SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Bechmann A, Sørensen NN, Berg J, Mann J, Rethore PE, Mann J. The Bolund experiment, part II: blind comparison of microscale flow models. Boundary Layer Meteorology 2011; 141: 245271. DOI: 10.1007/s10546-011-9637-x
  • 2
    VanLuvanee D, Rogers T, Randall G, Williamson A, Miller T. Comparison of WASP, CFD, NWP and analytical methods for estimating site wide wind speeds. Proceedings from AWEA Windpower, Chicago, IL, 2009.
  • 3
    Berge E, Gravdahl AR, Schelling J, Tallhaug L, Undheim O. Wind in complex terrain. A comparison of WAsP and Two CFD-models. Proceedings from EWEC, Athens, Greece, 2006.
  • 4
    Beaucage P, Brower MC, Tensen J. Evaluation of four numerical wind flow models for wind resource mapping. Wind Energy 2012. DOI: 10.1002/we.1568
  • 5
    Duynkerke PG. Application of the E – ε turbulence closure model to the neutral and stable atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 1988; 45: 865880. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469
  • 6
    Apsley DD, Castro IP. A Limited-Length-Scale k – ε Model for the Neutral and Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Boundary Layer Meteorology 1997; 83: 7598.
  • 7
    Alinot C, Masson C. k–ε model for the atmospheric boundary layer under various thermal stratifications. ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 2005; 127: 438443.
  • 8
    Weng W, Taylor PA. Modelling the one-dimensional stable boundary layer with an E–l turbulence closure scheme. Boundary Layer Meteorology 2006; 118: 305323. DOI 10.1007/s10546-005-2774-3
  • 9
    Eidsvik KJ, Utnes T. Flow separation and hydraulic transitions over hills modeled by the Reynolds equations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 1997; 67: 403413. DOI 10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00089-5
  • 10
    Montavon C. Validation of a non-hydrostatic numerical model to simulate stratified wind fields over complex topography. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 1998; 74: 273282. DOI 10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00024-5
  • 11
    Montavon C. Simulation of atmospheric flows over complex terrain for wind power potential assessment. Doctoral Thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale De Lausanne, 1998.
  • 12
    Meissner C, Weir D, Gravdahl AR. Influence of thermal stability on CFD simulations. Presented at EWEA, Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  • 13
    Montavon C. Considerations about the role of atmospheric stability in CFD models. Presented at EWEA, Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  • 14
    Evans S. Approaches to modelling atmospheric stability in STAR-CCM+. Presented at EWEA, Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  • 15
    Fahssis K, Bezault C, Delauney D. New developments on thermal stability in meteodyn WT. Presented at EWEA, Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  • 16
    CD-adapco. STAR-CCM+ version 5.06.010 user guide, 2010.
  • 17
    Thunis P, Bornstein R. Hierarchy of mesoscale flow assumptions and equations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 1996; 53: 380397.
  • 18
    Launder BE, Spalding DB. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1974; 3: 269289.
  • 19
    Cabezón D, Sanz J, Van Beeck J. Sensitivity analysis on turbulence models for the ABL in complex terrain. Scientific Proceedings of EWEC, Milan, Italy, 2007.
  • 20
    Mandas N, Cambuli F, Crasto G, Cau G. Numerical simulation of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL) over complex terrains. Proceedings from EWEC, London, UK, 2004.
  • 21
    Sumner J, Masson C. The Apsley and Castro Limited-Length-Scale k – ε model revisited for improved performance in the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary Layer Meteorology 2012. DOI: 10.1007 /s10546-012-9724-7
  • 22
    Venayagamoorthy SK, Stretch DD. On the turbulent Prandtl number in homogeneous stably stratified turbulence. The Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2010; 644: 359369.
  • 23
    Esau IN, Grachev AA. Turbulent Prandtl number in stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer: intercomparison between LES and SHEBA data. Wind Engineering 2007. ISSN 1901-9181.
  • 24
    Zilitinkevich S. On the Determination of the Height of the Ekman Boundary Layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1972; 3: 141145.
  • 25
    Monin AS, Obukhov AM. Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere. Tr. Akad. Nauk SSSR Geophiz. Inst. 1954; 24: 163187.
  • 26
    Nieuwstadt FTM. A model for the stationary, stable boundary layer. Proceedings of the Conference on Models of Turbulence and Diffusion in Stably Stratified Regions of the Natural Environment, 1983.
  • 27
    Holtslag AAM, Nieuwstadt FTM. Scaling the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1986; 36: 201209.
  • 28
    Zilitinkevich S. Current problems of stable boundary layer modelling. Proceedings of HIRLAM Baltic Workshop, 2003; 2122.
  • 29
    Ross AN, Arnold S, Vosper SB, Mobbs SD, Dixon N, Robins AG. A comparison of wind-tunnel experiments and numerical simulations of neutral and stratified flow over a hill. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 2004; 113: 427459.
  • 30
    Hayes C, Tchou J, Tanenhaus S, Bleeg J, Walter K. Atmospheric stability and its effects on wind speed correlations. Presented at CanWEA, Toronto, Canada, 2012.
  • 31
    Wharton S, Lundquist JK. Assessing atmospheric stability and its impacts on rotor-disk wind characteristics at an onshore wind farm. Wind Energy 2012; 15: 525546. DOI: 10.1002/we.483
  • 32
    Monan M, Siddiqui TA. Analysis of various schemes for the estimation of atmospheric stability classification. Atmospheric Environment 1998; 32: 37753781.
  • 33
    Baines PG. Topographic Effects in Stratified Flows. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995.
  • 34
    Corbett J, Whiting R, Bleeg J, Woodcock J, Horn U, Landberg L, Tindal A. CFD can consistently improve wind speed predictions and reduce uncertainty in complex terrain. Proceedings from EWEA, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2012.
  • 35
    Troen I, Petersen EL. European wind atlas. Report from the Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, 1989.
  • 36
    Troen I. A high resolution spectral model for flow in complex terrain. Proceedings from the 9th Symposium on Turbulence and Diffusion, Roskilde, Denmark, 1990.
  • 37
    Mortensen NG, Bowen AJ, Antoniou I. Improving WAsP predictions in (too) complex terrain. Proceedings from EWEC. Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
  • 38
    Mortensen NG, Rathmann O, Tindal A, Landberg A. Field validation of the ΔRIX performance indicator for flow in complex terrain. Proceedings from EWEC, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.