At present, two Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instruments on board the NASA Terra and Aqua Spacecraft platforms are operational for global remote sensing of the land, ocean, and atmosphere. In this paper, we describe an algorithm for water vapor derivations using several MODIS near-IR channels. The derivations are made over areas that have reflective surfaces in the near-IR, such as clear land areas, clouds, and oceanic areas with Sun glint. The algorithm relies on observations of water vapor attenuation of near-IR solar radiation reflected by surfaces and clouds. Techniques employing ratios of water vapor absorbing channels centered near 0.905, 0.936, and 0.940 μm with atmospheric window channels at 0.865 and 1.24 μm are used. The ratios partially remove the effects of variation of surface reflectance with wavelengths and result in the atmospheric water vapor transmittances. The column water vapor amounts are derived from the transmittances based on theoretical calculations and using lookup table procedures. Typical errors in the derived water vapor values are in the range between 5% and 10%. The daily “pixel-based” near-IR water vapor product, which is a standard MODIS level 2 data product, at the 1-km spatial resolution of the MODIS instrument, and the daily, 8-day, and monthly near-IR water vapor products, which are standard MODIS level 3 products, at a 1° by 1° latitude-longitude grid globally are now routinely produced at a NASA computing facility. We present samples of water vapor images and comparisons to ground-based measurements by microwave radiometers.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
 Historically, remote sensing of water vapor profiles from space was made using IR emission channels. The results depended in part on the initial guess for the temperature and moisture profiles used in the inversion [Susskind et al., 1984]. Column water vapor amounts over the ocean were retrieved from IR emission channels in the 11–13 μm spectral region using “split window” techniques [Chesters et al., 1983] and from microwave emission measurements [Prabhakara et al., 1982; Ferraro et al., 1996]. The “split window” techniques also work well over land areas covered by green vegetation. When the apparent surface temperature, which is a function of surface emissivity and skin temperature, is about equal to the average temperature of the boundary layer, where most of the water vapor usually resides, infrared and microwave remote sensing will not be sensitive to the boundary layer water vapor. In recent years, a number of papers have reported water vapor retrieval algorithms, which use backscattered solar radiation near 1 μm measured with aircraft and satellite instruments [e.g., Conel et al., 1988; Gao and Goetz, 1990; Frouin et al., 1990; Kaufman and Gao, 1992; Borel et al., 1996; Bouffies et al., 1997; Thai and Schonermark, 1998; Vesperini et al., 1999].
 The MODIS instruments currently onboard the NASA Earth Observing System (EOS) Terra and Aqua Spacecrafts are NASA facility instruments [Salomonson et al., 1989; King et al., 1992; Asrar and Greenstone, 1995] designed for global monitoring of the land, ocean, and atmosphere. Three near-IR channels located within the 0.94-μm water vapor band absorption region were implemented on MODIS for water vapor remote sensing. The implementation of the two water vapor channels centered at 0.905 and 0.94 μm was largely based on the work of Gao and Goetz  and Kaufman and Gao  with water vapor retrievals from high spatial resolution hyperspectral imaging data collected by the Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) [Vane et al., 1993; Green et al., 1998] from a NASA ER-2 aircraft at an altitude of 20 km. In this paper, we describe the algorithm for deriving column water vapor amounts from measurements of near-IR solar radiation reflected by Earth's surfaces or clouds with the MODIS instruments.
2. Instrument Characteristics
 The MODIS instrument has 36 channels covering the spectral region between 0.4 and 15 μm. Five near-IR channels in the 0.8–1.3 μm spectral region are useful for remote sensing of water vapor. The positions and widths of these channels from the original MODIS design specifications are given in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1. Two atmospheric water vapor transmittance spectra for the tropical and subarctic winter models [Kneizys et al., 1988] with a solar zenith angle of 45 degrees and a nadir-looking geometry are also shown in Figure 1. The channels at 0.865 and 1.24 μm positioned to avoid atmospheric gaseous absorption are for remote sensing of vegetation and clouds. The channels at 0.936, 0.940, and 0.905 μm are water vapor absorption channels with decreasing absorption coefficients. The strong absorption channel at 0.936 μm is most useful for dry conditions, while the weak absorption channel at 0.905 μm is most useful for very humid conditions, or low solar elevation.
Table 1. Positions and Widths of Five MODIS Near-IR Channels Used in Water Vapor Retrievals
3. Algorithm Descriptions
 In this section we describe an algorithm for deriving column water vapor amounts from MODIS near-IR data from both the theoretical and practical points of view.
