SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Tabor A, Madsen M, Obel E, Philip J, Bang J, Nørgaard-Pedersen B. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet 1986; 1: 12871293.
  • 2
    Smidt-Jensen S, Permin M, Philip J, Lundsteen C, Zachary JM, Fowler SE, Grüning K. Randomised comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 1992; 340: 12371244.
  • 3
    Canadian Collaborative CVS-Amniocentesis Clinical Trial Group. Multicentre randomised clinical trial of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. First report. Lancet 1989; 1: 16.
  • 4
    Rhoads GG, Jackson LG, Schesselman SA, de la Cruz FF, Desnick RJ, Golbus MS, Ledbetter DH, Lubs HA, Mahoney MJ, Pergament E. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 610617.
  • 5
    MRC Working Party on the Evaluation of Chorion Villus Sampling. Medical Research Council European Trial of chorion villus sampling. Lancet 1991; 337: 14911499.
  • 6
    Caughey AB, Hopkins LM, Norton ME. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 612616.
  • 7
    Odibo AO, Gray DL, Dicke JM, Stamilio DM, Macones GA, Crane JP. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 589595.
  • 8
    Eddleman KA, Malone FD, Sullivan L, Dukes K, Berkowitz RL, Kharbutli Y, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock CH, Saade GR, Klugman S, Dugoff L, Craigo SD, Timor-Tritsch IE, Carr SR, Wolfe HM, D'Alton ME. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 10671072.
  • 9
    Snijders RJ, Sundberg K, Holzgreve W, Henry G, Nicolaides KH. Maternal age- and gestation-specific risk for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 167170.
  • 10
    Tongsong T, Wanapirak C, Sirivatanapa P, Piyamongkol W, Sirichotiyakul S, Yampochai A. Amniocentesis-related fetal loss: A cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 6467.
  • 11
    Seeds JW. Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: How safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 608616.
  • 12
    Nicolaides K, Brizot Mde L, Patel F, Snijders R. Comparison of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping at 10–13 weeks' gestation. Lancet 1994; 344: 435439.
  • 13
    Canadian Early and Mid-trimester Amniocentesis Trial (CEMAT) Group. Randomised trial to assess safety and fetal outcome of early and midtrimester amniocentesis. Lancet 1998; 351: 242247.
  • 14
    Mujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 687694.
  • 15
    Alfirevic Z, Sundberg K, Brigham S. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003; Issue (1.):Art. No.: CD003252. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003252.
  • 16
    Hoesli IM, Walter-Goebel I, Tercanli S, Holzgreve W. Spontaneous fetal loss rates in a non-selected population. Am J Med Genet 2001; 100: 106109.
  • 17
    Ekelund CK, Jørgensen FS, Petersen OB, Sundberg K, Tabor A; Danish Fetal Medicine Research Group. Impact of a new national screening policy for Down's syndrome in Denmark: a population based cohort study. BMJ 2008; 337: a2547.
  • 18
    Muller F, Thibaud D, Poloce F, Gelineau MC, Bernard M, Brochet C, Millet C, Réal JY, Dommergues M. Risk of amniocentesis in women screened positive for Down syndrome with second trimester maternal serum markers. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 10361039.
  • 19
    Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt M, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ 2000; 320: 17081712.
  • 20
    Wijnberger LDE, van der Schouw YT, Christiaens GCML. Learning in medicine: chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 241246.
  • 21
    Leschot NJ, Verjaal M, Treffers PE. Risks of midtrimester amniocentesis: assessment in 3,000 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 804807.