SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American Rivers, Friends of the Earth, and Trout Unlimited, Dam Removal Success Stories, Washington, D. C., 1999.
  • American Society of Civil Engineers Task Committee, Guidelines for Retirement of Dams and Hydroelectric Facilities, New York, 1997.
  • Buffington, J. M., and D. R. Montgomery, A systematic analysis of eight decades of incipient motion studies, with special reference to gravel-bedded rivers, Water Resour. Res., 33, 19932029, 1997.
  • Chow, V. T., Open Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.
  • Doyle, M. W., River response to disturbance: Geomorphology and nutrient dynamics following dam removal and urbanization, Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Indiana, 2002.
  • Doyle, M. W., E. H. Stanley, and J. M. Harbor, Geomorphic analogies for assessing probable channel response to dam removal, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., in press, 2002.
  • Edwards, T. K., and G. D. Glysson, Field methods for measurement of fluvial sediment, in Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, 89 pp., U.S. Geol. Surv., Reston, Va., 1999.
  • Egan, J., and J. E. Pizzuto, Geomorphic effects of the removal of the Manatawny Dam, Pottstown, PA, Eos Trans. AGU, 81(48), F515, Fall Meet. Suppl., 2000.
  • Evans, J. E., S. D. Mackey, J. F. Gottgens, and W. M. Gill, Lessons from a dam failure, Ohio J. Sci., 5, 121131, 2000.
  • Ferguson, R. T., and C. Paola, Bias and precision of percentiles of bulk grain size distributions, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 22, 10611077, 1997.
  • Gilbert, G. K., Hydraulic-mining debris in the Sierra Nevada, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 105, 154 pp., 1917.
  • Grant, G., Dam removal: Panacea or Pandora for rivers? Hydrol. Processes, 14, 15311532, 2001.
  • Harbor, J. M., Proposed measures to alleviate the environmental impacts of hydroelectric dams on the Elwha River, Washington, U.S.A, in Industrial and Agricultural Impacts on the Hydrologic Environment: Proceedings of the Second USA/CIS Joint Conference on Environmental Hydrology and Hydrogeology, edited by Y. Eckstein, and A. Zaporozec, pp. 199214, Am. Inst. of Hydrol., St. Paul, Minn., 1993.
  • Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, Dam Removal: Science and Decision Making, Washington, D. C., 2002.
  • Howard, A. D., Equilibrium and time scales in geomorphology—Application to sand-bed alluvial streams, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 7, 303325, 1982.
  • Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC-RAS River Analysis System, User's Manual, U.S. Army Corps of Eng., Davis, Calif., 1995.
  • Kareiva, P., M. Marvier, and M. McClure, Recovery and management options for spring/summer Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin, Science, 290, 977979, 2000.
  • Langendoen, E. J., CONCEPTS—Conservational channel evolution and pollutant transport system, Res. Rep. 16, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Oxford, Miss., 2000.
  • Leopold, L. B., Sediment size that determines channel morphology, in Dynamics of Gravel-Bed Rivers, edited by P. Billi et al., pp. 297311, John Wiley, New York, 1992.
  • Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller, Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1964.
  • Lisle, T. E., Y. T. Cui, G. Parker, J. E. Pizzuto, and A. M. Dodd, The dominance of dispersion in the evolution of bed material waves in gravel-bed rivers, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 26, 14091420, 2001.
  • Madej, M. A., and V. Ozaki, Channel response to sediment wave propagation and movement, Redwood Creek, California, USA, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 21, 911927, 1996.
  • Miles, R. L., The hydrologist and dam removal: A legal perspective, Eos Trans. AGU, 59(12), 1069, 1978.
  • Pizzuto, J. E., Effects of dam removal on river form and process, BioScience, 52, 683692, 2002.
  • Rathburn, S. L., and E. E. Wohl, One-dimensional sediment transport modeling of pool recovery along a mountain channel after a reservoir sediment release, Reg. Rivers Res. Manage., 17, 251273, 2001.
  • Ritter, D. F., R. C. Kochel, and J. R. Miller, The disruption of Grassy Creek: Implications concerning catastrophic events and thresholds, Geomorphology, 29, 323338, 1999.
  • Schumm, S. A., M. D. Harvey, and C. C. Watson, Incised Channels: Morphology, Dynamics, and Control, Water Resour. Publ., Highlands Ranch, Colo., 1984.
  • Shields, F. D., A. Brookes, and J. Haltiner, Geomorphological approaches to incised stream channel restoration in the United States and Europe, in Incised River Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering, and Management, edited by S. E. Darby, and A. Simon, pp. 371394, John Wiley, New York, 1999.
  • Shuman, J. R., Environmental considerations for assessing dam removal alternatives for river restoration, Reg. Rivers Res. Manage., 11, 249261, 1995.
  • Simon, A., A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 14, 1126, 1989.
  • Simon, A., Energy, time, and channel evolution in catastrophically disturbed fluvial systems, Geomorphology, 5, 345372, 1992.
  • Simon, A., and S. E. Darby, Process-form interactions in unstable sand-bed river channels: A numerical modeling approach, Geomorphology, 21, 85106, 1997.
  • Simon, A., and C. R. Hupp, Geomorphic and vegetative recovery processes along modified stream channels of west Tennessee, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. , 91-502, 199214, 1992.
  • Simon, A., A. Curini, S. Darby, and E. J. Langendoen, Streambank mechanics and the role of bank and near-bank processes in incised channels, in Incised River Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering, and Management, edited by S. E. Darby, and A. Simon, pp. 123152, John Wiley, New York, 1999.
  • Simons, R. K., and D. B. Simons, Sediment problems associated with dam removal—Muskegon River, Michigan, in Hydraulic Engineering: Proceedings of the National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering, edited by R. Shane, pp. 680685, Am. Soc. of Civ. Eng., New York, 1991.
  • Stanley, E. H., and M. W. Doyle, A geomorphic perspective on nutrient retention following dam removal, BioScience, 52, 693701, 2002.
  • Stanley, E. H., M. A. Luebke, M. W. Doyle, and D. W. Marshall, Short-term changes in channel form and macroinvertebrate communities following low-head dam removal, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 21, 172187, 2002.
  • Stofleth, J. M., M. W. Doyle, E. H. Stanley, and J. M. Harbor, Predicting channel morphology following dam removal using historic channel conditions, paper presented at the American Society of Civil Engineers Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference, Reno, Nev., 2001.
  • Thorne, C. R., Bank processes and channel evolution in the incised rivers of north-central Mississippi, in Incised River Channels: Processes, Forms, Engineering, and Management, edited by S. E. Darby, and A. Simon, pp. 97121, John Wiley, New York, 1999.
  • Trimble, S. W., A sediment budget for Coon Creek Basin in the driftless area, Wisconsin, 1853–1977, Am. J. Sci., 283, 454474, 1983.
  • Wik, S. J., Reservoir drawdown: Case study in flow changes to potentially improve fisheries, J. Energy Eng., 121, 8996, 1995.
  • Williams, D. T., Effects of dam removal: An approach to sedimentation, Tech. Pap. 50, Hydrol. Eng. Cent., U.S. Army Corps of Eng., Davis, Calif., 1977.
  • Wohl, E. E., and D. A. Cenderelli, Sediment deposition and transport patterns following a reservoir sediment release, Water Resour. Res., 36, 319333, 2000.
  • Wolman, M. G., A method of sampling coarse river-bed material, Eos Trans. AGU, 35(6), 951956, 1954.