3.1. Theoretical Description
 The remote sensing method is based on detecting the absorption by water vapor of the reflected solar radiation after it has been transmitted down to the surface, reflected at the surface, and transmitted up through the atmosphere to the sensor. The equivalent total vertical amount of water vapor can be derived from a comparison between the reflected solar radiation in the absorption channel, and the reflected solar radiation in nearby nonabsorption channels. Descriptions of techniques for water vapor remote sensing using near-IR channels were previously reported [e.g., Gao and Goetz, 1990; Frouin et al., 1990; Kaufman and Gao, 1992; Gao et al., 1992; Borel et al., 1996; Thai and Schonermark, 1998; Vesperini et al., 1999]. Below we describe the retrieving techniques relevant to the MODIS implementation.
 The solar radiation between 0.86 and 1.24 μm on the Sun-surface-sensor path is subjected to atmospheric water vapor absorption, aerosol scattering, and surface reflection. In order to derive column water vapor from measurements of solar radiation reflected by the surface, the absorption and scattering properties of the atmosphere and the surface near 1 μm must be taken into consideration.
3.1.1. Atmospheric Absorption and Scattering in the 0.86–1.24 μm Range
where λ is wavelength, LSensor(λ) the radiance at the sensor, LPath(λ) the path scattered radiance, μ0 the cosine of solar zenith angle, E0(λ) the extra-terrestrial solar flux, T(λ) the total atmospheric transmittance, which is equal to the product of the atmospheric transmittance from the Sun to the Earth's surface and that from the surface to the satellite sensor, and ρ(λ) the surface bi-directional reflectance. Equation (1) is simplified in a sense that photons that are reflected from the surface more than once are being ignored. This feedback mechanism involves back scattering to the surface by the atmosphere. Because aerosol optical thicknesses are typically small in the near-IR region, the feedback effect is usually small. The second term on the right hand side of equation (1) is the directly reflected solar radiation. LDirect is used to represent this component. The term πLSensor(λ)/[μ0 E0(λ)] is defined as the apparent reflectance ρ*(λ) in this paper.
 The term T(λ) contains information about the total amount of water vapor in the combined Sun-surface-sensor path. E0(λ) is a known quantity. Near 1 μm, Rayleigh scattering is negligible and the main contribution to LPath(λ) is scattering by aerosols. LPath(λ) in the 1 μm region is usually a few percent of the direct reflected solar radiation. Because most aerosols are located in the lower 2 km of the atmosphere and the same is true for atmospheric water vapor, the single and multiple scattered radiation by aerosols is also subjected to water vapor absorption. As a result, LPath(λ) contains water vapor absorption features [Gao and Goetz, 1990]. We assume that LPath(λ) can be treated approximately as an unspecified fraction of direct reflected solar radiation when the aerosol concentrations are low. With this assumption we can derive column water vapor amounts from satellite data without the need for modeling the single and multiple scattering effects.
3.1.2. Surface Reflectances Near 1 μm
 MODIS images the land, ocean and clouds. Most land is either covered by soils, rocks, vegetation, snow, or ice. If the surface reflectance is either constant or varies in a linear fashion with wavelength, we can use a two- or three- channel ratio algorithm for water vapor retrievals. Figure 2 shows reflectance curves of five major types of soil [Condit, 1970; Stoner and Baumgardner, 1980]. The reflectances between 0.85 and 1.25 μm change approximately linearly with wavelength. Similar linearity is observed in reflectance spectra of common rocks and minerals. The largest deviation from linearity is observed in reflectance spectra of iron-rich soils and minerals. These materials have broad electronic bands, which are related to the Fe3+ transition and are centered near 0.86 μm. Curve 3 in Figure 2 shows such a broad band feature in the spectral region between approximately 0.8 and 1.25 μm. Figure 3 shows vegetation and snow reflectance spectra [Bowker et al., 1985] normalized near 0.86 μm. The vegetation spectrum has liquid water bands centered at approximately 0.98 and 1.20 μm. The snow spectrum has ice absorption bands centered approximately at 1.04 and 1.24 μm. For comparison, Figure 3 also shows a calculated water vapor transmittance spectrum. The positions of water vapor, liquid water and ice absorption bands are shifted relative to each other. The shifting of the vibrational bands is due to increases in intermolecular forces as the water molecules become more organized in the liquid and solid states.
