EPA hearing sparks controversy
Article first published online: 3 JUN 2011
©2006. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
Volume 87, Issue 13, page 130, 28 March 2006
How to Cite
2006), EPA hearing sparks controversy, Eos Trans. AGU, 87(13), 130–130, doi:10.1029/2006EO130003.(
- Issue published online: 3 JUN 2011
- Article first published online: 3 JUN 2011
- Cited By
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is not investing enough money in the science needed for the agency to make sound environmental policy decisions, according to several witnesses who testified before a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee on 16 March.
The House Science Subcommittee on Environment.Technology, and Standards brought together George Gray, EPA associate administrator for research and development, and three other witnesses to discuss the proposed cuts to EPA's Office of Research and Development (ORD).the agency's primary research arm. The Bush Administration has proposed cutting the ORD budget by six percent in Fiscal Year 2007, to $557 million. This would continue a trend of decreases for ORD, whose budget would decline by 14 percent from FY2004 to FY2007 if the cuts are approved by the U.S. Congress.