SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 2347.
  • 2
    Osmers R. Sonographic evaluation of ovarian masses and its therapeutical implications. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 217222.
  • 3
    Valentin L. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 273283.
  • 4
    Tekay A, Jouppila P. Validity of pulsatility and resistance indices in classification of adnexal tumors with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 338344.
  • 5
    Valentin L, Sladkevicius P, Marsal K. Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumors. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 425433.
  • 6
    Valentin L. Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 338347.
  • 7
    Becker H, Burns PN. Handbook of contrast Echocardiography. LV function and Myocardial Perfusion. Springer Verlag: Heidelberg, 2000; 2526.
  • 8
    Testa AC, Ferrandina G, Fruscella E, Van Holsbeke C, Ferrazzi E, Leone FP, Arduini, Exacoustos C, Bokor D, Scambia G, Timmerman D. The use of contrasted transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of gynecologic diseases: a preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 12671278.
  • 9
    Agati L, Funaro S, Veneroso G, Volponi C, De Maio F, Madonna MP, Fedele F. Non-invasive assessment of myocardial perfusion by intravenous contrast echocardiography: state of the art. Ital Heart J 2001; 2: 403407.
  • 10
    Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 500505.
  • 11
    Rubaltelli L, Corradin S, Dorigo A, Tregnaghi A, Adami F, Rossi CR, Stramare R. Automated quantitative evaluation of lymph node perfusion on contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 977983.
  • 12
    Huang-Wei C, Bleuzen A, Olar M, Portalez D, Roumy J, Trillaud H, Tranquart F. Role of parametric imaging in contrast-enhanced sonography of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. J Clin Ultrasound 2006; 34: 367373.
  • 13
    Sheperd JH. Revised FIGO staging for gynaecological cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 889892.
  • 14
    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959; 22: 719748.
  • 15
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307310.
  • 16
    Li L, Nawar S. Reliability analysis: calculate and compare intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) in SAS. Proceedings of the 20th North East SAS Users Group Congress (NESUG), Statistics and Data Analysis, 2007; 14.
  • 17
    Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ferrazzi E, Ameye L, Konstantinovic ML, Van Calster B, Collins WP, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 87948801.
  • 18
    Valentin L, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Metzger U, Lécuru F, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 438444.
  • 19
    Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271: 389391.
  • 20
    Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271: 703707.
  • 21
    Ordén MR, Jurvelin JS, Kirkinen PP. Kinetics of a US contrast agent in benign and malignant adnexal tumors. Radiology 2003; 226: 405410.
  • 22
    Fleischer AC, Lyshchik A, Jones HW Jr, Crispens M, Loveless M, Andreotti RF, Williams PK, Fishman DA. Contrast-enhanced transvaginal sonography of benign versus malignant ovarian masses: preliminary findings. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 10111018.
  • 23
    Marret H, Sauget S, Giraudeau B, Brewer M, Ranger-Moore J, Body G, Tranquart F. Contrast-enhanced sonography helps in discrimination of benign from malignant adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 16291639.
  • 24
    Piscaglia F, Bolondi L; Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB) Study Group on Ultrasound Contrast Agent. The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23 188 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 13691375.
  • 25
    Testa AC, Timmerman D, Exacoustos C, Fruscella E, Van Holsbeke C, Bokor D, Arduini D, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. The role of CnTI-SonoVue in the diagnosis of ovarian masses with papillary projections: a preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 512516.