 The ocean is highly absorbing at wavelengths longer than 0.8 μm. The MODIS near-IR channels receive very little radiances over the dark ocean surfaces. Reliable water vapor retrievals over the dark ocean surfaces from the near-IR channel measurements cannot be made because of poor signal-to-noise ratios. However, fog, stratus clouds, or Sun glint regions are very bright and spectrally flat over the 0.85–1.25 μm spectral region.
3.1.3. Transmittance Derivation Using Channel Ratio Techniques
 The reflectance values at a given wavelength are quite different for different types of surfaces, as seen from Figures 2 and 3. Therefore it is not possible to get the water vapor transmittances (see equation (1)) from radiances of individual absorption channels. However, if the surface reflectances are constant with wavelength, a two-channel ratio of an absorption channel with a window channel gives the water vapor transmittance of the absorption channel. For example, the transmittance of the channel at 0.94 μm can be expressed as
if the surface reflectances are constant with wavelength and if the path radiances can be treated as small fractions of directly reflected solar radiances.
 If surface reflectances vary linearly with wavelength, a three-channel ratio of an absorption channel with a combination of two window channels gives the water vapor transmittance of the absorption channel. For example, the transmittance of the channel at 0.94 μm can be written as
where C1 is equal to 0.8, and C2 0.2. The denominator in equation (3) is, in fact, the estimated 0.94-μm reflectance in the absence of water vapor absorption based on the two atmospheric window channels centered at 0.865 and 1.24 μm through linear interpolation.
 For most of the soil spectra in Figure 2 (except the iron-rich soil spectrum) with quite linear spectral dependence in the 0.8–1.3 μm wavelength region, the denominator in equation (3) would properly predict the surface reflectances at 0.94 μm, and equation (3) would give excellent estimates of water vapor transmittance for the 0.94-μm channel from MODIS data acquired over these types of soils. For the iron-rich soil spectrum in Figure 2 and the vegetation and snow reflectance spectra (scaled) in Figure 3, although they do not vary linearly with wavelength in the 0.8–1.3 μm wavelength region, the denominator in equation (3) would also allow reasonable estimates of surface reflectances at 0.94 μm with errors typically less than about 4%, and equation (3) would still give reasonable estimates of water vapor transmittances for the 0.94-μm channel from MODIS data acquired over iron-rich soils, green vegetation, and snow. Further discussion of the errors associated with the assumption of linearity of surface refletcances in the 0.8–1.3 μm is included in section 5.
3.1.4. Water Vapor Retrievals Over Land and Oceanic Areas With Sun Glint
 Both the two-channel and three-channel ratio techniques are used to derive atmospheric transmittances of the absorption channels, and subsequently the column water vapor amounts over clear land areas and extended oceanic areas with sun glint. The three-channel ratio technique is used for water vapor derivations over clear land pixels, while the two-channel ratio technique is used over oceanic areas with sun glint. The two-channel and three-channel ratios are calculated from radiances of the five MODIS channels centered at 0.865, 0.905, 0.936, 0.94, and 1.24 μm. Lookup tables containing values of two-channel and three-channel ratios and total amounts of water vapor were precomputed using a line-by-line atmospheric transmittance code (W. Ridgway, personal communications 2001), the HITRAN2000 spectroscopic database [Rothman et al., 1998], and the actual filter transmission functions of the five MODIS channels. Figure 4 shows examples of the simulated two-channel ratios (absorption channel/window channel) as a function of total water vapor amount in the Sun-surface-sensor path. The combined two-way water vapor amount is derived from values of two-channel and three-channel ratios calculated from the MODIS data using a table-searching procedure. The derived total water vapor amount, W*, is then converted to the vertical column water vapor amount, W, based on the solar and the observational geometries using the equation
where θs is the solar zenith angle, and θv the view zenith angle.
3.1.5. Water Vapor Retrievals Over Clouds
 When clouds are present, the MODIS channels in the 0.8–2.5 μm region contain information about absorptions due to water vapor above and within clouds. This is illustrated in Figure 5, in which sample cumulus and cirrus cloud spectra over water surfaces measured with the AVIRIS instrument [Vane et al., 1993] from an ER-2 aircraft at an altitude of 20 km. The band passes of a few MODIS channels are marked in thick horizontal bars. Because cirrus clouds are much higher than cumulus clouds, the depth of the absorption feature of the 0.94-μm water vapor band for the cirrus spectrum is much smaller than that for the cumulus spectrum.
