SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Shah MA, Williams DR. Cesarean section on demand: Round one. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004; 49:857.
  • 2
    Williams D. The Top 10 Reasons Elective Cesarean Section Should be on the Decline. AWHONN Lifelines, FebruaryMarch 2005.
  • 3
    Resnik R. Editorial: Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified? Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:7523.
  • 4
    Harer B. Maternal choice cesarean [transcript excerpt]. “Good Morning America” ABC Television, Tuesday, June 20, 2000. Available from: www.sciencebasedbirth.comtemporary02CEO20synop20politics_of_cesarean_2004.htmMaternal. [Accessed April 20, 2006].
  • 5
    ACOG. Surgery and patient choice: The ethics of decision making. Ethics Committee Opinion #289. American College of Obstetrician Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:110106.
  • 6
    ACOG. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Practice Bulletin No. 54. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:20312.
  • 7
    Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Anath CV. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:7718.
  • 8
    Pare E, Quinones J, Macones G. Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean section: Assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes. BJOG 2006; 113:7585.
  • 9
    Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. State-of-the-Science Conference Statement [Internet]. National Institutes of Health. March 27–9, 2006. Available from: http:consensus.nih.gov20062006CesareanSOS027html.htm. [Accessed April 20, 2006].
  • 10
    Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Menacker F, Sutton PD, Mathews TJ. Preliminary births for 2004: Infant and maternal health. Health E-stats. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, November 15 2005.
  • 11
    Maternity Center Association. What Every Pregnant Woman Needs to Know about Cesarean Section. New York: MCA, July 2004.
  • 12
    Maternity Center Association. Listening to Mothers Survey: report of the First national U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences. October 2002. Available from: http:www.childbirthconnection.org. [Accessed April 8, 2003].
  • 13
    Stein R. NIH Panel Finds No Extra Risk in Caesarean Section. Washington Post. March 30, 2006:A01.
  • 14
    ACOG. Episiotomy. ACOG Practice Bulletin #71. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:95762.