SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Beck U. The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992.
  • 2
    Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1990.
  • 3
    Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In: KrimskyS, GoldingD, eds. Social Theories of Risk. Westport, CN: Praeger; 1992, 215228.
  • 4
    Dunlap RE, Xiao C, McCright AM. Politics and environment in America: partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Env Polit 2001, 10: 2348.
  • 5
    Fisher DA. Who are climate change activists in America? Env Law Inst 2008, 38: 1086410867.
  • 6
    Lahsen M. The detection and attribution of conspiracies: the controversy over chapter 8. In: MarcusGE, ed. Paranoia within Reason: A Casebook on Conspiracy As Explanation. Late Editions 6, Cultural Studies for the End of the Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1999, 111136.
  • 7
    Lahsen M. Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: a cultural analysis of a physicist “trio” supporting the conservative backlash against global warming. Glob Environ Change 2008, 18: 204219.
  • 8
    Thompson M, Rayner S. Cultural discourses. In: RaynerS, MaloneEL, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1. Columbus, Ohio: Batelle Press; 1998, 265343.
  • 9
    Kempton W, Boster JS, Hartley JA. Environmental Values in American Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
  • 10
    Kempton W, Craig PP. European perspectives on global climate change. Environment 1993, 35: 1620, 41–45.
  • 11
    Rayner S, Lach D, Ingram H. Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim Change 2005, 69: 197227.
  • 12
    Lemos M, Finan T, Fox RW, Nelson DR, Tucker J. The use of seasonal climate forecasting in policymaking: lessons from Northeast Brazil. Clim Change 2002, 55: 479507.
  • 13
    Brown RGE Jr. Environmental science under siege: Fringe science and the 104th congress [U.S. House of Representatives]. Report, Democratic Caucus of the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives http://www.house.gov/science_democrats/envrpt96.htm. Washington, DC. Available at: http://science.house.gov/publications/caucus_detail.aspx?NewsID=431. (Accessed December 16, 2009). .
  • 14
    Lahsen M. Distrust and participation in international science and environmental decision making: knowledge gaps to overcome. In: PettingerM, ed. The Social Construction of Climate Change. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing; 2007, 173196.
  • 15
    Lahsen M. A science-policy interface in the global South: the politics of carbon sinks and science in Brazil. Clim Change 2009, 97(3): 339372. DOI:10.1007/s10584-009-9610-6.
  • 16
    Carvalho A. Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge. Public Underst Sci 2007, 16: 223243.
  • 17
    Boykoff MaB J. Balance as bias: global warming and the US Prestige Press. Glob Environ Change 2004, 14: 125136.
  • 18
    Boykoff MT. Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995–2004. Clim Change 2008, 86: 111.
  • 19
    Herrick CN, Jamieson D. Junk science and environmental policy: obscuring public debate with misleading discourse. Philos Public Policy Q 2000, 21: 1116.
  • 20
    Kjerulf Petersen L. Changing public discourse on the environment: Danish media coverage of the Rio and Johannesburg UN summits. Environ Polit 2007, 16: 206230.
  • 21
    Zehr S. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 2000, 9: 85103.
  • 22
    Herrick C, Jamieson D. The social construction of acid rain: some implications for science/policy assessment. Glob Environ Change 1995, 5: 105112.
  • 23
    Lahsen M. Transnational locals: Brazilian experiences of the climate regime. In: JasanoffS, Long MartelloM, eds. Earthly Politics, Worldly Knowledge: Local and Global in Environmental Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004, 151172.
  • 24
    Lahsen M. Seductive simulations: uncertainty distribution around climate models. Soc Stud Sci 2005, 35: 895922.
  • 25
    Miller CA. Extending assessment communities to developing countries. Available at: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/gea/pubs. ENRP Discussion Paper E-98-15. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 1998.
  • 26
    Schor T. Uma interpretação da pesquisa na Amazônia: O caso do Experimento de Grande Escala da Biosfera-Atmosfera na Amazônia [dissertation]. PROCAM-Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil, 2005.
  • 27
    Shackley S. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: consensual knowledge and global politics. Glob Environ Change 1997, 7: 7779.
  • 28
    Shackley S. Epistemic lifestyles in climate change modeling. In: MillerCA, EdwardsPN, eds. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001, 107133.
  • 29
    Shackley S, Wynne B. Integrating knowledges for climate change: pyramids, nets and uncertainties. Glob Environ Change 1995, 5: 113126.
