B, Frigo P, Reinold E. [Vaginal ultrasound studies of cervix closure with special reference to parity]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1992; 52: 148151.
  • 12
    Tongsong T, Kamprapanth P, Pitaksakorn J. Cervical length in normal pregnancy as measured by transvaginal sonography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997; 58: 313315.
  • 13
    Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, Hayashi RH. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 859867.
  • 14
    Smith CV, Anderson JC, Matamoros A, Rayburn WF. Transvaginal sonography of cervical width and length during pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 465467.
  • 15
    Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH. Cervical length at 16–22 weeks' gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 972978.
  • 16
    Rovas L, Sladkevicius P, Strobel E, Valentin L. Reference data representative of normal findings at two-dimensional and three-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 392402.
  • 17
    Robinson HP, Fleming JE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown–rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 702710.
  • 18
    Royston P, Wright EM. How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 3038.
  • 19
    Altman DG, Chitty LS. Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 2934.
  • 20
    Huber PJ. Robust Statistics. Wiley: New York, NY, 1981.
  • 21
    White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 1982; 50: 125.
  • 22
    Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med 1992; 11: 13051319.
  • 23
    Cole TJ, Pan H. LMS ChartMaker light. 1997–2005; Medical Research Council: London, UK.
  • 24
    Wright EM, Royston P. A comparison of statistical methods for age-related references intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 1997; 160: 4769.
  • 25
    Silverwood RJ, Cole TJ. Statistical methods for constructing gestational age-related reference intervals and centile charts for fetal size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 613.
  • 26
    Okitsu O, Mimura T, Nakayama T, Aono T. Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 402409.
  • 27
    Grimes-Dennis J, Berghella V. Cervical length and prediction of preterm delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 191195.
  • 28
    Cook CM, Ellwood DA. A longitudinal study of the cervix in pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 1618.
  • 29
    Bergelin I, Valentin L. Patterns of normal change in cervical length and width during pregnancy in nulliparous women: a prospective, longitudinal ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 217222.
  • 30
    Kuczmarski R, Ogden C, Guo S. 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: Methods and Development, 2002. Department Of Health And Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, USA.
  • 31
    Biau DJ, Porcher R, Salomon LJ. CUSUM: a tool for ongoing assessment of performance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 252255.
  • 32
    Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Ville Y. Analysis of Z-score distribution for the quality control of fetal ultrasound measurements at 20–24 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 750754.
  • 33
    Cole TJ. The international growth standard for preadolescent and adolescent children: statistical considerations. Food Nutr Bull 2006; 27(4 Suppl Growth Standard): S237S243.