Joseph Booth, M.Div, JD, FAAML, is an attorney licensed to practice in the states of Kansas and Missouri who has written on the subject of health care law. He has done volunteer work for ACNM, their local chapters, and educational institutions training CNMs on legal issues.
An Update on Vicarious Liability for Certified Nurse-Midwives/Certified Midwives
Version of Record online: 24 DEC 2010
2007 American College of Nurse Midwives
Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health
Volume 52, Issue 2, pages 153–157, March-April 2007
How to Cite
Booth, J. W. (2007), An Update on Vicarious Liability for Certified Nurse-Midwives/Certified Midwives. Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health, 52: 153–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.11.004
- Issue online: 24 DEC 2010
- Version of Record online: 24 DEC 2010
- professional liability;
- vicarious liability
The unique placement of midwives in the health care industry prompts renewed consideration of vicarious liability. Generally, vicarious liability is the liability of an employer for an employee's actions. A review of recent case law over the past decade shows limited case activity and indicates that the certified nurse-midwife/certified midwife (CNM/CM) roles do not create vicarious liability risks different from any other employee/agent. The lack of case law signals a lack of dispute over vicarious liability, not a lack of liability. Absent unique statutory provisions, which may be in effect in a minority of states, an employer of a CNM/CM is as liable for the midwife's negligence committed in the scope of their employment as employers are generally liable for an employee's negligence. When there is no employment/agency relationship, vicarious liability does not apply. A collaborative practice agreement is a good example of a nonemployment arrangement. Proper contractual documentation of relationships and comprehensive professional liability coverage are necessary to manage this form of liability.