  • 30
    Shackley S, Young P, Parkinson S, Wynne B. Uncertainty, complexity and concepts of good science in climate change modelling: are GCMs the best tools? Clima Change 1998, 38: 159205.
  • 31
    Wynne B. Scientific knowledge and the global environment. In: RedcliftMJ, BentonT, eds. Social Theory and the Global Environment. London and New York: Routledge; 1994, 169189.
  • 32
    Wynne B, Mayer S. How science fails the environment. New Scientist 1993, 1876: 3335.
  • 33
    Fogel CA. Greening the earth with trees: science, storylines and the construction of International Climate Change Institutions [Doctoral Dissertation]. Environmental Studies: University of California, Santa Cruz, 2002.
  • 34
    Fogel C. The local, the global, and the Kyoto Protocol. In: JasanoffS, Long MartelloM, eds. Earthly Politics, Worldly Knowledge: Local and Global in Environmental Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004, 103125.
  • 35
    CrateSA, NuttallM, eds. Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2008.
  • 36
    Fogel C. Biotic carbon sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol: the construction of global knowledge by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IntEnviron Agreements 2005, 5: 191210(20).
  • 37
    MillerCA, EdwardsPN, eds. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001.
  • 38
    PettingerM, ed. The Social Construction of Climate Change. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing; 2007.
  • 39
    Jasanoff S. Science and environmental citizenship. In: DauvergneP, ed. Handbook of Global Environmental Politics. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar; 2005, 365382.
  • 40
    Mooney C. The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books; 2005.
  • 41
    Weingart P, Krück C, Wynne B, Shackley S, Kwa C, et al. Climate change research and its integration into environmental policy: conditions for the establishment of a European political climate region. Detailed report of the contractors and sub-contractors, Annex to the progress report. EC Environmental Research Programme, 1997.
  • 42
    Viola E. O Brasil na arena internacional da mitigação da mudança climática, 1996–2008. CINDES - Centro de Estudos de Integração e Desenvolvimento 2009; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • 43
    Alves DS. Taking things public: a contribution to address human dimensions of environmental change. Philos Trans R Soc 2008, 363(1498): 19031909. DOI: 10.1098/rstb. 2007.0020.
  • 44
    Agrawala S, Broad K, Guston DH. Integrating climate forecasts and societal decision making: challenges to an emergent boundary organization. Sci Technol Human Values 2001, 26: 454477.
  • 45
    Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003, 100: 80868091.
  • 46
    Eric Darier SS, Brian W. Towards a “folk integrated assessment” of climate change? Int J Environ Pollut 1999, 11(3): 351372.
  • 47
    Guston DH. Toward a ‘best practice’ of constructing ‘serviceable truths’. In: DunnW, HisschemollerM, RavetzJR, HoppeR, eds. Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy and Risk Assessment. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press; 2000.
  • 48
    Guston DH, Keniston K. Introduction: the social contract for science. In: GustonDH, KenistonK, eds. The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994, 141.
  • 49
    Irwin A. Business as usual? Re-assessing scientific institutions and global environmental challenges. Glob Environ Change 1998, 8: 279283.
  • 50
    Irwin A. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London and New York: Routledge; 1995.
  • 51
    Jasanoff S. Harmonization: the politics of reasoning together. In: The Politics of Chemical Risk. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.
  • 52
    Lahsen M. Technocracy, democracy and U.S. climate science politics: the need for demarcations. Sci Technol Human Values 2005, 30: 137169.
  • 53
    Lahsen M. Knowledge, democracy and uneven playing fields: insights from climate politics in - and between - the U.S. and Brazil. In: StehrN, ed. Knowledge and Democracy: A 21st-Century Perspective. London: Transaction Publishers; 2008.
  • 54
    LeachM, ScoonesI, WynneB, eds. Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books; 2005.
  • 55
    Miller CA. Hybrid management: boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Sci Technol Human Values 2001, 26: 478500.
  • 56
    RaynerS, MaloneEL, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change. Columbus, Ohio: Batelle Press; 1998.
  • 57
    Jamieson D. Ethics, public policy, and global warming. Sci Technol Human Values 1992, 17: 139153.
  • 58
    Jamieson D. Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
  • 59
    McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Soc Probl 2000, 47: 499522.
  • 60
    McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement's impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy. Soc Probl 2003, 50: 348373.
  • 61
    Fischer MMJ. Four genealogies for a recombinant anthropology of science and technology. Cult Anthropol 2007, 22: 539615.
  • 62
    Shapin S. Cordelia's love: credibility and the social studies of science. Perspect Sci 1995, 3: 255275.
