This paper deals with the fourth in a sequence of canonical problems aimed toward an understanding of the time domain (TD) behavior of wideband-excited sequentially pulsed planar periodic finite arrays of dipoles, which play an important role in a variety of practical applications. The present investigation of sequentially pulsed semi-infinite planar dipole arrays extends our previous studies of sequentially pulsed infinite and semi-infinite line dipole arrays and of infinite planar dipole arrays. The discrete element-by-element radiations are converted collectively to radiations from a series of Floquet wave (FW)-modulated truncated smooth equivalent aperture distributions, and to corresponding FW-modulated edge diffraction. After a summary of necessary results from the earlier studies, emphasis is placed on the new truncation-induced TD results and interpretations, which are extracted via phenomenology-matched high-frequency asymptotics from rigorous frequency and time domain formulations parameterized in terms of the dispersive FW instantaneous frequencies and wave numbers. As in our previous studies, the outcome is a numerically efficient, physically incisive algorithm whose accuracy is verified preliminarily by application to a pulsed planar strip array of dipoles.
 The prototype study of short-pulse radiation by a semi-infinite sequentially pulsed planar periodic array of dipoles (Figure 1) plays an important role in the efficient modeling of time-dependent radiation from, or scattering by, actual rectangular phased array antennas, frequency selective surfaces and related applications. Impulsive (delta function) excitations of the array elements, leading to the time domain (TD) Green's functions (GF), are analyzed here, as well as band-limited short-pulse excitations to model more realistic signals.
 Our approach is based on the exact equivalence between summation over the contributions from individual sequentially pulsed elements in an array and their collective treatment (via Poisson summation) in terms of infinite series of time domain (TD) Floquet waves (FW). We have already investigated the basic canonical TD-GFs for infinite [Felsen and Capolino, 2000] and truncated [Capolino and Felsen, 2002] periodic line arrays, and that for an infinite periodic planar array [Capolino and Felsen, 2003]. These cases have been parameterized, respectively, in terms of nontruncated or truncated conical TD-FWs [Felsen and Capolino, 2000; Capolino and Felsen, 2002], truncation-induced TD FW-modulated tip diffractions [Capolino and Felsen, 2002], and nontruncated planar TD-FWs [Capolino and Felsen, 2003], which furnish understanding of the corresponding FW critical parameters and phenomenologies pertaining to time domain analysis of spatial periodicity. The present contribution extends the investigation of Capolino and Felsen  to a semi-infinite periodic sequentially pulsed planar array, which introduces new truncation-induced TD phenomena.
 We proceed by accessing the time domain through asymptotic inversion of the frequency domain (FD) semi-infinite array results of Capolino et al. [2000b, 2000c], and obtain thereby the instantaneous frequencies that parameterize the behavior of the constituent TD-FWs. The problem is formulated in section 2. Section 3 contains a summary of the relevant FD results from Capolino et al. [2000b], prepared so as to facilitate the inversion to the TD, which is carried out in sections 4 and 5. Section 4 summarizes the TD-FW behavior for the infinite planar array investigated by Capolino and Felsen  because these FWs play an essential role in building up the behavior for the semi-infinite case. Here emphasis is on the distinction between the nondispersive lowest-order, and the dispersive higher-order TD-FWs. The TD-FW behavior for the semi-infinite array is developed in section 5, using the infinite array results in section 4 to parameterize and interpret truncation-induced phenomena affecting the bulk TD-FWs as well as giving rise to TD-FW-modulated diffractions from the array edge. Explaining these new TD results in section 5 in terms of band-limited (BL) problem-matched asymptotics implemented on the inversion integral (4) from the FD constitutes the main contribution in this paper. Preliminary numerical examples of radiation from a two-edged strip array with pulsed band-limited excitation in section 6 demonstrate the accuracy of the TD-FW algorithm and illustrate the rapid convergence of the (TD-FW)-based field representation since only a few terms are required for describing the off-surface field radiated by the truncated planar array. Conclusions are presented in section 7. Refinement and future calibration of these preliminary results through a systematic series of numerical experiments over broad ranges of parameters is reserved for a future publication.
