You have free access to this content

Genetic relatedness of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) to nearby subspecies of Z. hudsonius as inferred from variation in cranial morphology, mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite DNA: implications for taxonomy and conservation

  1. Rob Roy Ramey II1,*,
  2. Hsiu-Ping Liu1,2,
  3. Clinton W. Epps3,
  4. Lance M. Carpenter1,
  5. John D. Wehausen4

Article first published online: 28 FEB 2006

DOI: 10.1017/S1367943005002313

Issue

Animal Conservation

Animal Conservation

Volume 8, Issue 3, pages 329–346, August 2005

Additional Information

How to Cite

Ramey, R. R., Liu, H.-P., Epps, C. W., Carpenter, L. M. and Wehausen, J. D. (2005), Genetic relatedness of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) to nearby subspecies of Z. hudsonius as inferred from variation in cranial morphology, mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite DNA: implications for taxonomy and conservation. Animal Conservation, 8: 329–346. doi: 10.1017/S1367943005002313

Author Information

  1. 1

    Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Department of Zoology, 2001 Colorado Blvd., Denver, Colorado 80205-5798, USA

  2. 2

    University of Denver, Department of Biological Sciences, 2190 E. Iliff, Denver, CO 80208, USA

  3. 3

    University of California, Department of ESPM, 137 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA

  4. 4

    University of California, White Mountain Research Station, 3000 East Line Street, Bishop, CA 93514, USA

* All correspondence to: Rob Roy Ramey II. Tel: +1303 370 6443; Tel/Fax: +1 303 331 6492; E-mail: ramey@spot.colorado.edu

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 28 FEB 2006
  2. Article first published online: 28 FEB 2006
  3. (Received 5 August 2004; resubmitted 9 March 2005; accepted 11 May 2005)

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (341K)

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Jessica L. Hoisington-Lopez, Lisette P. Waits, Jack Sullivan, Species limits and integrated taxonomy of the Idaho ground squirrel (Urocitellus brunneus): genetic and ecological differentiation, Journal of Mammalogy, 2012, 93, 2, 589

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Jason L. Malaney, Jennifer K. Frey, Joseph A. Cook, The biogeographic legacy of an imperilled taxon provides a foundation for assessing lineage diversification, demography and conservation genetics, Diversity and Distributions, 2012, 18, 7
    Direct Link:
  3. 3
    Robert A. Schorr, Using a temporal symmetry model to assess population change and recruitment in the Preble's meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei), Journal of Mammalogy, 2012, 93, 5, 1273

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    S. Laurence, D. W. Coltman, J. C. Gorrell, A. I. Schulte-Hostedde, Genetic Structure of Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) and Its Concordance with Taxonomy in North America, Journal of Heredity, 2011, 102, 6, 688

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Phil Hedrick, Conservation genetics: a European view, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2010, 25, 2, 65

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Zhenxin Fan, Shaoying Liu, Yang Liu, Bo Zeng, Xiuyue Zhang, Cong Guo, Bisong Yue, Molecular phylogeny and taxonomic reconsideration of the subfamily Zapodinae (Rodentia: Dipodidae), with an emphasis on Chinese species, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2009, 51, 3, 447

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Berry J Brosi, Eric G Biber, Statistical inference, Type II error, and decision making under the US Endangered Species Act, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7, 9, 487

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Michael S. Carolan, Is It a Distinct Subspecies? Preble's Mouse and the “Best Available Science” Mandate of the Endangered Species Act, Society & Natural Resources, 2008, 21, 10, 944

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Michael S. Carolan, The politics in environmental science: The Endangered Species Act and the Preble's mouse controversy, Environmental Politics, 2008, 17, 3, 449

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    John R. Skalski, Richard L. Townsend, Lyman L. McDonald, John W. Kern, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Type I errors linked to faulty statistical analyses of endangered subspecies classifications, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2008, 13, 2, 199

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    ROB ROY RAMEY II, JOHN D. WEHAUSEN, HSIU-PING LIU, CLINTON W. EPPS, LANCE M. CARPENTER, How King et al. (2006) define an ‘evolutionary distinction’ of a mouse subspecies: a response, Molecular Ecology, 2007, 16, 17
    Direct Link:
  12. 12
    Emma Marris, Linnaeus at 300: The species and the specious, Nature, 2007, 446, 7133, 250

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    J. MICHAEL SCOTT, JANET L. RACHLOW, ROBERT T. LACKEY, ANNA B. PIDGORNA, JOCELYN L. AYCRIGG, GABRIELLE R. FELDMAN, LEONA K. SVANCARA, DAVID A. RUPP, DAVID I. STANISH, R. KIRK STEINHORST, Policy Advocacy in Science: Prevalence, Perspectives, and Implications for Conservation Biologists, Conservation Biology, 2007, 21, 1
    Direct Link:
  14. 14
    MATTHEW A. CRONIN, A Proposal to Eliminate Redundant Terminology for Intra-Species Groups, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2006, 34, 1
    Direct Link:
  15. You have free access to this content15
    A. Martin, Advocacy dressed up as science: response to , Animal Conservation, 2006, 9, 3
    Direct Link:
  16. You have free access to this content16
    K. A. Crandall, Advocacy dressed up as scientific critique, Animal Conservation, 2006, 9, 3
    Direct Link:
  17. 17
    TIM L. KING, JOHN F. SWITZER, CHERYL L. MORRISON, MICHAEL S. EACKLES, COLLEEN C. YOUNG, BARBARA A. LUBINSKI, PAUL CRYAN, Comprehensive genetic analyses reveal evolutionary distinction of a mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) proposed for delisting from the US Endangered Species Act, Molecular Ecology, 2006, 15, 14
    Direct Link:
  18. 18
    D. J. Schmidt, J. M. Hughes, Genetic affinities among subspecies of a widespread Australian lycaenid butterfly, Ogyris amaryllis (Hewitson), Australian Journal of Zoology, 2006, 54, 6, 429

    CrossRef

  19. You have free access to this content19
    S. N. Vignieri, E. M. Hallerman, B. J. Bergstrom, D. J. Hafner, A. P. Martin, P. Devers, P. Grobler, N. Hitt, Mistaken view of taxonomic validity undermines conservation of an evolutionarily distinct mouse: a response to , Animal Conservation, 2006, 9, 3
    Direct Link:
  20. You have free access to this content20
    R. R. Ramey, J. D. Wehausen, H.-P. Liu, C. W. Epps, L. M. Carpenter, Response to : Should hypothesis testing or selective post hoc interpretation of results guide the allocation of conservation effort?, Animal Conservation, 2006, 9, 3
    Direct Link:
  21. 21
    SUSAN M. HAIG, ERIK A. BEEVER, STEVEN M. CHAMBERS, HOPE M. DRAHEIM, BRUCE D. DUGGER, SUSIE DUNHAM, ELISE ELLIOTT-SMITH, JOSEPH B. FONTAINE, DYLAN C. KESLER, BRIAN J. KNAUS, IARA F. LOPES, PETE LOSCHL, THOMAS D. MULLINS, LISA M. SHEFFIELD, Taxonomic Considerations in Listing Subspecies Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, Consideraciones Taxonómicas para Enlistar Subespecies en el Acta de Especies en Peligro de E. U. A., Conservation Biology, 2006, 20, 6
    Direct Link:
  22. 22
    Edgard O. Espinoza, Jesica L. Espinoza, Pepper W. Trail, Barry W. Baker, The Future of Wildlife Forensic Science,
    Direct Link:
Get PDF (341K)