  • 63
    JasanoffS, Long MartelloM, eds. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004.
  • 64
    Demeritt D. Science studies, climate change and the prospects for constructivist critique. Econ Soc 2006, 35: 453479.
  • 65
    Jasanoff S, Wynne B. Science and decision making. In: RaynerS, MaloneEL, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1. Columbus, Ohio: Batelle Press; 1998, 187.
  • 66
    van der Sluijs J, van Eijndhoven, Shackley S, Wynne B. Anchoring devices in science for policy: the case of consensus around climate sensitivity. Soc Stud Sci 1998, 28: 291323.
  • 67
    Lövbrand E, Stripple J. The climate as political space: on the territorialization of the global carbon cycle. Rev Int Stud 2006, 32: 217235.
  • 68
    O'Riordan T, Cooper CL, Jordan A. Institutional frameworks for political action. In: RaynerS, MaloneEL, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1. Columbus, Ohia: Batelle Press; 1998, 345439.
  • 69
    Adger WN, Brown K, Fairbrass J, Jordan A, Paavola J, et al. Governance for sustainability: towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decision making. Environ Plann A 2003, 35: 10951110.
  • 70
    Hulme M. Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change. Trans Inst British Geogr 2008, 33: 511.
  • 71
    Hulme M. Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
  • 72
    Hulme M, Dessai S. Negotiating future climates for public policy: a critical assessment of the development of climate scenarios for the UK. Environ Sci Policy 2008, 11: 5470.
  • 73
    Magistro J, Roncoli C. Anthropological perspectives and policy implications of climate change research. Clim Res 2001, 19: 9196.
  • 74
    Proctor JD. The meaning of global environmental change: retheorizing culture in human dimensions research. Glob Environ Change 1998, 8: 227248.
  • 75
    Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 1994, 263: 641646.
  • 76
    Jasanoff S. The idiom of co-production. In: JasanoffS, ed. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Taylor & Francis, Inc.; 2004, 112.
  • 77
    Jasanoff S. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990a (1994).
  • 78
    Pielke RA Jr. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
  • 79
    Sarewitz D. Science and environmental policy: an excess of objectivity. In: FrodemanR, ed. Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community. Prentice Hall; 2000, 7998. Available at: http://www.cspo.org/products/articles/excess.objectivity.html.
  • 80
    SarewitzD, PielkeRAJr, ByerlyR, eds. Prediction: Decision-Making and the Future of Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2000.
  • 81
    Boehmer-Christiansen S. Global climate protection policy: the limits of scientific advice—Part I. Glob Environ Change 1994a, 4: 140159.
  • 82
    RedcliftM, BentonT, eds. Social Theory and the Global Environment. London and New York: Routledge; 1994.
  • 83
    Evans R. Demarcation socialized: constructing boundaries and recognizing difference. Sci Technol Human Values 2005, 30: 316.
  • 84
    Gieryn T. Boundaries of science. In: JasanoffS, MarkleGE, PetersenJC, PinchT, eds. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage; 1995, 393443.
  • 85
    Otway H. Public wisdom, expert fallibility: toward a contextual theory of risk. In: KrimskyS, GoldingD, eds. Social Theories of Risk. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1992, 215228.
  • 86
    Wynne B. Public understandings of science. In: JasanoffS, MarkleGE, PetersenJC, PinchT, eds. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage; 1995, 393443.
  • 87
    Wynne B. SSK's identity parade: signing-up, off-and-on. Soc Stud Sci 1996, 26: 357391.
  • 88
    Salick J, Ross N. Traditional peoples and climate change. Glob Environ Change 2009, 19: 137139.
  • 89
    Watson-Verran H, Turnbull D. Science and other indigenous knowledge systems. In: JasanoffS, MarkleGE, PetersenJC, PinchT, eds. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks and London: Sage Publications; 1995, 115139.
  • 90
    Hajer MA. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  • 91
    Foucault M. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, Sheridan SmithAM, trans. New York: Pantheon Books; 1972.
  • 92
    Gare AE. Postmodernism and the Environmental Crisis. London and New York: Routledge; 1995.
  • 93
    National Research Council. Our Common Journey: A Transition Toward Sustainability. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  • 94
    Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, et al. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics Of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994.
  • 95
    Lahsen M, Nobre CA. The challenge of connecting international science and local level sustainability: the case of the LBA. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10: 6274.
  • 96
    Rhoten D. Interdisciplinary research: trend or transition. Items Issues 2005c, 5: 611.
