SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Genest DR, Williams MA, Greene MF. Estimating the time of death in stillborn fetuses: I. Histologic evaluation of fetal organs; an autopsy study of 150 stillborns. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 575584.
  • 2
    Genest DR. Estimating the time of death in stillborn fetuses: II. Histologic evaluation of the placenta; a study of 71 stillborns. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 585592.
  • 3
    Genest DR, Singer DB. Estimating the time of death in stillborn fetuses: III. External fetal examination; a study of 86 stillborns. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 593600.
  • 4
    Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Lundsteen C. High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical cytogenetics. J Med Genet 2001; 38: 740744.
  • 5
    Lee C, Iafrate AJ, Brothman AR. Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nat Genet 2007; 39: S48S54.
  • 6
    Khan KS, Ter Riet G, Glanville J, Sowden AJ, Kleijnen J. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRD's Guidance for Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews (2nd edn). CRD Report No. 4. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York: York, 2001.
  • 7
    McKibbon A, Eady A, Marks S. Identifying and selecting studies for inclusion. In PDQ Evidence-Based Principles and Practice. BC Decker Inc.: Hamilton, Canada, 1999; 125127.
  • 8
    Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G. Frequency and rate. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: A practical guide (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001; 6773.
  • 9
    Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb AN, Torchia BS, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 11561166.
  • 10
    Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA, Pursley AN, Kang SH, Simovich MJ. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 2939.
  • 11
    Laird NM, Mosteller F. Some statistical methods for combining experimental results. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1990; 6: 530.
  • 12
    Sahoo T, Cheung SW, Ward P, Darilek S, Patel A, del Gaudio D, Kang SH, Lalani SR, Li J, McAdoo S, Burke A, Shaw CA, Stankiewicz P, Chinault AC, Van den Veyver IB, Roa BB, Beaudet AL, Eng CM. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 2006; 8: 719727.
  • 13
    Bi W, Breman AM, Venable SF, Eng PA, Sahoo T, Lu XY. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 943949.
  • 14
    Shaffer LG, Coppinger J, Alliman S, Torchia BA, Theisen A, Ballif BC, Bejjani BA. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 789795.
  • 15
    Rickman L, Fiegler H, Shaw-Smith C, Nash R, Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Ng BL, Scott C, Whittaker J, Adinolfi M, Carter NP, Bobrow M. Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH. J Med Genet 2006; 43: 353361.
  • 16
    De Gregori M, Ciccone R, Magini P, Pramparo T, Gimelli S, Messa J, Novara F, Vetro A, Rossi E, Maraschio P, Bonaglia MC, Anichini C, Ferrero GB, Silengo M, Fazzi E, Zatterale A, Fischetto R, Previderé C, Belli S, Turci A, Calabrese G, Bernardi F, Meneghelli E, Riegel M, Rocchi M, Guerneri S, Lalatta F, Zelante L, Romano C, Fichera M, Mattina T, Arrigo G, Zollino M, Giglio S, Lonardo F, Bonfante A, Ferlini A, Cifuentes F, Van Esch H, Backx L, Schinzel A, Vermeesch JR, Zuffardi O. Cryptic deletions are a common finding in ‘balanced’ reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients. J Med Genet 2007; 44: 750762.
  • 17
    Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, Jacquemont S, Joubert M, David A, Frebourg T, Rival JM. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet 2005; 42: 121128.
  • 18
    Tyreman M, Abbott KM, Willatt LR, Nash R, Lees C, Whittaker J, Simonic I. High resolution array analysis: diagnosing pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings. J Med Genet 2009; 46: 531541.
  • 19
    Kleeman L, Bianchi DW, Shaffer LG, Rorem E, Cowan J, Craigo SD, Tighiouart H, Wilkins-Haug LE. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 12131217.
  • 20
    Vialard F, Molina GD, Leroy B, Quarello E, Escalona A, Le SC. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 25: 277284.
  • 21
    Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2007; 447: 661678.
  • 22
    Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, Listewnik ML, Donahoe PK, Qi Y, Scherer SW, Lee C. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 2004; 36: 949951.
  • 23
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 20082012.
  • 24
    Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, Andrews TD, Fiegler H, Shapero MH, Carson AR, Chen W, Cho EK, Dallaire S, Freeman JL, González JR, Gratacòs M, Huang J, Kalaitzopoulos D, Komura D, MacDonald JR, Marshall CR, Mei R, Montgomery L, Nishimura K, Okamura K, Shen F, Somerville MJ, Tchinda J, Valsesia A, Woodwark C, Yang F, Zhang J, Zerjal T, Zhang J, Armengol L, Conrad DF, Estivill X, Tyler-Smith C, Carter NP, Aburatani H, Lee C, Jones KW, Scherer SW, Hurles ME. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 2006; 444: 444454.
  • 25
    Kang TW, Jeon YJ, Jang E, Kim HJ, Kim JH, Park JL, Lee S, Kim YS, Kim JY, Kim SY. Copy number variations (CNVs) identified in Korean individuals. BMC Genomics 2008; 9: 492.
  • 26
    ACOG Commitee Opinion No. 446: array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 11611163.