IN-HOSPITAL CARE FOR LOW-RISK CHILDBIRTH Comparison with Results from the National Birth Center Study

Authors

  • Judith T. Fullerton PhD, CNM,

    Corresponding authorSearch for more papers by this author
    • Judith T. Fullerton, PhD, received her baccalaureate degree from Wayne State University, a master of science in maternity nursing and certificate in nurse-midwifery from Columbia University, and a doctorate in health education from Temple University. She is Associate Professor of Clinical Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, where she directs a program of family nurse-practitioner and nurse-midwifery studies. Her research interests address maternal—child health program evaluation.

  • Richard Severino MS

    Search for more papers by this author
    • Richard Severino, MS, received his bachelor of science in applied mathematics and a master of science in statistics from San. Diego State University. He is currently a statistician with the Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.


Judith T. Fullerton, PhD, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, 0809, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093–0809.

ABSTRACT

The largest prospective study of freestanding birth centers was reported in 1989. This article reports on data from a comparison group of over 2,000 low-risk women who were admitted to hospital-care settings during the same period. The data on the hospitalized women were collected using the research methodology and data collection instruments developed for the birth center study. Consequently, these data offer the opportunity to observe differences that can be associated with birth site. Both groups of women experienced similar rates of serious antepartum and intrapartum health problems and maternal morbidity. However, even when controlling for complications and differences in sociodemographic characteristics, women in hospitals were more likely to receive an interventive style of labor and birth management. Neonatal outcomes were also similar, although the incidence of sustained fetal distress, prolapsed cord, and difficulty in establishing respirations were significantly greater in the hospital sample. Hospital care did not offer any advantage for women at lowest risk, and it was associated with increased intervention. The results of this study provide support for the National Birth Center Study's conclusion that birth centers offer a safe and acceptable alternative for selected pregnant women.

Ancillary