2. Statement of the Problem
 The geometry of the array of parallel sequentially excited pulsed electric current dipole elements, oriented along the arbitrary vector direction J0 and radiating into free space, is shown in Figure 1. The array is infinite in the z direction and truncated in the x direction. Both cartesian and cylindrical reference coordinate systems with their z-axes along the array edge are introduced such that the array occupies the region x > 0, y = 0. The interelement period is dx and dz along the x and z directions, respectively. The E field component is simply related to the J0-directed magnetic scalar potential A which shall be used throughout. A caret ^ tags time-dependent quantities throughout and bold face symbols define vector quantities. With primed coordinates identifying generic source locations, any particular location is indexed by (x′, z′) ≡ (ndx, mdz), and the corresponding transient current excitations are denoted by (ndx, mdz, t), with the frequency (ω) and time (t) domains related via the Fourier transform pair
The phased array FD and TD dipole currents J(ω) and (t), respectively, are given by
where k = ω/c denotes the ambient wave number and c denotes the ambient wave speed. In the m, n-dependent element current amplitudes in the last factor in (2), ωηx/c and ωηz/c in the FD portion account for an assumed (linear) phase difference between adjacent elements in the x and z directions, respectively, with ηx/c and ηz/c as the interelement phase gradients normalized with respect to ω. The TD portion identifies sequentially pulsed dipole elements, with the element at (x′, z′) = (ndx, mdz) turned on at time tmn = (ηxndx + ηzmdz)/c. The important nondimensional single parameter, which is tied to the rotated coordinate system defined by u1 (see Figure 1),
combines both phasings ηx and ηz. In (3), γu1 = η/c = 1/vu1(p) is the normalized (with respect to ω) phase gradient along u1, and vu1(p) = c/η is the corresponding impressed phase speed. The TD cutoff condition η = 1 (vu1(p) = c) separates two distinct wave dynamics. For η < 1 the excitation phase speed vu1(p) = c/η along u1 is larger than the ambient wave speed c, and the projected phase speeds c/ηx and c/ηz along directions x and z are greater than c. Conversely, for η > 1, the excitation phase speed vu1(p) = c/η of the array along u1 is slower than c and will not be considered in this paper [see Felsen and Capolino, 2000; Capolino and Felsen, 2003] for some details about the more intricate but practically less important η > 1 case).
 Let the total (m, n)-summed frequency domain field at r ≡ (x, y, z), due to an array whose individual elements are excited by unit amplitude harmonic currents with phasing exp[−jk(ηxndx + ηzndz)] be represented by Atot(r, ω). The total time-dependent electric field excited by a band-limited (BL) signal is then given by
in which G(ω) is the weight assigned to each frequency component. In our applications (see section 6), the pulse spectrum G(ω) is bounded away from ω = 0 in such a manner as to render the high-frequency asymptotic expressions for Atot(r, ω) by Capolino et al. [2000b] valid over the entire bandwidth. Therefore the integral in (4) has portions that can be regarded as amplitude functions which vary slowly with frequency and as phase functions which oscillate rapidly, denoted by F(ω) and (ω), respectively, in (16), (32), and (36). This establishes the prerequisites for asymptotic evaluation in the ω domain. Since the composite phase function in (4) depends on space, time, and frequency, the asymptotic TD fields are parameterized by space-time-dependent saddle point frequencies found explicitly in the following sections.
3. Frequency-Domain Radiated FW Field: Preparation for TD Inversion
 It may be recalled that by Poisson summation, the sum of discretized element-by-element excitations in (2) can be converted into a sum of FW-modulated smoothly continuous equivalent source distributions covering the infinite (or semi-infinite) array aperture [see Capolino et al., 2000b]. For convenience, we summarize below the relevant results of the FD-FW asymptotics for the magnetic vector potential, including FW-modulated diffracted fields, that were presented by [Capolino et al., 2000b, ">Equations (14)–(16)] for the electric field. Also, we exhibit explicitly the ω dependences in anticipation of the TD inversion from the FD. Without loss of generality, due to symmetry, we restrict our analysis to the upper half-space y > 0. The radiated field (with a suppressed time dependence exp(jωt)) is expressed as
which contains infinite series of (pq)-indexed FW contributions ApqFW (r, ω), and q-indexed diffracted fields Aqd(r, ω) arising from the edge of the array. The pqth FW in (5) is given by
and U(α) = 1 or 0 for α > 0 or α < 0, respectively. The spectral wave numbers
represent the FW propagation coefficients (wave numbers) along x and z, respectively. Furthermore,
with the branch chosen to render m(kypq) ≤ 0 on the top Riemann sheet; furthermore, ℜe(kypq) ≥ 0 or ℜe(kypq) ≤ 0 for ω > 0 or < 0, respectively, consistent with the radiation condition at y = ∞ for positive or negative frequencies. In (6), kxp2 + kzq2 < k2 characterizes propagating FW while kxp2 + kzq2 > k2 characterizes evanescent FWs. It is worth noting that the FW representation in (6) is the same as that for the infinite array, except for the Heaviside unit step function U in (5) that confines the domain of existence of the FWs to the region ϕ < ϕpqSB [see Capolino et al., 2000c, Figures 1 and 2]. The angle ϕpqSB denotes the shadow boundary (SB) of the pqth FW and, for propagating FWs, is given by Capolino et al. [2000b, equation (24)]:
which also specifies the direction of the azimuthal component (in the (x, y) plane) of the pqth FW vector. In (10),
specifies the amplitude of the azimuthal (transverse-to-z) component of the pqth FW wave vector (see also the phase factor in (12)). As in (9), the branch is chosen to render m(kρq) ≤ 0 on the top Riemann sheet, while ℜe(kρq) ≥ 0 or ℜe(kρq) ≤ 0 for ω > 0 or < 0, respectively. The asymptotic evaluation of the qth diffracted FW field in (5), carried out by [Capolino et al. [2000b, section III-B], leads to
in which q(ω) = + (j/dx)Σp=−∞∞ [kρq(ω) cos ϕ − ηxω/c − αp]−1 = [1 − ]−1, and F is the transition function of the Uniform Theory of Diffraction (UTD) [Kouyoumjian and Pathak, 1974],
In (12), P denotes the number of poles extracted in the Van der Waerden procedure [see Capolino et al., 2000b, equation (25)]. Owing to the exponential attenuation of the evanescent Floquet waves along y, the convergence of the (p, q) sum of FWs is very rapid away from the array plane. Furthermore, owing to the exponential decay along ρ of the evanescent diffracted FWs, the convergence of the q-sum of diffracted FWs is rapid away from the edge. Thus, in practice, only a few terms have to be retained in (5) to provide excellent approximations of the FD radiated field [see Capolino et al., 2000c, section II-B].
