Stimulus modality and Go/NoGo effects on P3 during parallel visual and auditory continuous performance tasks

Authors

  • Ayda Tekok-Kilic,

    1. Division of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
    2. Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Janet L. Shucard,

    1. Division of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • David W. Shucard

    Corresponding author
    1. Division of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
    2. Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA
      Address reprint requests to: David W. Shucard, Ph.D., Department of Neurology, Division Of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, The Buffalo General Hospital, 100 High Street (D-6), Buffalo, NY 14203, USA. E-mail: dshucard@acsu.buffalo.edu.
    Search for more papers by this author

Address reprint requests to: David W. Shucard, Ph.D., Department of Neurology, Division Of Developmental and Behavioral Neurosciences, The Buffalo General Hospital, 100 High Street (D-6), Buffalo, NY 14203, USA. E-mail: dshucard@acsu.buffalo.edu.

Abstract

Task and modality effects on P3 latency, amplitude, and scalp topography were studied during parallel versions of visual (VCPT) and auditory (ACPT) continuous performance tasks using a Go/NoGo paradigm (A-X CPT). Both the ACPT and VCPT incorporated five conditions including Go and NoGo stimulus sequences as well as three other nontarget conditions. The goal was to evaluate the functional significance and modality specificity of the P300 response and the NoGo P3. Analyses were performed using both raw and normalized data to make comparisons across modalities. For both modalities, the Target X (Go) and three nontarget conditions elicited maximum P3 amplitudes over the posterior scalp sites and qualified as classical P300 responses. The NoGo condition was associated with an increase in central-frontal amplitude compared to the Target X condition. The scalp topography of the P300/P3 for Go and NoGo conditions, as well as all other conditions, was the same for both modalities, supporting the modality independent nature of both P300 and the NoGo P3. Min-Max normalization of P3 amplitudes did not change the condition-topography relationships.

Ancillary