SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS, Rubin A, Hill M, O'Donnell R, Shulman S. Prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet 2000; 94: 912.
  • 2
    Ashton D, Amin HK, Richart RM, Neuwirth RS. The incidence of asymptomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 2830.
  • 3
    Acien P. Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 13721376.
  • 4
    Stampe Sorensen S. Estimated prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 441445.
  • 5
    Stray-Pedersen B, Stray-Pedersen S. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 140146.
  • 6
    Raga F, Bauset C, Remohí J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simón C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 22772281.
  • 7
    Makino T, Hara T, Oka C, Toyoshima K, Sugi T, Iwasaki K, Umeuchi M, Iizuka R. Survey of 1120 Japanese women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992; 44: 123130.
  • 8
    Clifford K, Rai R, Watson H, Reagan L. An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 13281332.
  • 9
    The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal obstruction, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 944955.
  • 10
    Fedele L, Dorta M, Brioschi D, Massari C, Candiani GB. Magnetic resonance evaluation of double uteri. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 844847.
  • 11
    Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros RK Jr, Hill EC. Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1990; 176: 715720.
  • 12
    Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 1992; 183: 795800.
  • 13
    Fischetti SG, Politi G, Lomeo E, Garozzo G. Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of Mullerian duct anomalies. Radiol Med 1995; 89: 105111.
  • 14
    Deutch TD, Abuhamad AZ. The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 413423.
  • 15
    Troiano R, McCarthy S. Müllerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004; 233: 1934.
  • 16
    Woelfer B, Salim R, Banerjee S, Elson J, Regan L, Jurkovic D. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 10991103.
  • 17
    Syed I, Hussain H, Weadock W, Ellis J. Uterus, Mullerian duct abnormalities. eMedicine. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/405335-overview [Accessed 20 February 2009].
  • 18
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159174.
  • 19
    Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003; 228: 303308.
  • 20
    Raine-Fenning N, Fleischer AC. Clarifying the role of three-dimensional transvaginal sonography in reproductive medicine: an evidence-based appraisal. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 2005; 2: 10.
  • 21
    Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 578582.
  • 22
    Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Tsymbal T, Strok I. Three-dimensional inversion rendering: a new sonographic technique and its use in gynecology. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 681688.
  • 23
    Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 233237.
  • 24
    Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, Osborne NG. Congenital Mullerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 523528.
  • 25
    Wu MH, Hsu CC, Huang KE. Detection of congenital müllerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1997; 25: 487492.
  • 26
    Mohamed M, Momtaz MD, Alaa N, Ebrashy MD, Ayman A, Marzouk MD. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity. MEFS Journal 2007; 12: 4146.
  • 27
    Ghi T, Casadio P, Kuleva M, Perrone AM, Savelli L, Gianchi S, Pelusi C, Pelusi G. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 808813.
  • 28
    Alcázar JL. Three-dimensional ultrasound in gynecology: current status and future perspectives. Curr Womens Health Rev 2005; 1: 114.
  • 29
    Salim R, Regan B, Woelfer B, Backos M, Jurkovic D. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 162166.