Meander dynamics: A nonlinear model without curvature restrictions for flow in open-channel bends
Article first published online: 20 OCT 2010
Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface (2003–2012)
Volume 115, Issue F4, December 2010
How to Cite
2010), Meander dynamics: A nonlinear model without curvature restrictions for flow in open-channel bends, J. Geophys. Res., 115, F04011, doi:10.1029/2009JF001301., and (
- Issue published online: 20 OCT 2010
- Article first published online: 20 OCT 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 29 APR 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 5 NOV 2009
- Manuscript Received: 5 MAR 2009
- secondary flow
 Despite the rapid evolution of computational power, simulation of meander dynamics by means of reduced and computationally less expensive models remains practically relevant for investigation of large-scale and long-term processes, probabilistic predictions, or rapid assessments. Existing meander models are invariantly based on the assumptions of mild curvature and slow curvature variations and fail to explain processes in the high-curvature range. This article proposes a nonlinear model for meander hydrodynamics without curvature restrictions. It provides the distribution of the main flow, the magnitude of the secondary flow, the direction of the bed shear stress, and the curvature-induced additional energy losses. It encompasses existing mild curvature models, remains valid for straight flow, and agrees satisfactorily with experimental data from laboratory experiments under conditions that are more demanding than sharp natural river bends. The proposed model reveals the mechanisms that drive the velocity redistribution in meander bends and their dependence on the river's roughness Cf, the flow depth H, the radius of curvature R, the width B, and bathymetric variations. It identifies Cf−1H/R as the major control parameter for meander hydrodynamics in general and the relative curvature R/B for sharp curvature effects. Both parameters are small in mildly curved bends but O(1) in sharply curved bends, resulting in significant differences in the flow dynamics. Streamwise curvature variations are negligible in mildly curved bends, but they are the major mechanisms for velocity redistribution in sharp bends. Nonlinear feedback between the main and secondary flow also plays a dominant role in sharp bends: it increases energy losses and reduces the secondary flow, the transverse bed slope, and the velocity redistribution.