SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bencala, K. E., A perspective on stream-catchment connections, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 12(1), 4447, 1993.
  • Bierkens, M. F. P., and H. J. T. Weerts, Block hydraulic conductivity of cross-bedded fluvial sediments, Water Resour. Res., 30(10), 26652678, 1994.
  • Bouwer, H., and R. C. Rice, A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells, Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 423428, 1976.
  • Bridge, J. S., Flow, bed topography, grain size and sedimentary structure in open channel bends: A three-dimensional model, Earth Surf. Processes, 2, 401416, 1977.
  • Bridge, J. S., A revised model for water flow, sediment transport, bed topography, and grain size sorting in natural river bends, Water Resour. Res., 28(4), 9991013, 1992.
  • Butler, J. J. Jr., The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests, 252 pp., A. F. Lewis, New York, 1998.
  • Butler, J. J.Jr., V. A. Zlotnik, and M.-S. Tsou, Drawdown and stream depletion produced by pumping in the vicinity of a partially penetrating stream, Ground Water, 39(5), 651659, 2001.
  • Burger, R. L., and K. Belitz, Measurement of anisotropic hydraulic conductivity in unconsolidated sands: A case study from a shoreface deposit, Oyster, Virginia, Water Resour. Res., 3(6), 15151522, 1997.
  • Calver, A., Riverbed permeabilities: Information from pooled data, Ground Water, 39(4), 546553, 2001.
  • Davis, J. L., and A. P. Annan, Ground penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy, Geophys. Prospect., 37, 531551, 1989.
  • Davis, J. M., J. L. Wilson, F. M. Phillips, and M. B. Gotkowitz, Relationship between fluvial bounding surfaces and the permeability correlation structure, Water Resour. Res., 33(8), 18431854, 1997.
  • Dowdy, S., and S. Wearden, Statistics for Research, 629 pp., John Wiley, New York, 1991.
  • Duwelius, R. F., Hydraulic conductivity of the streambed, east branch Grand Calumet River, northern Lake County, Indiana, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 96-4218, 37 pp., 1996.
  • Gelhar, L. W., Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology, 390 pp., Prentice-Hall, Old Tappan, N. J., 1993.
  • Gelhar, L. W., C. Welty, and K. R. Rehfeldt, A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 28(7), 19551974, 1992.
  • Harvey, J. W., B. J. Wagner, and K. E. Bencala, Evaluating the reliability of the stream tracer approach to characterize stream-subsurface water exchange, Water Resour. Res., 32(8), 24412451, 1996.
  • Hinsby, K., P. L. Bjerg, L. J. Andersen, B. Skov, and E. V. Clausen, A mini slug test method for determination of a local hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined sandy aquifer, J. Hydrol., 136, 87106, 1992.
  • Hunt, B., J. Weir, and B. Clente, A stream depletion field experiment, Ground Water, 39(2), 283289, 2001.
  • Kollet, S. J., and V. A. Zlotnik, Stream depletion predictions using pumping test data from a heterogeneous stream-aquifer system (A case study from the great plains, USA), J. Hydrology, in press, 2003.
  • Koltermann, C. E., and S. M. Gorelick, Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: A review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches, Water Resour. Res., 32(9), 26172658, 1996.
  • Landon, M. K., D. L. Rus, and F. E. Harvey, Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds, Ground Water, 39(6), 870885, 2001.
  • McDonald, M. G., and A. W. Harbaugh, A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep., 83, 875 pp., 1984.
  • Meyers, R. A., and D. G. Smith, Submersible ground penetrating radar a new geophysical tool to assess channel-fills, scours and sub-fill bedrock topography, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs, 29(6), 448, 1997.
  • Olimpio, J. R., Use of a ground-penetrating radar system to detect pre- and post-flood scour at selected bridge sites in New Hampshire, 1996–98, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 00-4035, 28 pp., 2000.
  • Palmer, M. A., Experimentation in the hyporheic zone: Challenges and prospectus, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 12(1), 8493, 1993.
