• 1
    Grubb M. Seeking fair weather? ethics and the international debate on climate change. Int Aff 1995, 71: 462496.
  • 2
    Okereke C, Schroeder H. How can the objectives of justice, development and climate change mitigation be reconciled in the treatment of developing countries in a post-Kyoto settlement? Clim Dev 2009, 1: 1015.
  • 3
    Heyward M. Equity and international climate change negotiations: a matter of perspective. Clim Policy 2007, 7: 518534.
  • 4
    Gardiner SM. Ethics and global climate change. Ethics 2004, 114: 555600.
  • 5
    Grasso M. A normative ethical framework in climate change. Clim Change 2007, 81: 223246.
  • 6
    Muller B. Equity in Climate Change: The Great Divide. Oxford Institute of Energy Studies EV31, 2002.
  • 7
    Muylaert de Araujo MS, Pires de Campos C, Pinguelli RL. GHG historical contribution by sectors: sustainable development and equity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2005, 11: 988997.
  • 8
    Friman M, Linner B. Technology obscuring equity: historical responsibility in UNFCCC negotiations. Clim Policy 2008, 8: 339354.
  • 9
    Snidal D. Coordination versus prisoners dilemma: implications for international cooperation and regimes. Am Polit Sci Rev 1985, 79: 923942.
  • 10
    Grieco J. Anarchy and the limits of co-operation; A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. Int Organ 1988, 42: 485507.
  • 11
    Krasner S. Structural causes and regime consequences; regimes as intervening variables. In: Stephen K, ed. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1983.
  • 12
    Keohane RO. After Hegemony Co-operation and Discord in the World Political Economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1984.
  • 13
    Vogler J. Taking institutions seriously: how regimes can be relevant to multilevel environmental governance. Global Environ Politics 2003, 3: 2539.
  • 14
    Hasenclever A, Andreas P, Volker R. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
  • 15
    Young O. International Co-operation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. Ithaca, New York: Cornwell University Press, 1989.
  • 16
    Franceschet A. Moral principles and political institutions: perspectives on ethics and international affairs. Millennium J Int Studies 2002, 31: 347357.
  • 17
    Dunne T. New thinking on international society. Brit J Politics Int Relations 2001, 3: 223244.
  • 18
    Dobson A. Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Dimensions of Social Justice. Oxford: University Press; 1998.
  • 19
    Sprinz D, Vaahtoranta T. The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. Int Organ 1994, 8: 77105.
  • 20
    Susskind L, Ozawa C. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
  • 21
    Ridely M, Low B. Can selfishness save the environment? Human Ecol Rev 1993, 1: 113.
  • 22
    Ruggie J. Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution. In: Ruggie JG, ed. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993; 347.
  • 23
    Wendt A. Constructing international politics. Int Secur 1995, 20: 7181.
  • 24
    Franck T. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  • 25
    Hurrell A. Global inequality and international institutions. Metaphilosophy 2001, 32: 3457.
  • 26
    Wendt A. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. Int Organ 1987, 41: 335370.
  • 27
    Wapner P. Governance in global civil society. In: Young O (ed.), Global Governance: Drawing Insight from Environmental Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997.
  • 28
    Wolfer A. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Relations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1962; (originally written 1949).
  • 29
    Dyer, H. Normative theory and international relations. In: Dyer HC, Mangasarian L (eds). The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art. London: Macmillan; 1989.
  • 30
    Walzer M. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books; 1977.
  • 31
    Walker G, Bulkeley H. Geographies of environmental justice. Geoforum 2006, 37: 655659.
  • 32
    Grubb M, Sebenius J, Magalhaes A, Subak IM. Sharing the burden. In: Mintzer I (ed.) Confronting Climate Change: Risks, Implications and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
  • 33
    Shue H. The unavoidability of justice. In: Hurrell A, Kingsbury B (eds). International Politics of the Environment: Actors Interests and Institutions. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992.