4. Time Domain Floquet Waves for the Infinite Array
 Here we select from Capolino and Felsen  those TD-FWpq results which bear directly on the truncation studies in section 5. Thus, for the present, we shall ignore the truncation SBs represented by the step function U in (5).
4.1. Nondispersive TD-FW00
 The case p = q = 0 is nondispersive. This implies that the wave numbers in (7), (8), and (9) reduce for the p = q = 0 case to kx,0 = ωηx/c, kz,0 = ωηz/c, ky,00 = ω(1 − η2)1/2/c; i.e., they are all linearly dependent on ω and therefore not amenable to saddle point evaluation. Inversion from the FD through the second relation in (1) with use of A00FW(r, ω) from (6) yields the closed form (we only treat radiating FWs, for which η < 1, throughout this paper)
 For p ≠ 0 or q ≠ 0, the TD-FWpq inversion integral becomes
in which FFW(ω) = (4πjdxdzkypq)−1, from (6), is considered slowly varying as a function of the radian frequency ω. The exponential term with
in which kxp, kzq, and kypq are functions of ω as stated in (7), (8), and (9), is rapidly oscillatory. For these dispersive FWs with p ≠ 0 or q ≠ 0, the dominant contributions to the integral in (16) arise from the stationary (saddle) points ωpq,i of (ω) which satisfy (d/dω) ∣ = 0. For p or q ≠ 0, the real ωpq,i solutions are found to be [see Capolino and Felsen, 2003, equation (44)],
with pq = (ηxαp + ηzαq), pq = [(ηxαp + ηzαq)2 + (αp2 + αq2)(1 − η2)]1/2, and
Evaluation of the pqth TD-FW integral in (16) via the standard asymptotic formula [Felsen and Marcuvitz, 1993, pp. 382]
 As shown by Capolino and Felsen [2003, equation (57)], the observation point r ≡ (x, y, z), together with the local instantaneous frequencies and their corresponding local instantaneous wave numbers in (7)–(9), kxp(ωpq,i(t)), kzq(ωpq,i(t)) and kypq(ωpq,i(t)), define localized points of “emergence” Q′pq,i(t) = [x′pq,i(t), z′pq,i(t)] ≡ [x − ykxp(ωpq,i(t))/kypq(ωpq,i(t)), z − ykzq(ωpq,i(t))/kypq(ωpq,i(t))] from the FW-modulated equivalent continuous source distribution on the array plane (a few such points are shown in Figure 2). Thus the first signal arrival at the observation point r ≡ (x, y, z) originates at the earlier point Q′(t0) = [x′(t0), z′(t0)] ≡ [x − yηx(1 − η2)−1/2, z − yηz(1 − η2)−1/2]. Successively, for t > t0, these Q′pq,i(t) points all lie on the t-instantaneous “equal delay” ellipse defined by Capolino and Felsen [2003, equation (58)] and schematized in Figure 2. At each time t, all TD-FWpq propagate toward the observer along a t-dependent cone with the same group velocity c. For the semi-infinite array, the observer is reached only by those TD-FWs that were launched from points with xpq,i′(t) > 0 on the actual array, i.e., when the launch points lie on the solid part of the ellipse (Figure 2). The corresponding phenomenology is schematized in sections 5.2 and 5.3.
5. Time Domain Floquet Waves for the Semi-Infinite Array: Truncation of TD-FWs and Truncation-Induced TD Diffraction
 “Bulk” TD-FWs for the truncated planar array behave in the same way as those for the infinite planar array except for the presence of shadow boundaries that delimit their region of existence. Additionally, a diffracted field arising from the edge truncation at x = 0 exhibits FW-modulated q-dependent dispersive (q ≠ 0) and nondispersive (q = 0) behavior. Inversion from the FD total radiated field in (5) leads to
Three distinct cases are distinguished, based on the p,q-dependent FD dispersion relations for FWs and diffracted fields which are summarized in Table 1 and analyzed in sections 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3, respectively. In Table 1, the azimuthal angle ϕpqSB(ω) defined in (10) denotes the SB and direction of propagation of the pqth propagating FW, and kρq(ω) is the radial wave number, in (11), of the q-th diffracted field. We focus here only on propagating FWs since all the impulsively excited FD-FWpq in (6) are propagating when evaluated at their instantaneous frequencies ωpq,i(t) in (18), as shown in (23).
