Uncertainties of modeling gross primary productivity over Europe: A systematic study on the effects of using different drivers and terrestrial biosphere models
Article first published online: 27 DEC 2007
Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume 21, Issue 4, December 2007
How to Cite
2007), Uncertainties of modeling gross primary productivity over Europe: A systematic study on the effects of using different drivers and terrestrial biosphere models, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 21, GB4021, doi:10.1029/2006GB002915., et al. (
- Issue published online: 27 DEC 2007
- Article first published online: 27 DEC 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 11 SEP 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 9 JUL 2007
- Manuscript Received: 15 DEC 2006
Auxiliary material for this article contains six additional figures to support the manuscript.
Auxiliary material files may require downloading to a local drive depending on platform, browser, configuration, and size. To open auxiliary materials in a browser, click on the label. To download, Right-click and select “Save Target As…” (PC) or CTRL-click and select “Download Link to Disk” (Mac).
See Plugins for a list of applications and supported file formats.
Additional file information is provided in the readme.txt.
|gbc1431-sup-0001-readme.txt||plain text document||3K||readme.txt|
|gbc1431-sup-0002-ps01.tif||TIFF image||178K||Figure S1. The fraction of interannual variance that is not explained by the correlation R2 between LPJ and Orchidee for each pixel.|
|gbc1431-sup-0003-ps02.tif||TIFF image||2338K||Figure S2. Difference of mean annual (1981–2000) meteorological variables of ECMWF and REMO (ECMWF-REMO).|
|gbc1431-sup-0004-ps03.tif||TIFF image||278K||Figure S3. The fraction of variance that is not explained by the correlation R2 (1-R2) between meteorological forcing fields between ECMWF and REMO for each pixel.|
|gbc1431-sup-0005-ps04.tif||TIFF image||375K||Figure S4. Fractions of the most important vegetation types used as input and mean maximum LAI and annual GPP (1981–2000) as simulated by Biome-BGC, LPJ, and Orchidee.|
|gbc1431-sup-0006-fs05.tif||TIFF image||74K||Figure S5. Comparison of the variation of APAR for different models and an independent estimate calculated from the SeaWiFS FAPAR product.|
|gbc1431-sup-0007-ps06.tif||TIFF image||250K||Figure S6. Maps of Pearson's correlation coefficient between GPP and APAR and RUE (1981–2000).|
|gbc1431-sup-0008-t01.txt||plain text document||1K||Tab-delimited Table 1.|
|gbc1431-sup-0009-t02.txt||plain text document||1K||Tab-delimited Table 2.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.