  • 34
    Athanasiou T, Baer P. Dead Heat: Global Justice and Global Warming. New York: Seven Stories Press; 2002.
  • 35
    Roberts JT, Parks B. Climate of Injustice: Global Inequity, North-South Politics and Climate Policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2007.
  • 36
    Price R. Moral limit and possibility in world politics. Int Organ 2008, 62: 191220.
  • 37
    Toth FL (ed.) Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London: Earthscan; 1999.
  • 38
    Ikeme J. Equity, environmental justice and sustainability: incomplete approaches in climate change politics. Glob Environ Change 2003, 13: 195206.
  • 39
    Gupta S, Bhandari PM. An effective allocation criterion for CO2 emission. Energy Policy 1999, 27: 727736.
  • 40
    Parks B, Roberts JT. Environmental and ecological justice. In: Betsill MM, Hochstetler K and Stevis D eds. International Environmental Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
  • 41
    Shue H. Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy, 1993, 15: 3959.
  • 42
    IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers and Technical Summary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
  • 43
    Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ, eds. Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006.
  • 44
    Okereke C, Mann P, Osbahr H, Muller B, Ebeling J. Assessment of Key Negotiating Issues at Nairobi Climate COP/MOP and What it Means for the Future of the Climate Regime. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Working Paper, 2007; 106.
  • 45
    Breyman S. Knowledge as power: ecology movements and global environmental problems. In: Lipschutz RD, Conca K, eds. The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.
  • 46
    Hawkins A. Contested ground: international environmentalism and global climate change. In: Lipschutz RD, Conca K, eds. The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.
  • 47
    Sachs W, Santarius T, eds. Fair Future: Resource conflicts, security and global justice. London: Zed Books; 2005.
  • 48
    Hyder TO. Looking back to see forward. In: Mintzer I, Leonard JA, eds. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Conventio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
  • 49
    Dasgupta C. The climate change negotiations. In: Mintzer I, Leonard JA, eds. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
  • 50
    Biermann F, Bauer S. A World Environment Organization: Solution or Threat for Effective International Environmental Governance? Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing; 2005.
  • 51
    Ringius L, Torvanger A, Underdal A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy, international environmental agreements. Politics Law Econ 2002, 2: 122.
  • 52
    Paterson M. International justice and global warming. In: Holden B, ed. The Ethical Dimensions of Global Change. London: Macmillan; 1996a.
  • 53
    Rowlands IH. International fairness and justice in addressing global climate change. Env Polit, 1997, 6: 119.
  • 54
    Barrett S. “Acceptable” allocations of tradeable carbon emission entitlements in a global warming treaty. Combatting Global Warming: Study on a Global System of Tradeable Carbon Emission Entitlements. Geneva: UNCTAD; 1992; 85113.
  • 55
    Paavola J, Adger WN. 2006 fair adaptation to climate change. Ecol Econ 2006, 56: 594609.
  • 56
    Caney S. Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden J int Law, 2005, 18: 747775.
  • 57
    Page EA. Fairness on the day after tomorrow: justice, reciprocity and global climate change. Polit Stud 2007, 55: 225242.
  • 58
    Campbell D. Justice and international order: the case of Bosnia and Kosov. In: Jean-Marc C, Daniel W, eds. Ethics and International Affairs: Extent and Limits. New York: United Nations University Press; 2001.
  • 59
    Okereke C, Dooley K. Principles of justice in proposals and approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-Kyoto agreement. Glob Environ Change 20: 8295.
  • 60
    Ringius L, Torvanger A, Underdal A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy, Int Environ Agreements: Politics Law Econ 2002, 2: 122.
  • 61
    Okereke C. Global Justice and Neoliberal Environmental Governance: Ethics, Sustainable Development and International Co-operation. London: Routledge; 2008.
  • 62
    Paterson M. Global Warming and Global Politics. London: Routledge; 1996b.