Table 1. Dispersive Behavior of the pqth FW and Associated Diffracted Fields
FD-FW Direction of Propagation
FD-Diffracted Field Radial Wave Number
q = p = 0
cos ϕ00(ω) = ηx/ nondispersive FW
kρ0(ω) = (ω/c) nondispersive diffracted field
q = 0 and p ≠ 0
cos ϕp0(ω)= (ωηx + αp)/kρ0(ω) dispersive FW
kρ0(ω) = (ω/c) nondispersive diffracted field
q ≠ 0
cos ϕpq(ω)= (ωηx + αp)/kρq(ω) dispersive FW
kρq(ω) = dispersive diffracted field
 For p = q = 0, the SB angle and direction of propagation of FD-FW00 do not depend on ω, and the radial wave number is linearly dependent on ω. This case is therefore nondispersive. For q = 0 and p ≠ 0, FWs are dispersive since the SB angle and direction of propagation vary with ω as shown in Table 1. The q = 0 diffracted field is nondispersive because its radial wave number kρ0(ω) still depends linearly on ω (however, this field becomes “weakly dispersive” in the transition region surrounding the SB so as to match the phase speed there of the dispersive FD-FWp0). For q ≠ 0 (and arbitrary p), both the FW and diffracted fields are dispersive since their directions of propagation vary with ω (the FW and diffracted wave numbers depend nonlinearly on ω).
 For frequency-dependent SBs (i.e., q ≠ 0 and/or p ≠ 0) and a fixed observer at ϕ, there is a particular frequency ωpqSB such that
which is determined by squaring and rearranging the expression cos ϕpqSB(ω) = cos ϕ (see (10)). One obtains [(1 − ηz2)cos2 ϕ − ηx2] − 2 (ηxαp +ηzαq cos2 ϕ) − (αp2+αq2 cos2 ϕ) = 0, with solutions
The illuminated region constraint ϕ < ϕpqSB(ω) on the FD-FWs in (24) implies that for p and/or q ≠ 0, the FD-FWs and diffracted fields are individually ω-discontinuous at ω = ωpqSB, although their sum ApqFW (r, ω)U(ϕpqSB(ω) − ϕ) + Aqd(r, ω) is continuous there. The ωpqSB radian frequencies will play an important role in the discontinuity-induced compensation mechanisms discussed in section 5.3.
 The three FWpq dispersion regimes in Table 1 parameterize subsequent high-frequency asymptotics for the FD-FW and diffracted fields in (24) away from the transition regions near the shadow boundaries where ω ≈ ωpqSB. Nonuniform asymptotics leads to the FW-modulated ray optical interpretation of the relevant wave phenomenology. Near the SBpq one needs to employ uniform asymptotics for the diffracted fields, given in (12). Far from SBs, i.e., for ω substantially different from ωpqSB, the temporal dispersion of the diffracted field (12) is dominated by exp[−jkρq(ω)ρ], as noted in Table 1, since δpq2(ω) ≫ 1 and thus F[δpq2(ω)] ≈ 1. However, in the pqth transition region, the diffracted field assumes a transitional behavior so as to match the phase speed of the FD-FWpq at the SBpq, thereby changing its dispersion properties. We recall that the expression for the qth diffracted field in (12) compensates for the SB-discontinuity of all propagating pqth FD-FWs that have been regularized via the Van der Waerden procedure (i.e., those with extracted poles in −P ≤ p ≤ P). Approaching the SBpq, δpq2(ω) ≈ 0, whence F(δpq2 ≈ 0) ≈ exp(jδpq2) ≈ 0. This locally dispersive transitional behavior permits the qth FD diffracted field to compensate for the discontinuity of the pqth FD-FW at the SBpq, as explained by Capolino et al. [2000c, section III-A]. One finds that Aqd(r, ω) ≈ sgn[ϕ − ϕpqSB(ω)]AFWpq(r, ω) ∝ exp[−j(kxpx + kypqy + kzqz)], which matches the dispersive exponent of the FD-FW. This transitional phenomenology pertains to the cases treated in sections 5.2 and 5.3.
