SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baird, A. J., S. W. Gaffney, Cylindrical piezometer responses in a humified fen peat, Nord. Hydrol., 25, 167182, 1994.
  • Bear, J., A. Veirujt, Modeling Groundwater Flow and Pollution, D. Reidel, Norwell, Mass., 1987.
  • Boelter, D. H., Important physical properties of peat material, Proceedings of the 3rd International Peat Congress, Quebec City, 1967, 159224, 1968.
  • Bronswijk, J. J. B., Modeling of water balance, cracking and subsidence of clay soils, J. Hydrol., 97, 199212, 1988.
  • Chow, T. L., H. W. Rees, I. Ghanem, R. Cormier, Compactibility of cultivated Sphagnum peat material and its influence on hydrological characteristics, Soil Sci., 1534, 300306, 1992.
  • Danielson, R. E., andP. L. Sutherland, Porosity, inMethods of Soil Analysis, Part 1,2, Agron. Monogr., 9, edited byA. Klute, pp.443461,Soil Sci. Soc. of Am.,Madison, Wis.,1986.
  • , Environment Canada, Historical streamflow summary, Quebec, 526, Water Surv. of Can., Ottawa, Ont., 1992.
  • , Environment Canada, Canadian climatic normals 1961–1990: Temperature and precipitation, Quebec, 216, Atmos. Environ. Serv., Downsview, Ont., Canada, 1993.
  • Fetter, C. W., Applied Hydrogeology3, 691, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1994.
  • Freeze, R. A., J. A. Cherry, Groundwater, 614, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1979.
  • Hayward, P. M., R. S. Clymo, Profiles of water content and pore size in Sphagnum and peat, and their relation to peat bog ecology, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 215, 299325, 1982.
  • Heiskanen, J., Physical properties of two-component growth media based on Sphagnum peat and their implications for plant-available water and aeration, Plant Soil, 172, 4554, 1995.
  • Hemond, H. F., J. C. Goldman, On non-Darcian water flow in peat, J. Ecol., 73, 579584, 1985.
  • Hobbs, N. B., Mire morphology and the properties and behaviour of some British and foreign peats, Q. J. Eng. Geol., 19, 780, 1986.
  • Hsieh, J. J. C., C. G. Enfield, Steady-state method of measuring unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 52, 123129, 1974.
  • Hvorslev, M. J., Time lag and soil permeability in groundwater observations, U.S. Army Waterways Exp. Sta. Bull., 36, U.S. Army Corps Eng., Vicksburg, Miss., 1951.
  • Ingram, H. A. P., HydrologyEcosystems of the World, 4A, Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen and MoorA. J. P. Gore, 67159, Elsevier Sci., New York, 1983.
  • Keys, D., Canadian peat harvesting and the environment, Sustaining Wetlands Issues, Pap., 1992-3 29, N. Am. Wetlands Conserv. Counc. (Can.), Ottawa, Ont., 1992.
  • LaRose, S. D., Restauration hydrologique d'une tourbiire abandonne apre exploitation, M.Sc. thesis,Dep. de Phytologie, Laval Univ., Quebec City,Quebec, Canada,1996.
  • LaRose, S. D., J. S. Price, L. Rochefort, Rewetting of a cutover peatland: Hydrological assessment, Wetlands, 17, 416473, 1997.
  • Lefebvre, G., P. Langlois, C. Lupien, J. G. Lavallee, Laboratory testing and in situ behaviour of peat as embankment foundation, Can. Geotech. J., 21, 322337, 1984.
  • McLay, C. D. A., R. F. Allbrook, K. Thompson, Effect of development and cultivation on physical properties of peat soils in New Zealand, Geoderma, 54, 2337, 1992.
  • , National Wetland Working Group, Canada's Wetlands, map folio, Energy Mines and Resour. and Environ. Can., Ottawa, Ont., 1986.
  • Nuttle, W. K., H. F. Hemond, K. D. Stolzenbach, Mechanisms of water storage in salt marsh sediments: The importance of dilation, Hydrol. Proc., 4, 113, 1990.
  • Price, J. S., Hydrology and microclimate of a partly restored cutover bog, Quebec, Hydrol. Proc., 10, 12631272, 1996.
  • Price, J. S., Soil moisture, water tension, and water table relationships in a managed cutover bog, J. Hydrol., 202, 2132, 1997.
  • Price, J. S., S. M. Schlotzhauer, Importance of shrinkage and compression in determining water storage changes in peat: The case of a mined peatland, Hydrol. Proc., 1999.
  • Price, J. S., L. Rochefort, F. Quinty, Energy and moisture considerations on cutover peatlands: Surface microtopography, mulch cover and Sphagnum regeneration, Ecol. Eng., 10, 293312, 1998.
  • Priestley, C. H. B., R. J. Taylor, On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Mon. Weather Rev., 100, 8192, 1972.
  • Quinty, F., L. Rochefort, Plant reintroduction on a harvested peat bog, Northern Forested Wetlands: Ecology and ManagementC. C. Trettin, et al., 133145, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1996.
  • Rycroft, D. W., D. J. A. Williams, H. A. P. Ingram, The transmission of water through peat, II, Field experiments, J. Ecol., 63, 557568, 1975.
  • Schlotzhauer, S. M., Modeling Soil Water Dynamics in a Managed Cutover Peat Field, Quebec: A Ditch-Peat Recharge System, M. E. S. thesis,Dep. of Geogr., Univ. of Waterloo,Waterloo, Ont., Canada,1998.
  • Schothorst, C. J., Subsidence of low moor peat in the western Netherlands, Geoderma, 17, 265291, 1977.
  • Schouwenaars, J. M., Hydrological research in disturbed bogs and its role in decisions on water management in the NetherlandsInternational Symposium on the Hydrology of Wetlands in Temperate and Cold RegionsJoensuuFinlandJune 6–8, 1988.
  • vanGenuchten, M. T., F. J. Leij, S. R. Yates, The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soilsEPA Rep. 600/2-91/065Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, D. C.Dec., 1991.
  • Ward, R. C., M. Robinson, Principles of Hydrology3, 365, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990.
  • Weiss, R., J. Aim, R. Laiho, J. Laine, Modeling moisture retention in peat soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62, 305313, 1998.