  • 63
    Olmstead SM, Stavins RN. An international policy architecture for the post-Kyoto era. Am Econ Rev 2006, 96: 3538.
  • 64
    Najam A, Huq S, Sokona Y. Climate negotiations beyond Kyoto: developing countries concerns and interests. Clim Policy 2003, 3: 221231.
  • 65
    Paavola J, Adger WN. Justice and Adaptation to Climate Change. Tyndall centre Working paper No. 23, 2002.
  • 66
    Ashton J, Wang X. Equity and climate change: in principle and practice. Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012. Report of the Climate Dialogue at Pocantico. Virginia: Pew Centre; 2002.
  • 67
    Bachram H. Climate Fraud and carbon colonialism: the new trade in Greenhouse gases. Capitalism Nat Socialism 2005, 15: 520.
  • 68
    McCarthy J, Prudham S. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum 2004, 35: 275283.
  • 69
    Okereke C. Global environmental sustainability: intragenerational equity and conceptions of justice in multilateral environmental regimes. Geoforum 2006, 37: 725738.
  • 70
    Grubb M, Sebenius J, Magalhaes A. Who Bears the Burden? Equity and Allocation in Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Abatement. Paper for SEI project for UNCED, June, 1991.
  • 71
    Hayes P. North–South Transfer, in P Hayes and K Smith (eds), The Global Greenhouse Regime: Who Pays? London: Earthscan, 1993.
  • 72
    Grubb M. The Greenhouse Effect: Negotiating Targets. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs; 1989.
  • 73
    Rajamani L. The principle of common but differentiated responsibility and the balance of commitments under the climate regime. Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law 2000, 9: 120130.
  • 74
    Binaz S. Remarks on common but differentiated responsibility. ASIL Proc 2002, 96: 359361.
  • 75
    Borione D, Ripert J. Exercising common but differentiated responsibility. In: Mintzer I, Leonard JA, eds. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
  • 76
    Harris PG. Common but differentiated responsibility: the Kyoto protocol and United States Policy. N.Y.U. Environ Law J 1999, 27: 4142.
  • 77
    Stone C. Common and differentiated responsibility principle in international law. Am J Int Law 2002, 98: 276301.
  • 78
    Matusi Y. Some aspects of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. Int Environ Agreements: Politics Law Econ 2002, 2: 151171.
  • 79
    Okereke C. Equity norms in global environmental governance. Global Environ Politics 2008, 8: 2550.
  • 80
    Shukla PR. Justice, equity and efficiency in climate change: a developing country perspective. In: Toth FL, ed. Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London: Earthscan; 1999.
  • 81
    Den Elzen MGJ, Schaffer M, Lucas PL. Differentiating future commitments on the basis of countries relative historical responsibility for climate change: uncertainties in the Brazil proposal in the context of a policy implementation. Clim Change 2005, 71: 277301.
  • 82
    Oliva MJ. Climate Change, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights, prepared for the seminar Trade and Climate Change, Copenhagen June 18–20, 2008. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable.
  • 83
    Liverman D, Boyd E. The CDM. Ethics and development. In: Olsen KH, Fenhann J, eds. A Reformed CDMIncluding New Mechanisms for Sustainable Development: Roskilde Denmark UNEP Risø Centre; 2008.
  • 84
    Boyd E, Hultman NE, Roberts TJ, Corbera, E, Ebeling J, Liverman, DM, et al. The Clean Development Mechanism: An Assessment of Current Practice and Future Approaches for Policy, Tyndall Centre Working Paper 114, October 2007.
  • 85
    Shue H. Avoidable necessity: global warming, international fairness, and alternative energy. In: Shapiro I, DeCew JW, eds. Theory and Practice. New York: New York University Press; 1994.
  • 86
    Paterson M. Understanding Global Environmental Politics: Domination, Accumulation and Resistance. Houndmills: Macmillan; 2000.