5.1. Nondispersive TD Diffracted Field q = 0 and p = 0
 As shown in Table 1, the SB ϕ00SB is independent of ω and the Fourier inversion (24) is carried out separately for the two terms A00FW(r, ω)U(ϕ00SB − ϕ) and A0d(r, ω). Fourier inversion of A00FW(r, ω) produces the TD-FW in (15). A few steps have to be carried out before the inversion of A0d(r, ω). Referring to (12) we write (with explicit insertion of the ω-dependence), 0(ω) = + (j/dx) Σp=−∞∞ [ (1 − ηz2)1/2(cos ϕ − cos ϕ00) − αp]−1. We also decompose the “quasi nondispersive” q = 0 diffracted field in (12) into A0d (r, ω) = A00d (r, ω) + Σp≠0Ap0d(r, ω), with
arising from the 1/2 and p = 0 terms in 0(ω), and Σp≠0Ap0d taking into account all higher-order p-terms as shown later on in section 5.2. In (27), td = (ρ + ηzz)/c, δ002 = 2 ωc−1ρ sin2[(ϕ − ϕ00)/2] = ω (td − t0). The last identity is obtained using cos ϕ = x/ρ, cosϕ00 = ηx/, observing that 2ρ sin2[(ϕ − ϕ00)/2] = ρ − ρ cos(ϕ − ϕ00) = (ρ − xηx − y)/, and recalling (20). The Fourier inversion of (27) can be carried out in closed form via an exact transform based on the formula (see expression before (23) and (50) of Capolino and Felsen  followed by a convolution),
which leads to
Near the SB ϕ = ϕ00 (where td = t0) we have = sin((ϕ − ϕ00)/2) → 0, which compensates for the discontinuity in the denominator of the second term in (29) (see Figure 3). The TD Fourier inversion of all the other p-terms (with q = 0) Ap0d(r, ω) is treated next.
5.2. “Weakly Dispersive” TD Diffracted Fields With q = 0 and p ≠ 0
 To perform the asymptotic inversion of Ap0T ≡ Ap0FW (r, ω) U[ϕp0SB(ω) − ϕ] + Ap0d(r, ω) for q = 0 and p ≠ 0, we treat FW portion as in section 4.2 and use an approximate form of the diffracted field valid when the space-time position of the observer is in the vicinity of the SB. The relevant expression for the FD diffracted field
arises from the higher-order p-terms in 0(ω) (above (27)), combined with (12), in which kρ0(ω), kz0(ω), ϕp0(ω) and δp02(ω) are all functions of ω. The corresponding inverted TD-FW, valid away from and near the SB, is obtained as in section 4.2 for the infinite array, using the dominant instantaneous frequencies ωp0,i(t) also in the shadow boundary truncation functions U[ϕp0(ωp0,i(t)) − ϕ], i = 1, 2. A simple expression for the TD diffracted fields p0d(r, t) can be derived when the observer is close to the moving SBp0 where ω ≈ ωp0SB. Therefore ϕ ≈ ϕp0(ω) in (31). and the argument of the transition function F becomes δp0(ω ≈ ωp0SB) ≈ 0 (see (14)), yielding F ≈ exp(jδp02), as verified from the relations F(δ2) = ±erfc(±ejπ/4δ), erfc(z) = (2/)∫du, with the upper/lower signs applying for ℜe(ejπ/4δ) [Capolino et al., 2000b; Rojas, 1987]. Noting that −kρ0(ω)ρ + δp02(ω) = −[kxp(ω)x + kyp0(ω)y] (using (10)), the resulting inversion of Ap0T(r, ω) near the SB becomes
were (ω), defined in (17), takes into account the phase terms, and
is the slowly varying part of Ap0T(r, ω) near the SB.
 As in section 4.2, the dominant contributions to the integral in the high-frequency range arise from the stationary (saddle) points ωp0,i(t) of (ω) given in (18). In (33), erfc is considered as an amplitude function as did Capolino and Felsen , [Carin and Felsen , and Felsen and Carin  because over its effective range ϕp0(ω) ≈ ϕ (in the proximity of the SB), its phase varies slowly. (Away from the SB, the phase varies rapidly; there, however, the FW field is not discontinuous and the diffracted field may either be neglected without appreciable loss of accuracy or evaluated by other techniques. Better approximations for the diffracted field away from the shadow boundaries are beyond the scope of the present investigation). The asymptotic evaluation of (32) is carried out via the formula in (21), with (33), and (d2/dω2)∣ωp0,i = y(1 − η2)2c−4p02kyp0,i−3. This leads to p0,iT(r, t) = Σi=12p0,iT, with
in which p0,iFW(r, t) is the same as in (23). The Heaviside function U terminates the TD-FWp0 domain of existence at the moving shadow boundary plane ϕ = ϕp0,i(t) ≡ ϕp0(ωp0,i(t)) with cos ϕp0(ωp0,i(t)) = kxp(ωp0,i(t))/kρ0(ωp0,i(t)) = [ηx +αpc/ωp0,i(t)]/. The diffracted field is
where ωp0,i(t), and therefore ϕp0,i(t), kρ0,i(t) ≡ ωp0,i(t)/c and δp0,i(t) ≡ δp0(ωp0,i(t)), are functions of t. We refer to Figure 4 and its caption for the moving SB behavior for t ≥ t0. At a time t, an arbitrarily located observer is always reached by the diffracted fields p0,id, i = 1,2 but only by those truncated FWs p0,iFW that originate at points xp0,i′(t) > 0 and illuminate the observation point (see schematic in Figures 2 and 4).