 In the presence of optically thick clouds, the two-channel ratios (see equation (2)) provide information about absorptions due to water vapor molecules on the Sun-cloud-sensor path. The absorption effect is enhanced slightly due to multiple scattering of solar radiation within clouds. In order to infer the actual number of water vapor molecules that interacted with solar radiation, the cloud top height must be known, because molecular absorption depends on atmospheric pressures. The cloud top heights for low level water clouds are difficult to determine accurately from passive remote sensing data. Therefore we retrieve “effective” column water vapor amounts from the two-channel ratio values for pixels with thick water clouds by assuming that the cloud top heights are at the sea level. These effective water vapor amounts can, in principle, be used to estimate the water vapor absorption effects in MODIS channels shorter than about 4 μm, provided that water vapor transmittances for different MODIS channels are calculated with the same assumption of cloud top heights being at the sea level. The cloud top heights for upper level thick cirrus clouds can be retrieved from MODIS IR emission channels [Menzel et al., 1992; King et al., 1992]. From the two-channel ratio values plus the estimated IR cloud heights, the column water vapor amount over thick cirrus pixels can be retrieved.
 In the presence of optically thin clouds (usually ice clouds), an index of column water vapor amount above and within cirrus clouds can be established. Our recent analysis of AVIRIS data acquired over water surfaces indicates that the ratio of the radiance from the 0.94-μm channel against the radiance from the 0.865-μm channel provides information about water vapor above and within cirrus clouds. Because the water surface away from sun glint regions is black above 0.8 μm, it has no contribution to the two-channel ratio. The sensitivities of MODIS IR channels near 14 μm are not sufficiently high for reliable detection of thin cirrus clouds with effective IR emissivities less than about 0.04. The estimation of the heights of such thin cirrus clouds using CO2 slicing techniques [Zhang and Menzel, 2002] is not possible. For slightly thicker cirrus clouds, the CO2 slicing technique can sometimes successively estimate the heights of such clouds, but often has a tendency to underestimate the height of such clouds due to intrinsic absorption, emission, and partial transparent nature of cirrus clouds. On the basis of these considerations, we have concluded that thin cirrus cloud heights will have to be assumed at a few discrete height levels based on climatology. From the two-channel ratios and the assumed cirrus heights, the upper level water vapor index can, in principle, be established.
3.2. Practical Implementation
 Our level 2 near-IR water vapor algorithm requires input data sets from standard MODIS data cubes and associated ancillary data. The inputs from MODIS data cubes are radiances of five MODIS channels centered at 0.865, 0.905, 0.936, 0.94, and 1.24 μm. The inputs from ancillary data are solar zenith angle, view zenith angle, relative azimuth angle between the solar and viewing directions, cloud mask, land-water flag, surface elevation, and surface temperature. The required angular information is for converting the total two-way path water vapor amount to the vertical column amount. The cloud mask is used to indicate whether a pixel is clear or cloudy. The land-water flag is used to show if the pixel is over land or water. Both the cloud mask and land-water flag are used in our selection of either the two-channel or the three-channel ratio method in the retrievals. Because molecular absorption depends on pressure, surface elevations in digital form are used in our algorithm for pressure scaling of water vapor amounts (the same scheme as that used in LOWTRAN7 [Kneizys et al., 1988] and MODTRAN [Berk et al., 1989; Anderson et al., 2000]). Surface temperature is used in the selection of an appropriate model atmosphere for the retrieval.
 Atmospheric water vapor has very different absorption coefficients over the band passes of MODIS channels centered near 0.936, 0.940, and 0.905 μm. As a result, the three channels have different water vapor sensitivities under the same atmospheric condition. The strong absorption channel at 0.936 μm is most sensitive under dry conditions, while the weak absorption channel at 0.905 μm is most sensitive under humid conditions. Under a given atmospheric condition, the derived water vapor values from the three channels can be different. A mean water vapor value (W) is obtained according to the equation:
where W1, W2, and W3 are water vapor values derived from the 0.936, 0.940, and 0.915 μm channels, respectively, and f1, f2, and f3 are the corresponding weighting functions. Our currently adopted weighting functions are based on the sensitivity of the transmission (Ti) in each of the channels (i) to the total precipitable water vapor (W): ηi = ∣ΔTi/ΔW∣. The weighting functions, fi, are defined as the normalized values of ηi:
These weighting functions are computed numerically from simulated curves of transmittances versus precipitable water. Figure 6 shows the dependence of fi on the total precipitable water vapor for the three filters.
