Composition and Chemistry
Retrieval of average CO2 fluxes by combining in situ CO2 measurements and backscatter lidar information
Article first published online: 16 MAY 2007
Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012)
Volume 112, Issue D10, 27 May 2007
How to Cite
2007), Retrieval of average CO2 fluxes by combining in situ CO2 measurements and backscatter lidar information, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10301, doi:10.1029/2006JD008190., , , , , , , and (
- Issue published online: 16 MAY 2007
- Article first published online: 16 MAY 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 FEB 2007
- Manuscript Received: 27 OCT 2006
- Carbon dioxide;
- flux retrieval;
 The present paper deals with a boundary layer budgeting method which makes use of observations from various in situ and remote sensing instruments to infer regional average net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2. Measurements of CO2 within and above the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) by in situ sensors, in conjunction with a precise knowledge of the change in ABL height by lidar and radiosoundings, enable to infer diurnal and seasonal NEE variations. Near-ground in situ CO measurements are used to discriminate natural and anthropogenic contributions of CO2 diurnal variations in the ABL. The method yields mean NEE that amounts to 5 μmol m−2 s−1 during the night and −20 μmol m−2 s−1 in the middle of the day between May and July. A good agreement is found with the expected NEE accounting for a mixed wheat field and forest area during winter season, representative of the mesoscale ecosystems in the Paris area according to the trajectory of an air column crossing the landscape. Daytime NEE is seen to follow the vegetation growth and the change in the ratio diffuse/direct radiation. The CO2 vertical mixing flux during the rise of the atmospheric boundary layer is also estimated and seems to be the main cause of the large decrease of CO2 mixing ratio in the morning. The outcomes on CO2 flux estimate are compared to eddy-covariance measurements on a barley field. The importance of various sources of error and uncertainty on the retrieval is discussed. These errors are estimated to be less than 15%; the main error resulted from anthropogenic emissions.