5.3. Strongly Dispersive Diffracted Fields With q ≠ 0
 Due to the dispersive behavior of the diffracted fields with q≠ 0, inversion into the TD is carried out via local instantaneous diffracted frequencies. As previously, “far” from the SBpq (with arbitrary p), the diffracted field dispersion is dominated by exp[−j kρq(ω)ρ], (see (12) and Table 1). In that domain, where ω differs substantially from ωpqSB, the Fourier inversion (24) of the Aqd (r, ω) term in (12) yields
with kzq(ω) and kρq(ω) given in (8) and (11), respectively, takes into account the phase terms, whereas Fd(ω) = D(ω)/[4π dz] is the slowly varying part of Aqd (r, ω), with D(ω) denoting the expression inside the brackets in (12). The dispersion relation in (37) coincides with that of the different but analogous canonical problem of Felsen and Capolino . For these dispersive diffracted fields, the dominant contributions to the integral in (36) arise from the real stationary (saddle) point solutions ωq,id of d(ω), which satisfy (d/dω) = 0 [see Felsen and Capolino, 2000, Appendix A],
and τd defined in (30). For each FW order q, the two real solutions i = 1,2 yield the two field contributions shown in Figure 5. These diffracted field local instantaneous frequency solutions ωq,id(r, t) are the same as those of Felsen and Capolino [2000, equation (28)] and they match the order of the ωpq,i(r, t) solutions in (18) at a given point r and a given instant t in the causal domain τ′ > τd or t > td = ηzz/c + τd. At turn-on t = td, ∣ωq,id∣ → ∞ for all q (see Figure 6). The frequencies increase with FW mode index q, decrease with time t, and approach their cutoff value ωq,id(t → ∞) = ωq,id,cutoff = c(1 − ηz2)−1[αqηz +(−1)i ∣αq∣], defined by ∣kzq(ω)∣ = ∣k(ω)∣ or, alternatively, by kρq(ω) = 0 (see (11)). The corresponding instantaneous wave numbers kq,id(t) ≡ k(ωq,id(r, t)), kzq,id(t) ≡ kzq(ωq,id(r, t)), and kρq,id(t) ≡ kρq(ωq,id(r, t)), obtained from (8) and (11), are all real for t > td, and the FD diffracted fields are all propagating when evaluated at ωdq,i(r, t) since ∣kq,id(t)| > ∣kzq,id(t)∣ [see Felsen and Capolino, 2000, section V-B]. The points of emergence zq,i′d (t) located on the edge (see Figure 5) are defined by zq,i′d (t) = z − ρkzq,id(t)/kρq,id(t) = z − (1 − ηz)−1[ηzτ′ + (−1)isgn(αq) ] which depend only on the sign of q. The asymptotic evaluation of the integral (36) is carried out via the formula in (21)–(22) (adapted to the dq format). From (17) and (38), one finds d (ωdq,i(t)) = αqzq,i′d(t) and (d2/dω2) d∣ = −ραq2/[c2(kρq,id(t))3], which yields qd(r, t) = Σi=12q,id, with
where D(ω) is the expression inside the brackets in (12). The resulting expression in (40) is restricted to early observation times because it is based on the inversion of the high-frequency representation of the FD-FW on the right side of (24) and (36) [see Felsen and Marcuvita, 1973]. TD-FW with q ≠ 0 are evaluated via their local instantaneous frequencies ωpq,i(t) in (18), as in section 4.2 when ωpq,i(t) differs substantially from ωSBpq. The only addition is that the U function in (24) is also evaluated at the FW instantaneous frequency leading to Σi=12pq,iFW(r, t)U[ϕpq,i(t) − ϕ], in which the TD-FW pq,iFW(r, t) is the same as in (23) and the moving shadow boundary ϕpq,i(t) ≡ ϕpq(ωpq,i(t) with cosϕpq(ωpq,i(t)) = kxp(ωpq,i(t))/kρq(ωpq,i(t)). We refer to Figure 4 and its caption for the moving SB behavior for t ≥ t0. We show hereafter that the condition “ωpq,i(t) substantially different from ωpqSB” is equivalent to “ωq,id(t) substantially different from ωSBpq.”