 The output from our level 2 near-IR water vapor algorithm includes the column water vapor amount on a pixel-by-pixel basis and an associated quality assurance parameter that indicates whether a pixel is clear or cloudy. The column water vapor amounts are derived over clear land areas of the globe, and above clouds over both land and ocean. Water vapor estimates are also made over extended glint oceanic areas. In addition to the level 2 near-IR water vapor product, the level 3 near-IR water vapor products for clear areas and cloudy areas are produced on the daily, 8-day, and monthly mean basis at a 1° × 1° latitude-longitude equal angle grid globally.
 The algorithm has been used for operational retrievals of column water vapor amounts from MODIS data. The level 2 and level 3 data products have been stored at the Goddard Distributed Archive Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. Researchers interested in the products can obtain them from this data center. Below we show a few examples of the level 2 “pixel-based” water vapor images and the level-3 “monthly mean” water vapor images.
4.1. A Sample Level 2 Water Vapor Image From Terra MODIS
 The Terra MODIS instrument was launched into orbit on 18 December 1999. It started to collect scientific data in late February of 2000. Figure 7 shows an example of water vapor retrievals from the Terra MODIS near-IR channels located within and around the 0.94-μm water vapor band. The left panel shows a false color image processed from the MODIS channels centered at 0.645 μm (red), 0.86 μm (false green), and 0.47 μm (blue). The lower left part of the scene covers a major portion of the Indian Continent. The lower right part covers a portion of the Bay of Bengal. The upper part of the scene covers Nepal. The MODIS data were measured on 2 March 2000 at UTC 0525. The middle panel shows the column water vapor image derived from the MODIS data. The right panel shows an image of surface elevations for the scene. By comparing the middle panel image with the right panel image, it is seen that over the high elevation Himalayas mountain regions, the water vapor amounts are quite small (<1 cm). Over the low elevation Indian Continent, the water vapor amounts are significantly larger. The high elevation Himalayas mountains block the northward movement of water vapor originated from the Bay of Bengal, and force the water vapor to remain in the Indian Continent.
4.2. A Sample Level 2 Water Vapor Image From Aqua MODIS
 The MODIS instrument onboard the Aqua spacecraft was launched into orbit on May 4, 2002. The Aqua MODIS started to collect scientific data in late June of 2002. Figure 8 shows a sample of water vapor derivations from the Aqua MODIS data. In Figure 8a we show a color image processed from the MODIS channels centered at 0.645 μm (red), 0.55 μm (green), and 0.47 μm (blue). The top part of the scene covers major portions of Spain and Portugal. The bottom part covers parts of Morocco and Algeria. Atlantic Ocean is seen in the left part of the image. The Mediterranean Sea is seen in the right part of the image. The Aqua MODIS data were acquired on 17 July 2002 at UTC 1350. In Figure 8b we show the column water vapor image derived from the Aqua MODIS data set. The areas over land and close to the land-water boundaries have higher concentrations of water vapor. The desert areas in the bottom right portions of the scene have far less water vapor than the coastal areas. It is quite easy to see spatial variations of water vapor from this image.
4.3. Sample Level 3 Water Vapor Images Over the United States From Terra MODIS
 Through analysis of our level 3 daily, 8-day, and monthly mean water vapor images at a 1° × 1° latitude-longitude equal angle grid, we have found that the monthly mean level 3 images allow easy observations of seasonal variations of water vapor distributions. Figures 9a shows a level 3 water vapor image over the continental United States, portions of Mexico and Canada for January of 2001. In this winter month, most parts of the United States have column water vapor amounts less than 1.5 cm. The State of Florida and the southern part of Texas have column water vapor amounts between approximately 2 and 3 cm. Figure 9b is a level 3 water vapor image over the same area but for July of 2001. The Rocky Mountain areas have column water vapor values less than about 2 cm in the summer month. Many states in central United States have high concentrations of water vapor originating from the Gulf of Mexico. The moisture even reaches Canada through North Dakota and Minnesota. The high concentrations of moisture over the western part of Mexico are due to water vapor originated from the Pacific Ocean. The patterns of water vapor distributions for the summer month are drastically different from those for the winter month.
