Get access

Antibody Capture from Corn Endosperm Extracts by Packed Bed and Expanded Bed Adsorption


  • Todd J. Menkhaus,

    1. Department of Chemical Engineering, 2114 Sweeney Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011–2230
    Current affiliation:
    1. XOMA (US) LLC, 2910 7th Street, Berkeley, CA 94710
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Charles E. Glatz

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Chemical Engineering, 2114 Sweeney Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011–2230
    • Department of Chemical Engineering, 2114 Sweeney Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011–2230. Ph: 515–294-8472. Fax: 515–294-2689
    Search for more papers by this author


Topical treatments of chronic infections with monoclonal antibodies will require large quantities of antibodies. Because plants have been proven capable of producing multisubunit antibodies and provide for large-scale production, they are likely hosts to enable such applications. Recovery costs must also be low because of the relatively high dosages required. Hence, we have examined the purification of a human secretory antibody from corn endosperm extracts by processing alternatives of packed bed and expanded bed adsorption (EBA). Because of the limited availability of the transgenic corn host, the system was modeled by adding the antibody to extracts of nontransgenic corn endosperm. Complete clarification of a crude extract followed by packed bed adsorption provided antibody product in 75% yield with 2.3-fold purification (with antibody accounting for 24% of total protein). The small size of the packed bed, cation-exchange resin SP-Sepharose FF and the absence of a dense core (present in EBA resins) allowed for more favorable breakthrough performance compared to EBA resins evaluated. Four adsorbents specifically designed for EBA operation, with different physical properties (size and density), chemical properties (ligand), and base matrices were tested: SP-steel core resin (UpFront Chromatography), Streamline SP and Streamline DEAE (Amersham Biosciences), and CM Hyper-Z (BioSepra/Ciphergen Biosystems). Of these, the small hyperdiffuse-style resin from BioSepra had the most favorable adsorption characteristics. However, it could not be utilized with crude feeds due to severe interactions with corn endosperm solids that led to bed collapse. UpFront SP-steel core resin, because of its relatively smaller size and hence lower internal mass transfer resistance, was superior to the Streamline resins and operated successfully with application of a crude corn extract filtered to remove all solids of >44 μm. However, the EBA performance with this adsorbent provided a yield of only 61% and purification factor of 2.1 (with antibody being 22% of total protein). Process simulation showed that capital costs were roughly equal between packed and expanded bed processes, but the EBA design required four times greater operating expenditures. The use of corn endosperm as the starting tissue proved advantageous as the amount of contaminating protein was reduced ∼80 times compared to corn germ and ∼600 times compared to canola. Finally, three different inlet designs (mesh, glass beads, and mechanical mixing) were evaluated on the basis of their ability to produce efficient flow distribution as measured by residence time distribution analysis. All three provided adequate distribution (axial mixing was not as limiting as mass transfer to the adsorption process), while resins with different physical properties did not influence flow distribution efficiency values (i.e., Peclet number and HETP) when operated with the same inlet design.

Get access to the full text of this article