Tree ring evidence for limited direct CO2 fertilization of forests over the 20th century
Article first published online: 30 SEP 2010
Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume 24, Issue 3, September 2010
How to Cite
2010), Tree ring evidence for limited direct CO2 fertilization of forests over the 20th century, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 24, GB3027, doi:10.1029/2009GB003699., and (
- Issue published online: 30 SEP 2010
- Article first published online: 30 SEP 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 1 JUN 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 6 MAY 2010
- Manuscript Received: 19 OCT 2009
- global change;
- CO2 fertilization
 The effect that rising atmospheric CO2 levels will have on forest productivity and water use efficiency remains uncertain, yet it has critical implications for future rates of carbon sequestration and forest distributions. Efforts to understand the effect that rising CO2 will have on forests are largely based on growth chamber studies of seedlings, and the relatively small number of FACE sites. Inferences from these studies are limited by their generally short durations, artificial growing conditions, unnatural step-increases in CO2 concentrations, and poor replication. Here we analyze the global record of annual radial tree growth, derived from the International Tree ring Data Bank (ITRDB), for evidence of increasing growth rates that cannot be explained by climatic change alone, and for evidence of decreasing sensitivity to drought. We find that approximately 20 percent of sites globally exhibit increasing trends in growth that cannot be attributed to climatic causes, nitrogen deposition, elevation, or latitude, which we attribute to a direct CO2 fertilization effect. No differences were found between species in their likelihood to exhibit growth increases attributable to CO2 fertilization, although Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), the two most commonly sampled species in the ITRDB, exhibit a CO2 fertilization signal at frequencies very near their upper and lower confidence limits respectively. Overall these results suggest that CO2 fertilization of forests will not counteract emissions or slow warming in any substantial fashion, but do suggest that future forest dynamics may differ from those seen today depending on site conditions and individual species' responses to elevated CO2.