Auxiliary material for this article contains details on methodology and the discussions, eleven figures, and one table.

Auxiliary material files may require downloading to a local drive depending on platform, browser, configuration, and size. To open auxiliary materials in a browser, click on the label. To download, Right-click and select “Save Target As…” (PC) or CTRL-click and select “Download Link to Disk” (Mac).

See Plugins for a list of applications and supported file formats.

Additional file information is provided in the readme.txt.

grl25334-sup-0001-readme.txtplain text document7Kreadme.txt
grl25334-sup-0002-txts01.texapplication/x-tex999Text S1. Details of methodology and discussions.
grl25334-sup-0003-txts01.pdfPDF document3168KText S1. Details of methodology and discussions.
grl25334-sup-0004-ts01.txtplain text document1KTable S1. Comparison of gravity anomalies of geopotential models.
grl25334-sup-0005-fs01.tifTIFF image53KFigure S1. Process for Moho fold estimation.
grl25334-sup-0006-fs02.tifTIFF image43KFigure S2. Modified models of Turcotte and Schubert [2002] for calculating wavelength of Moho fold.
grl25334-sup-0007-fs03.tifTIFF image46KFigure S3. Predicted wavelength of Moho fold.
grl25334-sup-0008-fs04.jpgimage/pjpeg184KFigure S4. Difference of Moho undulation models between this study and the latest model.
grl25334-sup-0009-fs05.jpgimage/pjpeg204KFigure S5. Profiles along West and East Lines shown in Figure 1.
grl25334-sup-0010-fs06.jpgimage/pjpeg144KFigure S6. Examination to find least RMS difference between Airy-type isostatic Moho and gravimentric inversion Moho models.
grl25334-sup-0011-fs07.jpgimage/pjpeg193KFigure S7. A preliminary Moho fold model based on the difference between the gravimetric inversion Moho and Airy-type isostatic Moho.
grl25334-sup-0012-fs08.jpgimage/pjpeg91KFigure S8. Cross-sectional view along CC′.
grl25334-sup-0013-fs09.jpgimage/pjpeg213KFigure S9. Estimated gravity errors of global geopotential models.
grl25334-sup-0014-fs10.jpgimage/pjpeg348KFigure S10. Comparison of gravity anomalies of geopotential models with respect to EGM2008.
grl25334-sup-0015-fs11.jpgimage/pjpeg403KFigure S11. Comparison of gravity anomalies of geopotential models with respect to ITG-Grace03s.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.