Streptococcus alactolyticus is the dominating culturable lactic acid bacterium species in canine jejunum and feces of four fistulated dogs

Authors

  • Minna L. Rinkinen,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Joanna M.K. Koort,

    1. Department of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Arthur C. Ouwehand,

    1. Department of Biochemistry and Food Chemistry, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Elias Westermarck,

    1. Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • K.Johanna Björkroth

    1. Department of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Search for more papers by this author

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +358 (50) 549 78 38; Fax: +358 (9) 191 49 670, E-mail address: minna.rinkinen@helsinki.fi

Abstract

Canine intestinal lactic acid bacterium (LAB) population in four fistulated dogs was cultured and enumerated using MRS agar. LAB levels ranging from 1.4×106 to 1.5×107 CFU ml−1 were obtained in jejunal chyme. In the fecal samples 7.0×107 and 2.0×108 CFU g−1 were detected. Thirty randomly selected isolates growing in the highest sample dilutions were identified to species level using numerical analysis of 16S and 23S rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns (ribotyping) and 16S rDNA sequence analysis. According to these results, Streptococcus alactolyticus was the dominant culturable LAB species in both feces and jejunal chyme. In addition, Lactobacillus murinus and Lactobacillus reuteri were detected.

1Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are Gram-positive, aerotolerant, catalase-negative rods or cocci producing lactic acid as their main fermentation product. They form a heterogeneous group of bacteria, the genera of Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Streptococcus and Weissella being the best known. Most LAB are non-pathogenic and they are associated with a wide variety of sources, such as plant material and various foods [1]. They also form a substantial part of the intestinal microbiota, and are believed to have a major effect on their host's well-being [2].

The knowledge of the canine intestinal LAB is scarce. Only few studies have previously addressed the canine intestinal microbiome [3–7]. Most of these studies date back to times when novel molecular techniques were not available and LAB were not identified to species level. Also the classification and nomenclature of LAB has been subjected to various changes during recent years.

In order to obtain knowledge of the culturable LAB species in canine intestinal microbiome, we enumerated and identified jejunal and fecal LAB associated with four permanently fistulated beagles. Culturing was done using anaerobic incubation and MRS agar and the predominating LAB species were identified to the species level using molecular methods.

2Materials and methods

The dogs used in the study originated from the experimental animal colony of Helsinki University. They all had permanent jejunum nipple valve fistulas operated into the proximal jejunum, 60 cm distally from pylorus. The operations had been performed 1–3 years before this study took place according to the method described by Wilsson-Rahmberg and Jonsson [8]. The fistulas did not cause any clinical discomfort or gastrointestinal symptoms to the dogs. The dogs had been used only for sampling of jejunal chyme and were not medicated. At the time of this study, the dogs were from 3 to 6 years of age. They were fed canned commercial balanced dog food, the main ingredients of which were cereal, meat, animal derivatives, oils and fats, vegetable protein extract and vegetable derivatives. The composition was as follows: raw protein 9%, raw fat 6%, raw fiber 0.4%, calcium 0.3% and phosphorus 0.25%; moisture 80%. The study had been approved by the Helsinki University ethics committee.

For the microbiological analyses, a sample of approximately 8 ml of jejunal chyme was collected from four permanently fistulated, healthy castrated male beagles 2 h postprandial. Fecal samples were collected manually from rectum of two dogs. All samples were immediately submitted to the laboratory for microbiological analyses.

Samples were homogenized in 0.1% peptone water using a Stomacher blender. Serial 10-fold dilutions of the homogenized samples were made from 10−2 to 10−8 in 0.1% peptone water. LAB were enumerated on MRS agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) inoculated using the spread plate technique. All plates were incubated in an anaerobic CO2 atmosphere (Anaerogen, Oxoid, 9–13% CO2 according to the manufacturer) at 30°C for 3–4 days. Five colonies from each sample were picked randomly from the plates showing growth of less than 100 colonies. Depending on the sample, these dilutions were 106× or 107× of the original sample. Isolates were cultured to purity using MRS agar/broth for species identification. Gram staining and catalase testing were performed before the molecular analysis.