4.4. Sample Level 3 Water Vapor Images Over Australia From Terra MODIS
 The level 3 monthly mean near-IR water vapor images can also be used to study annual variations of water vapor distributions. Figure 10 shows an example of such studies. In Figure 10a we show the level 3 water vapor image over Australia for January 2001. January is a summer month in the Southern Hemisphere. The northern part of Australia is in the tropical region. Column water vapor amounts over this region are typically in the 4–6 cm range. The southeastern parts of Australia typically have column water vapor amounts between 2 and 3 cm. Figure 10b shows the water vapor image over Australia for the same month but for the year of 2002, an El Nino year. By comparing Figure 10b with Figure 10a, it is seen that column water vapor amounts in the middle and southern portions of Australia for January of 2002 are significantly less than those for January of 2001. The decreases in water vapor amounts may be related to the eastward movement of the “warm pool” during the El Nino year. The waters north of Australia in the Pacific Ocean are colder in the El Nino year. Less evaporation would occur and less amounts of water vapor would be available for transporting to the Australia continent.
4.5. Sample Level 3 Global Water Vapor Images From Terra MODIS
Figure 11a is a global water vapor image for January of 2001. During this Northern Hemisphere winter month, the water vapor amounts over most parts of North America, Europe, Asia, and northern part of the Africa Continent are small (<2 cm). Only the southern parts of Indian Continent and Indo-China have relatively higher moisture contents with column water vapor amounts in the range of 3–4.5 cm. Brazil, the southern part of African Continent, and Australia have high moisture contents. Figure 11b is a global water vapor image for July of 2001. The Northern Hemisphere becomes moister in comparison with the January image. The Indian Continent, Indo-China, and eastern part of China are now saturated with water vapor. The central United States is also quite moist due to water vapor transported north from the Gulf of Mexico. The southern part of South America, southern part of the African Continent, and Australia are dry during their winter season. The high elevation areas, such as those of Rocky Mountains in North America, Andes Mountains in South America, Himalayas in Asia, and the Sahara desert areas in northern Africa have low moisture contents in both the July and January images. The water vapor images in Figures 11a and 11b show the utility of the level 3 monthly mean near-IR water vapor images for the studies of seasonal variations of water vapor on a global scale.
5. Validation, Error Analysis, and Discussion
 We have made extensive analysis of the level 2 and level 3 near-IR water vapor images in order to make sure that no gross mistakes are present in our products. During the first year of Terra MODIS' operation in 2000, we made comparisons between our water vapor values and those obtained from ground-based upward looking Sun photometer measurements [Dubovik et al., 2002]. The correlation between the two sets of water vapor values is excellent. However, because systematic differences were present between the two water vapor retrieval algorithms, the water vapor values derived from the Sun photometer measurements were not used for the absolute validation of our MODIS near-IR water vapor products.
 In order to gain confidence in the accuracy of our near-IR water vapor products, we have compared the MODIS near-IR water vapor values with those measured with a ground-based upward looking microwave radiometer located at a site in the Southern Great Plains in Oklahoma for a time period between November 2000 and December 2001. The microwave radiometer measurements were sponsored by the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program and the data were released for public use. Figure 12a shows a scatterplot between the water vapor values measured with the microwave radiometer and the MODIS near-IR water vapor values measured on clear days between November 2000 and December 2001. The data points for column water vapor amounts greater than 3.5 cm are not included in this plot. The regression analysis of the two data sets gives a slope of 0.97 and a very small offset (0.06 cm), suggesting good agreement between the two sets of data. Figure 12b shows a similar plot but including the data points having column water vapor amounts greater than 3.5 cm for the same time period. The regression analysis of the two data sets gives a slope of 0.93. The decrease in the slope is largely due to the fact that for the few points with water vapor values greater than 3.5 cm, the MODIS water vapor values are somewhat systematically larger than the microwave radiometer water vapor values. Overall, the water vapor values from MODIS and from microwave radiometer measurements, as shown in Figures 12a and 12b, agree quite well, with differences typically in the range between 5 and 10%.