  • 97
    Smith K. The wisdom of crowds. Climate change is inherently a social problem - so why have sociologists been so slow to study it? Nature 2009; DOI:10.1038/climate.2009.73.
  • 98
    Freudenburg WR. Privileged accounts: toward a socially structured theory of resources and discourses. Soc Forces 2005, 84: 89114..
  • 99
    Mathews AS. Power/knowledge, power/ignorance: forest fires and the state in Mexico. Hum Ecol 2005, 33: 795820.
  • 100
    Mosse D. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Dev Change 2004, 35: 639671.
  • 101
    Fairhead J, Leach M. Science, society and power: environmental knowledge and policy in West Africa and the Caribbean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
  • 102
    Biermann F. ‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. GlobEnviron Change 2007, 17: 326337. DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.010.
  • 103
    Batterbury S. Anthropology and global warming: the need for environmental engagement. Aust J Anthropol 2008, 19(1): 6268.
  • 104
    Lahsen M. Anthropology and the trouble of risk society. Anthropol News 2007c, 48: 910.
  • 105
    Nader L. Up the anthropologist—perspectives gained from studying up. In: ColeJB, ed. Anthropology in the Nineties. New York: Free Press; 1988.
  • 106
    Rayner S. Fiddling while the globe warms? Anthropol Today 1989, 5: 12.
  • 107
    Lever-Tracy C. Global warming and sociology. Curr Sociol 2008, 56: 445466.
  • 108
    Slocum R. The sociology of climate change: research priorities. In: Nagel J, Dietz T, Broadbent J, eds. Summary of the proceedings of the “Sociological Perspectives on Global Climate Change” workshop held at the National Science Foundation in Arlington, Virginia, May 30–31, 2008. Available at: http://www.rslocum.com///Slocum_Sociology%20Research%20Priorities%20on%20Climate%20Change.pd, 2008: Appendix 3.
  • 109
    Yearley S. Sociology and climate change after Kyoto: what roles for social science in understanding climate change? Curr Sociol 2009, 57: 389405.
  • 110
    Appadurai A. Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Cult 2000, 12: 119.
  • 111
    Bryant RL, Bailey S. Third World Political Ecology. New York: Routledge; 1997.
  • 112
    GuptaA, FergusonJ, eds. Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997.
  • 113
    Marcus GE, Fischer MMJ. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1986.
  • 114
    Marcus GE. Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1998.
  • 115
    Tsing AL. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005.
  • 116
    CrawfordE, ShinnT, SörlinS, eds. Denationalizing Science: the Contexts of International Scientific Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1993.
  • 117
    Elzinga A. Antarctica: the construction of a continent by and for science. In: CrawfordE, ShinnT, SörlinS, eds. Denationalizing Science. Boston, London, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993b, 73106.
  • 118
    Jasanoff S. American exceptionalism and the political acknowledgment of risk. Deadalus 1990b, 19(4): 6181.
  • 119
    Jasanoff S. Science at the Bar: Law, Science and Technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995.
  • 120
    Miller CA. Scientific internationalism in American foreign policy: the case of meteorology, 1947–1958. In: MillerCA, EdwardsPN, eds. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001a, 167217.
  • 121
    Miller CA. Challenges in the application of science to global affairs: contingency, trust, and moral order. In: MillerCA, EdwardsPN, eds. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001b, 247285.
  • 122
    Schott T. World science: globalization of institutions and participation. Sci Technol Human Values 1993, 18: 196208.
  • 123
    Skolnikoff E. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.
  • 124
    Solingen E. Between markets and the state: scientists in comparative perspective. Comp Polit 1993, 26: 3151.
  • 125
    Ancarani V. Globalizing the world: science and technology in international relations. In: JasanoffS, MarkleGE, PetersenJC, PinchT, eds. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications; 1995, 652670.
  • 126
    Freudenburg WR, Frickel SF, Dwyer R. Diversity and diversion: higher superstition and the dangers of insularity in science and technology studies. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 1998, 18: 634.
  • 127
    Bulkeley H. Policy and governance: an editorial essay. WIRE Clim Change. In press.
  • 128
    Dimitrov RS. Science and International Environmental Policy: Regimes and Nonregimes in Global Governance. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.; 2006.
  • 129
    Haas PM. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 1992, 46: 135.
  • 130
    Haas PM. When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. J Eur Public Policy 2004, 11: 569592.
  • 131
    Litfin K. Environment, wealth and authority: global climate change and emerging modes of legitimation. Int Stud Rev 2000, 2: 119148.