Two ml of cultures grown overnight at 30°C in MRS broth were used for DNA isolation. DNA was isolated by the guanidium thiocyanate method by Pitcher and others [9] as modified by Björkroth and Korkeala [10] by the combined lysozyme and mutanolysin (Sigma) treatment. HindIII and EcoRI enzymes were used for restriction endonuclease treatment of 4 μg of DNA as specified by the manufacturer (New England Biolabs), and restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) was performed as described previously [10]. Southern blotting was done using a vacuum device (Vacugene, Pharmacia), and the rDNA probe for ribotyping [11] was labeled by reverse transcription (AMV-RT, Promega and Dig Labelling Kit, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as previously described [12]. Membranes were hybridized at +58 °C overnight, and the detection of the digoxigenin label was performed as recommended by the manufacturer.

For pattern analysis, the membranes were scanned with a Hewlett-Packard (Boise, ID, USA) Scan-Jet 4c/T scanner. The EcoRI and HindIII ribopatterns were compared with the corresponding patterns in the previously established LAB database at the Department of Food and Environmental Hygiene. The ribopatterns were analyzed using the BioNumerics 3.0 software package (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). The similarity between all pairs was expressed by Dice coefficient correlation, and UPGMA clustering was used for the construction of the dendrogram. Based on the use of internal controls, position tolerance of 1.5% was allowed for the bands. For the dendrogram combining the information from EcoRI and HindIII ribopatterns, equal weight was given to both banding pattern types.

Chromosomal DNA for use in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was isolated as for ribotyping. The nearly complete (at least over 1400 bases sequenced) 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR with a universal primer pair, 5′-CTGGCTCAGGAYGAACGCTG-3′ as the forward primer, corresponding to positions 19–38 in Escherichia coli 16S numbering, and 5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′ as the reverse primer, complementary to positions 1541–1522. Sequencing of the purified (QIAquick PCR purification kit, Qiagen) PCR product was performed by Sanger's dideoxynucleotide chain termination method as two long and two shorter reactions. Samples were run in a Global IR32 using LiCor sequencing device with e-Seq 1.1 software (LiCor) according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Overlapping complementary sequences were joined by the Align IR 1.2 program (LiCor). Nucleotide sequence data were analyzed with version 32.0 of the BioNumerics software package (Applied Maths). Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rDNA sequence of strains was performed by using the Bionumerics 3.0 software package (Applied Maths). Calculation of the level of similarity and construction of a phylogenetic tree was based on the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap probability values were calculated to branching points resampling 1000 trees.

3Results

LAB levels ranging from 1.4×106 to 1.5×107 CFU ml−1 were obtained in the jejunal chyme. In the two fecal samples, 7.0×107 and 2.0×108 CFU g−1 were detected.

All isolates were Gram-positive and catalase-negative. Twenty of them possessed coccal morphology while 10 were rod-shaped.

Three LAB species, Streptococcus alactolyticus, Lactobacillus murinus and Lactobacillus reuteri were detected by means of the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) database and 16S rDNA sequencing. Fig. 1a,b shows the dendrograms generated by EcoRI and HindIII restriction enzymes, respectively. Fig. 1c was made by combining the information from both restriction enzyme analyses together. All types of analyses resulted in species-specific clusters showing pattern similarity values ranging from 46.2 to 100%. In the distance matrix tree based on the 16S sequences (Fig. 2), strains were located in three branches corresponding well to the species-specific clusters obtained by ribotyping.

Figure 1.

Panels a–c present numerical analysis of 16S and 23S RFLP patterns (ribotypes) generated by EcoRI, HindIII and an analysis combining the information of both restriction enzymes, respectively. Clusters show representative patterns of all different types obtained. Numerical analyses of the patterns are presented as dendrograms, left-hand side of the EcoRI and HindIII banding patterns possesses high molecular masses, <23 kb, and right-hand side >1000 bp. Scales show percentage similarities of the patterns.