 Several sources of errors for water vapor retrievals from near-IR channels were previously studied [e.g., Gao et al., 1990; Kaufman and Gao, 1992; Gao et al., 1993; Bouffies et al., 1997]. They include uncertainties in the spectral reflectance of the surface, sensor radiometric and spectral calibrations, pixel registration between several channels, atmospheric temperature and moisture profiles, and the amount of haze. Through analysis of actual MODIS data, we have found that the largest sources of errors are the uncertainty in spectral reflectances of surface targets and the uncertainty in the amount of haze for dark surfaces. As described previously, we have assumed in our near-IR water vapor algorithm that the reflectance spectra of surface targets vary linearly with wavelength over the 0.8–1.3 μm region (see Figures 2 and 3). The surface reflectances for the three water vapor absorption channels centered at 0.905, 0.936, and 0.94 μm are obtained from the reflectances of the two atmospheric window channels at 0.865 and 1.24 μm through linear interpolation. These predicted reflectances can deviate from the true reflectances of the surface targets. The amount of deviations depends on the surface targets. Under typical atmospheric conditions, the associated errors in column water retrievals for surfaces covered by green vegetation, dry vegetation, snow, mineral and soils (excluding iron-rich soils), and iron-rich soils are estimated [Gao et al., 1993] to be approximately 2.6%, 2.4%, 3.9%, 2.6%, and 8.4%, respectively.
 The effect of haze on remote sensing of water vapor depends on the amount of haze and the magnitude of the surface reflectances. Under typical atmospheric conditions with visibilities of 20 km or greater, the aerosol effects on water vapor retrievals are not significant for land surfaces with reflectance values of 0.2–0.4 in the 0.8–1.3 μm spectral region. This is due to the self-compensation between the aerosol absorption and scattering effects [Fraser and Kaufman, 1985]. However, under hazy conditions (with visibilities less than 10 km) or when the surface reflectances near 1 μm are small (less than about 0.1), errors can be 10% or slightly greater in our retrieved water vapor values using the atmospheric transmittance model if the aerosol effects are not corrected.
 Before the launch of Terra MODIS into space, we planned to correct for the aerosol effects in the level 2 near-IR water vapor product when the aerosol optical depths in the visible were 0.3 or greater. A module for aerosol corrections was developed and implemented in the near-IR water vapor algorithm. In this module, the level 2 aerosol optical depth image [Kaufman et al., 1997] and the water vapor image derived with the atmospheric transmittance model were read in. Scaling factors were derived using the aerosol optical depths and lookup table procedures. These scaling factors were then applied to the water vapor image to produce the final aerosol-effect-corrected water vapor image. Two precalculated lookup tables were used during the derivation of the scaling factors. The lookup tables were generated using DISORT, a radiative transfer code developed by Stamnes et al. . The k-distribution coefficients were used as inputs to DISORT in order to properly take care of water vapor absorption effects. Application of this aerosol correction module to real MODIS data did not yield improved estimates of water vapor values. As a result, we abandoned the efforts in correction of aerosol effects when retrieving water vapor values from the MODIS near-IR channels. Our level 2 near-IR water vapor product is now derived simply using atmospheric transmittance models.
 We have developed an operational algorithm for retrieving column water vapor amounts from several MODIS near-IR channels. The algorithm relies on observations of water vapor attenuation of near-IR solar radiation reflected by surfaces or clouds. The algorithm uses the ratios of water vapor absorbing channels located within the 0.94–μm water vapor band with the atmospheric window channels centered at 0.865 μm and 1.24 μm. The ratios largely remove the effects of the variation of surface reflectance with wavelength for most land surfaces and result in the atmospheric transmittances. The column water vapor amounts are derived from the transmittances using a table searching procedure. The lookup tables were generated with a line-by-line code and the HITRAN2000 line database. Typical errors in the derived water vapor values are estimated to be in the range between 5% and 10%. The daily level 2 “pixel-based” near-IR water vapor product, and the daily, 8-day, and monthly level 3 near-IR water vapor products at a 1° by 1° latitude-longitude grid globally are now routinely produced and archived at a NASA computing facility. These level 3 data products are useful for the study of seasonal and annual variations of water vapor on regional and global scales.
 The authors would like to thank many scientists and software engineers for their help and support during various stages of code development and integration. They include, but are not limited to, R. Hucek, V. Lin, R. R. Li, D. A. Chu, S. Mattoo, L. Remer, C. Ichoku, W. Han, P. Yang, S. H. Shen, M. A. Gray, E. G. Moody, P. A. Hubanks, Y. Han, P. Li, L. S. Rothman, A. Heidinger, and W. R. Ridgway at different organizations. This research is supported by the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and by the Office of Naval Research.