 In the SBpq transition region, where the local instantaneous frequencies ωq,id(t) are close to ωpqSB, the simple asymptotics above cannot be applied because Fd(ω) in (36) is now rapidly oscillating for ω ≈ ωpqSB, one has δpq2(ω) ≈0 and F ≈ exp(jδpq2), which introduces the additional phase term exp(jδpq2). Recalling (14) and that δpq2 = kρqρ[1 − cos(ϕ − ϕpq)] = kρq ρ − kxpx − kypqy (using (10)), one observes that
where ψ(ω) given in (17) represents the total phase (including exp(jω t)) of Aqd(r, ω), for ω ≈ ωpqSB. This equality states that in the transition region, the dominant frequencies must satisfy dψ/dω = 0, leading to ωpq,i(t) in (18). This is not surprising since we have already encountered the same phenomenology in section 5.2 for q = 0 and p≠ 0; therefore, the asymptotic evaluation for an observer in the space-time-dependent pqth transition region can be carried out in a similar fashion. Here, however, we note that dδpq2/dω = 2δpq·(dδpq/dω) = 0 for ω = ωpqSB and thus from (41), dψd/dω = dψ/dω for ω = ωpqSB. This demonstrates that if for a certain t = tpqSB, one has ωpq,i(tpqSB) = ωpqSB, then also
In other words, the asymptotic evaluation carried out above for ωq,id(t) substantially different from ωpqSB automatically patches onto the asymptotic evaluation in the transition region ω ≈ ωpqSB, when the observer is located in space-time at the SBpq (see section 5.2). Therefore the solution for qd(r, t) in (40) can be used for all (r, t), inside and outside the transition regions.
 Behavior of local instantaneous frequencies: Space limitations prevent coverage of all possible combinations of phasing ηx and ηz, and FW indexes p, q. We only consider positive frequencies, i.e., those with i = 2. The behavior of negative frequencies (i = 1) is inferred by noting that ωpq,1(r, t) = −ω−p,−q,2(r, t) and ωq,1d(r, t) = −ω−q,2d(r, t) (see (18) and (38), respectively). Since td ≥ t0, the diffracted signal reaches the observer always later than (or simultaneously with, for ϕ = ϕ00) the TD-FW signal, as is also confirmed observing the domain of the real instantaneous frequencies in Figure 6. There, the dynamics of both FW and diffracted field local instantaneous frequencies is compared for the simple but representative nonphased case ηx = ηz = 0. Width dz used for normalization, the x-domain interelement spacing is dx = 0.1 dz, the observer is placed at r ≡ (x, y, z) = (−0.05dz, 8dz, 0) and time and frequency are normalized through T = dz/c. As predicted above, for certain t = tpqSB, one has ωq,id(tSB) = ωpq,i(tSB) = ωpqSB, which means that at t = tpqSB the pqth moving SB intercepts the stationary observer at r. In that vicinity, the qd behavior undergoes a dispersive transition that compensates for the truncation of the TD-FWpq, and restores total field continuity at time t = tpqSB. Except for the moving SBs, the compensation mechanism in the TD is equal to that in the FD [see Capolino et al., 2000c, section III-A], for q ≠ 0.
6. Total “Observable” Field With Band-Limited Excitation
 We now construct the total field radiated by a planar semi-infinite array due to a physically realizable band-limited (BL) pulsed dipole excitation (t) with spectrum G(ω). Accordingly, the factor multiplying δ(x′ − ndx)δ(z′ − mdz) in (2) becomes G(ω) exp(−jk(ηxx′ + ηzz′)) for the FD dipole currents and (t − (ηxx′ + ηzz′)/c) for the TD dipole currents. The total BL response tot,BL(r, t) of the semi-infinite planar array is then obtained by (4) or by convolving the total TD impulse response with the BL signal, tot,BL(r, t) = tot(r, t) ⊗ (t), with ⊗ denoting the convolution ⊗ ≡ 1/(2π)∫−∞∞(t′)(t − t′) dt′. The total field radiated by the semi-infinite array is thus represented as
with terms in brackets pertaining to the results in sections 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3, respectively. In particular, 00FW,BL(r, t) = ⊗ 00FW and 00d,BL(r, t) = ⊗ 00d are obtained by numerical integration since they do not have a dominant frequency. All other terms with p ≠ 0 and/or q ≠ 0, in the second and third brackets in (43) have a dominant instantaneous frequency which allows the convolution to be replaced by sampling the excitation G(ω) in (4) at that frequency. In particular, p0,iFW,BL(r, t) = G[ωp0,i(t)]p0,iFW and p0,id,BL(r, t) = G[ωp0,i(t)] p0,id in the second bracket, while pq,iFW,BL(r, t) = G[ωpq,i(t)] pq,iFW and qd,BL(r, t) = G[ωq,id(t)]q,id in the third bracket. As noted in section 5.2, the term p0,id has been evaluated using its dispersion relation inside the moving SB transition region, and therefore it is set equal to zero outside, where it is subdominant (see also Capolino and Felsen [2002, section VI] for an equivalent argument).
