Enhancement of phytoplankton primary productivity in the southern East China Sea following episodic typhoon passage
Version of Record online: 4 JUN 2009
Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union.
Geophysical Research Letters
Volume 36, Issue 11, June 2009
How to Cite
2009), Enhancement of phytoplankton primary productivity in the southern East China Sea following episodic typhoon passage, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L11603, doi:10.1029/2009GL037883., , and (
- Issue online: 4 JUN 2009
- Version of Record online: 4 JUN 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 24 APR 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 15 APR 2009
- Manuscript Received: 22 FEB 2009
Auxiliary material for this article contains text that provides further information regarding the methods and results of our study and eleven figures.
Auxiliary material files may require downloading to a local drive depending on platform, browser, configuration, and size. To open auxiliary materials in a browser, click on the label. To download, Right-click and select “Save Target As…” (PC) or CTRL-click and select “Download Link to Disk” (Mac).
See Plugins for a list of applications and supported file formats.
Additional file information is provided in the readme.txt.
|grl25875-sup-0001-readme.txt||plain text document||4K||readme.txt|
|grl25875-sup-0002-txts01.txt||plain text document||9K||Text S1. Details of the methods and results of the study.|
|grl25875-sup-0003-fs01.tif||TIFF image||17K||Figure S1. Comparison of SeaWiFS and MODIS Chl-a extracted from daily images after Hai-Tang passage.|
|grl25875-sup-0004-fs02.tif||TIFF image||18K||Figure S2. Comparison of MODIS nLw551 and SeaWiFS nLw555 extracted from daily images after Hai-Tang passage.|
|grl25875-sup-0005-fs03.tif||TIFF image||25K||Figure S3. Map of the ECS showing the polygon over which ECS summer-fall NP was computed.|
|grl25875-sup-0006-fs04.tif||TIFF image||17019K||Figure S4. Images of merged Chl-a, MODIS SST, merged nLw555, estimated PP, and HF radar-derived surface currents in the southern ECS for before and after Typhoons Vamco and Maemi.|
|grl25875-sup-0007-fs05.tif||TIFF image||14842K||Figure S5. Same as Figure S4, but for Typhoons Rananim and Aere.|
|grl25875-sup-0008-fs06.tif||TIFF image||15100K||Figure S6. Same as Figure S4, but for Typhoons Haima and Nock-Ten.|
|grl25875-sup-0009-fs07.tif||TIFF image||16854K||Figure S7. Same as Figure S4, but for Typhoons Hai-Tang and Matsa.|
|grl25875-sup-0010-fs08.tif||TIFF image||16483K||Figure S8. Same as Figure S4, but for Typhoons Talim and Khanun.|
|grl25875-sup-0011-fs09.tif||TIFF image||16667K||Figure S9. Same as Figure S4, but for Typhoons Longwang and Bilis.|
|grl25875-sup-0012-fs10.tif||TIFF image||15198K||Figure S10. Same as Figure S4, but for Typhoons Kaemi and Saomai.|
|grl25875-sup-0013-fs11.tif||TIFF image||14655K||Figure S11. Same as Figure S4, but for Typhoons Sepat and Wipha.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.