  • Parker, G., and E. D. Andrews, Sorting of bed load sediment by flow in meander bends, Water Resour. Res., 21(9), 13611373, 1985.
  • Placzek, G., and F. P. Haeni, Surface-geophysical techniques used to detect existing and infilled scour holes near bridge piers, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 95-4009, 44 pp., 1995.
  • Rus, D. L., V. L. McGuire, B. R. Zurbuchen, and V. A. Zlotnik, Vertical profiles of streambed hydraulic conductivity determined using slug tests in central and western Nebraska, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 01-4212, 32 pp., 2001.
  • Scheibe, T. D., and D. L. Freyberg, The use of sedimentological information for geometric simulation of natural porous media structure, Water Resour. Res., 31(12), 32593270, 1995.
  • Sensors and Software, Inc., Win_EKKO user's guide version 1.0, Tech. Manual 30, 68 pp., Ontario, Canada, 2001.
  • Sniegocki, R. T., Ground-water resources of the Prairie Creek unit of the lower Platte River basin, Nebraska, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Pap. 1327, 133 pp., 1955.
  • Sophocleous, M. A., A. D. Koussis, J. L. Martin, and S. P. Perkins, Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration, Ground Water, 33(4), 579588, 1995.
  • Sprent, P., Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd ed., 342 pp., Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993.
  • Springer, A. E., W. D. Petroutson, and B. A. Semmens, Spatial and temporal variability of hydraulic conductivity in active reattachment bars of the Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Ground Water, 37(3), 338344, 1999.
  • Sun, T., P. Meakin, and T. Jøssang, A computer model for meandering rivers with multiple bed load sediment sizes: 2. Computer simulations, Water Resour. Res., 37(8), 22432258, 2001.
  • Vukovic, M., and A. Soro, Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity of Porous Media From Grain-Size Composition, 83 pp., Water Resour. Publ., Highlands Ranch, Colo., 1992.
  • Warren, J. E., and H. S. Price, Flow in heterogeneous porous media, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 1, 153169, 1961.
  • Webb, E. K., and M. P. Anderson, Simulation of preferential flow in three-dimensional, heterogeneous conductivity fields with realistic internal architecture, Water Resour. Res., 32(3), 533545, 1996.
  • Webb, E. K., and J. M. Davis, Simulation of the spatial heterogeneity of geologic properties: An overview, in Hydrogeologic Models of Sedimentary Aquifers, edited by G. S. Fraser, and J. M. Davis, pp. 124, Soc. for Sediment. Geol., Tulsa, Okla., 1998.
  • Woessner, W. W., Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought, Ground Water, 38(3), 423429, 2000.
  • Zlotnik, V., Interpretation of slug and packer tests in anisotropic aquifers, Ground Water, 32(5), 761766, 1994.
  • Zlotnik, V. A., and H. Huang, Effect of partial penetration and streambed sediments on aquifer response to stream stage fluctuations, Ground Water, 37(4), 599605, 1999.
  • Zlotnik, V. A., and V. L. McGuire, Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations: 2. Hydraulic conductivity identification, method verification, and field applications, J. Hydrol., 204, 283296, 1998.
  • Zlotnik, V., H. Huang, and J. J. Butler Jr., Evaluation of stream depletion considering finite stream width, shallow penetration, and properties of streambed sediments, in Proceedings of Joint Congress, Water 99, Brisbane, Australia, July 6-8, pp. 221226, Inst. of Eng. Aust., Brisbane, 1999.
  • Zlotnik, V. A., B. R. Zurbuchen, and T. Ptak, The steady-state dipole-flow test for characterization of hydraulic conductivity statistics in a highly permeable aquifer; Horkheimer Insel site, Germany, Ground Water, 39(4), 504516, 2001.
  • Zurbuchen, B. R., V. A. Zlotnik, and J. J. Butler Jr., Dynamic interpretation of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 38(3), 1025, doi:10.1029/2001WR000354, 2002.