• Childers, D., U. S. Geol. Surv. Water-Resources Investigations, Report 994215,2000.
  • Doyle, M. W., E. H. Stanley, and J. M. Harbor, Channel adjustments following two dam removals in Wisconsin, Water Res. Res., 391101110.1029/2002WR001714, 2003.
  • , Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Dam Safety Program, htm, 1999.
  • , Heinz Center, Dam Removal: Science and Decision Making.The Heinz Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment, Washington, D. C., 2002.
  • Kanehl, P. D., J. Lyons, and J. E. Nelson, Changes in the habitat and fish community of the Milwaukee River, Wisconsin, following removal of the Woolen Mills Dam, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17, 387400, 1997.
  • Kareiva, P., M. Marvier, and M. McClure, Recovery and management options for spring/summer Chinook Salmon in the Columbia River Basin, Science, 290, 977979, 2000.
  • Miles, R. L., The hydrologist and dam removal - a legal perspective, Eos Trans., AGU, 59, 1069, 1978.
  • , National Research Council, The Missouri River Ecosystem: Exploring the Prospects for Recovery, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 2002.
  • Pizzuto, J., Effects of dam removal on river form and process, BioScience, 52, 683692, 2002.
  • Shuman, J. R, Environmental considerations for assessing dam removal alternatives for river restoration, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 11, 249261, 1995.
  • Stanley, E. H., and M. W. Doyle, A geomorphic perspective on nutrient retention following dam removal, BioScience, 52, 693702, 2002.
  • Stanley, E. H., M. A. Luebke, M. W. Doyle, and D. W. Marshall, Short-term changes in channel form and macroinvertebrate communities following low-head dam removal, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 21, 172187, 2002.
  • Wik, S. J., Reservoir drawdown: Case study in flow changes to potentially improve fisheries, Journal of Energy Engineering, 121, 8996, 1995.
  • , World Commission on Dams, Dams and Development, 404, Earthscan Publications, London, 2000.