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic tree based on similarity values of almost entire 16S rDNA sequences (at least 1400 bp). Bootstrap probability values from 1000 trees resampled are given at the branch points. C. jejuni was used to root the tree. Scale shows 5% difference.

Table 1 shows the LAB species distribution within the 30 randomly selected isolates identified to the species level. Within a species, identical ribopatterns were obtained from the isolates by both enzymes used. Fig. 1 shows the representative patterns of all different types obtained. S. alactolyticus was found to be the dominant LAB species isolated from both feces and jejunal chyme. L. murinus was associated with three of the dogs while two dogs were found to carry L. reuteri (Table 1).

Table 1.  Species division (number of isolates) within the LAB 30 isolates cultured pure from jejunal chyme or feces of four castrated male dogs with permanent jejunum nipple valve fistulas
  1. Species were identified by means of an RFLP database and 16S rDNA sequencing.

LAB speciesDog 1Dog 2Dog 3Dog 4
 jejunal chymefecesjejunal chymefecesjejunal chymejejunal chyme
Streptococcus alactolyticus453323
Lactobacillus reuteri    22
Lactobacillus murinus1 221 

4Discussion

S. alactolyticus was found to be the dominating culturable LAB species in the jejunal and fecal samples associated with the dogs in the present study. It was found in all the dogs and in every sample. In addition to S. alactolyticus, strains belonging to species L. reuteri and L. murinus were detected to a lesser extent (Table 1).

To our knowledge, this is the first report on the composition of the most prevalent culturable LAB species in the canine jejunal chyme and feces. S. alactolyticus was described by Farrow and others [13], they isolated it from the intestines of pigs and the feces of chicken. This organism has also been documented to reside in the pigeon intestines, although only as a minor part of the microbiota [14]. Ureolytic Streptococcus intestinalis was reported to be the predominant member of the pig colonic microbiota [15]. Later work by Vandamme and co-workers [16] revealed that S. intestinalis is a junior subjective synonym of S. alactolyticus and therefore pigs must also be considered as a host of S. alactolyticus.

In a recent study [7], the fecal microbiota of four Labrador retrievers was examined, and Streptococcus bovis and L. murinus were found to be the most prevalent culturable LAB species. In this study, there was variation in the occurrence of LAB species between the different samples. This was not clearly evident in our work. However, it has been documented that the canine intestinal microbiota may change in time [6], so the finding could reflect natural variation. The composition of intestinal bacterial flora is known to be host species-specific and dependent on dietary and environmental factors [17]. This may also explain the differences in LAB strains between the present study and the work published by Greetham and co-workers [7]. In addition, their study dealt only with the fecal microbiota whereas we identified the most prevalent culturable small intestinal LAB, too. However, the dogs we studied live in a colony of experimental animals. They have very few contacts with dogs outside the colony and their lives do not fully resemble the life of a domestic pet. On the other hand, the possibilities to examine the small intestinal microbiota in healthy, non-medicated pet dogs are practically non-existent.

LAB are reported to have several beneficial effects on their host's well-being. They may suppress the growth of intestinal pathogens by means of competitive exclusion [18,19], and they have been documented to enhance the immune functions in humans and mice [20,21]. It is noteworthy that with the exception of L. reuteri, none of the LAB strains detected in this study are used in commercial probiotic products.

Human gut microbiome has already been studied using various culture-independent methods, whereas in association with canine intestinal microbiome these studies are only on their way. Therefore, our results form a basis for the future either culture-dependent or independent studies dealing with canine intestinal microbiota. We conclude that knowledge of the dominant culturable LAB in the dog is necessary for further studies on the canine intestinal microbial ecology.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ms. Henna Niinivirta for the excellent technical assistance. Financial support from the Academy of Finland (Project 100479) for the identification of the LAB strains is gratefully acknowledged.

Ancillary