SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barrie, L. A., et al., A comparison of large-scale atmospheric sulfate aerosol models (COSAM): Overview and highlights, Tellus, Ser. B, 53, 615645, 2001.
  • Barth, M. C., P. J. Rasch, J. T. Kiehl, C. M. Benkovitz, and S. E. Schwartz, Sulfur chemistry in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: Description, evaluation, features, and sensitivity to aqueous chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 13871415, 2000.
  • Bear, L. K., and G. L. Pavlis, Multi-channel estimation of time residuals from broadband seismic data using multi-wavelets, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 89, 681692, 1999.
  • Chin, M., R. B. Rood, S.-J. Lin, J.-F. Muller, and A. Thompson, Atmospheric sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: Model description and global properties, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24,67124,687, 2000.
  • Koch, D., D. Jacob, I. Tegen, D. Rind, and M. Chin, Tropospheric sulfur simulation and sulfate direct radiative forcing in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 23,79923,822, 1999.
  • Lanzante, J., The leading modes of 10–30 day variability in the extratropics of the Northern Hemisphere during the cold season, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 21152140, 1990.
  • Lilly, J., and J. Park, Multiwavelet spectral and polarization analysis of seismic records, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 10011021, 1995.
  • Lohmann, U., and G. Lesins, Stronger constraints on the anthropogenic indirect aerosol effect, Science, 298, 10121015, 2002.
  • McNaughton, D. J., and R. J. Vet, Eulerian model evaluation field study (EMEFS): A summary of surface network measurments and data quality, Atmos. Environ., 30, 227238, 1996.
  • Menon, S., A. D. Del Genio, D. Koch, and G. Tselioudis, GCM simulations of the aerosol indirect effect: Sensitivity to cloud parameterization and aerosol burden, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 692713, 2002.
  • Park, J., and M. E. Mann, Interannual temperature events and shifts in global temperature: A multiwavelet correlation approach, Earth Interact., 4, online paper 4-0001, 2000.
  • Park, J., F. L. Vernon III, and C. R. Lindberg, Frequency-dependent polarization analysis of high-frequency seismograms, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 12,66412,674, 1987a.
  • Park, J., C. R. Lindberg, and F. L. Vernon III, Multitaper spectral analysis of high frequency seismograms, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 12,67512,684, 1987b.
  • Penner, J. E.et al., Aerosols: Their direct and indirect effects, in Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, edited by J. T. Houghton et al., pp. 289348, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001.
  • Percival, D. B., and A. T. Walden, Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1993.
  • Rossow, W. B., and R. A. Schiffer, Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 22612288, 1999.
  • Schaug, J., J. E. Hansen, K. Nodop, B. Ottar, and J. M. Pacyna, Summary report from the chemical co-ordinating center for the third phase of EMEP, EMEP/CC Rep. 3/87, 160 pp., Norw. Inst. for Air Res., Lillestrom, 1987.
  • Schubert, S. D., A statistical-dynamical study of empirically determined modes of atmospheric variability, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 317, 1985.
  • Schwartz, S. E., Harshvardhan, and C. M. Benkovitz, Influence of anthropogenic aerosol on cloud optical depth and albedo shown by satellite measurements and chemical transport modeling, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 99, 17841789, 2002.
  • Stubenrauch, C. J., W. B. Rossow, F. Cheruy, A. Chdin, and N. A., Clouds as seen by satellite sounders (3I) and imagers (ISCCP). Part I. Evaluation of cloud parameters, J. Clim., 12, 21892213, 1999.
  • Thomson, D. J., Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis, IEEE Proc., 70, 10551096, 1982.
  • Usher, C. R., H. Al-Hosney, S. Carlos-Cuellar, and V. H. Grassian, A laboratory study of the heterogeneous uptake and oxidation of sulfur dioxide on mineral dust particles, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D23), 4713, doi:10.1029/2002JD002051, 2002.