 We have so far avoided the “dilemma” posed by the presence of exponential phase factors (already observed and resolved by Felsen and Capolino  and Capolino and Felsen [2002, 2003]) which render all (pq, i) TD wavefields in (43) complex. Guided by those earlier resolutions of the dilemma, we construct a real TD “observable” field by (+p, +q, 1), (−p, −q, 2) pairing. This is suggested by the symmetry property ωpq,1(t) = −ω−p,−q,2(t) and ωq,1d(t) = −ω−q,2d(t) for FW and diffracted field instantaneous frequencies, respectively (see (18) and (38)). While for FW one can follow the arguments of Capolino and Felsen , for diffracted fields the situation is more involved since the argument of the Fresnel function F in (35) and (40) (inside D(ω)) is negative for negative frequencies, i.e., for i = 1, and the property F(−x) = F*(x) for x real must be used. In particular, referring to the impulse-radiated field, one obtains p0,2FW+−p0,1FW = 2ℜeÂp0,2FW, p0,2d + −p0,1d = 2ℜe Âp0,2d, for the second bracket, and pq,2FW + −p,−q,1FW = 2ℜ eÂpq,2FW, q,2d+−q,1d = 2ℜ eÂq,2d, for the third bracket. Analogous relations hold for the BL field counterparts in (43), since G(−ω) = G*(ω), as required due to the real excitation (t). Thus in (43) one should formally replace Σi=12 by 2ℜe.
6.1. Numerical Examples
 Preliminary numerical experiments have been carried out for broad band, but band-limited, pulsed dipole excitation of a nonphased truncated dipole array in order to test the accuracy of the asymptotic solutions (43), and to compare the results with a reference solution obtained by element-by-element summation over the pulsed BL radiations from all dipoles, i.e., the (m, n) sum over the BL Green's functions (t − Rmn/c)/(4πRmn), with Rmn = ((x − ndx)2 + (z − mdz)2 + y2)1/2, m, n = 0, ±1, ±2,… The array is “infinite” along z but truncated along x at x = 0 and x = 139 dx. The (m, n)-series has been truncated at ∣m∣, ∣n∣ < 139, which includes all nonnegligible element radiations along z. Interelement spacings are such that dz = 10 dx in order to highlight the new phenomena (with respect to the semi-infinite line array of Capolino and Felsen ) due to the z-dispersion relation for diffracted fields (since dz ≫ dx, all fields with p ≠ 0 are negligible for the chosen BL excitation). Both x = 0 and x = 139dx truncation effects have been accounted for, treating the actual strip array as the difference between two semi-infinite arrays. BL excitation: normalized Rayleigh pulse (t) = ℜ e[j/(j + ωMt/4)5] (i.e., (0) = 1); G(ω) = π(6ωM)−1 (j4ω/ωM)4 exp(−4∣ω∣/ωM); central radian frequency ωM = πc/dz (λM ≡ 2πc/ωM = 2dz) in Figure 7a, and ωM = 2πc/dz (λM = dz) in Figure 7b. Observer location: r ≡ (x, y, z) = (−0.05dz, 8dz, 0) so that ϕ = 93.6°; since ϕ0q = 90°, diffracted fields are in transition. Since U(ϕ0q − ϕ) = 0, no FW0q are present. Fields tot,BL(r, t) in (43) are plotted versus normalized time t/T, with T = dz/c. The near coincidence, at the observer, of the FW turn-on times t0/T = 8 and the (x = 0) edge-diffracted arrival td/T = 8.02 also implies that diffracted fields are in transition. The included asymptotic terms p = 0 and ∣q∣ ≤ 1 (solid curve) adequately reproduce the reference solution (dotted curve), demonstrating good convergence of the TD-FW representation in both cases a) and b). To verify the compensation mechanism discussed in sections 5.1 and 5.3, a second numerical test has been performed with the observer at r ≡ (+0.05dz, 8dz, 0) slightly to the right of the SB0q (now ϕ = 86.4°), and therefore reached by the TD-FW0q. The resulting fields agree with those in Figures 7a and 7b, thus confirming field continuity across the SB.
 The motivation and methodologies for the present study having been summarized in the abstract and introduction, we re-affirm that our basic approach to parameterizing and understanding periodicity-induced FW-based TD dispersion can be extended to successively more complicated planar array configurations. The results are again appealingly expressed in terms of periodicity-modulated TD GTD-like wave phenomena, nonuniform outside and uniformized inside transition regions, with novel interpretations of the truncation-induced edge diffractions. Work is in progress to refine and extend the present preliminary asymptotic results beyond the parameter ranges included here, and to perform comprehensive numerical tests over broad parametric excursion, with emphasis on validation and error estimates. The outcomes will be submitted for separate publication. The final canonical problem to be addressed is the TD counterpart of the FD plane sectoral array of Capolino et al. [2000a] and Maci et al. , which through inclusion of corner diffraction, lays the foundation for treating polygonal periodic planar array configurations.
 L.B. Felsen acknowledges partial support from ODDR and E under MURI grants ARO DAAG55-97-1-0013 and AFOSR F49620-96-1-0028, from the Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under award EEC9986821, from the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation, Jerusalem, Israel, under grant 9900448, and from Polytechnic University.