Repeating earthquake finite source models: Strong asperities revealed on the San Andreas Fault
Article first published online: 5 DEC 2007
Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.
Geophysical Research Letters
Volume 34, Issue 23, December 2007
How to Cite
2007), Repeating earthquake finite source models: Strong asperities revealed on the San Andreas Fault, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L23302, doi:10.1029/2007GL031353., , and (
- Issue published online: 5 DEC 2007
- Article first published online: 5 DEC 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 18 OCT 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 10 OCT 2007
- Manuscript Received: 24 JUL 2007
Auxiliary material for this article contains additional information concerning the inversion of seismic moment rate functions for the other four events in the sequence of five repeating earthquakes as well as additional information on the resolution of fault slip and stress drop is provided.
Auxiliary material files may require downloading to a local drive depending on platform, browser, configuration, and size. To open auxiliary materials in a browser, click on the label. To download, Right-click and select “Save Target As…” (PC) or CTRL-click and select “Download Link to Disk” (Mac).
See Plugins for a list of applications and supported file formats.
Additional file information is provided in the readme.txt.
|grl23718-sup-0001-readme.txt||plain text document||6K||readme.txt|
|grl23718-sup-0002-fs01.jpg||image/pjpeg||678K||Figure S1. Example of vertical component waveforms recorded at stations JCNB for the five studied events.|
|grl23718-sup-0003-fs02.jpg||image/pjpeg||437K||Figure S2. Comparison of moment rate functions obtained at station VCAB for the 2006 Event.|
|grl23718-sup-0004-fs03.jpg||image/pjpeg||296K||Figure S3. Stacked moment rate functions obtained for nine HRSN stations for the 2005 Repeater.|
|grl23718-sup-0005-fs04.jpg||image/pjpeg||944K||Figure S4. Rupture velocity is plotted against rise time.|
|grl23718-sup-0006-fs05.jpg||image/pjpeg||1503K||Figure S5. Comparison of slip models obtained for the five SAFOD repeating events.|
|grl23718-sup-0007-fs06.jpg||image/pjpeg||1323K||Figure S6. Comparison of stress drop models using the slip models shown in Figure S5.|
|grl23718-sup-0008-fs07.jpg||image/pjpeg||1008K||Figure S7. The observed and synthetic moment rate functions for the complete slip model are compared with a 1 asperity model and a 2 asperity model.|
|grl23718-sup-0009-fs08.jpg||image/pjpeg||1008K||Figure S8. Slip obtained in a series of tests in which EVT4 was inverted assuming different subfault dimensions.|
|grl23718-sup-0010-fs09.jpg||image/pjpeg||869K||Figure S9. Stress models derived from the EVT4 slip models.|
|grl23718-sup-0011-t01.txt||plain text document||1K||Tab-delimited Table 1.|
|grl23718-sup-0012-t02.txt||plain text document||1K||Tab-delimited Table 2.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.