Lower crustal variability and the crust/mantle transition at the Atlantis Massif oceanic core complex
Article first published online: 18 DEC 2010
Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.
Geophysical Research Letters
Volume 37, Issue 24, December 2010
How to Cite
2010), Lower crustal variability and the crust/mantle transition at the Atlantis Massif oceanic core complex, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L24303, doi:10.1029/2010GL045165., and (
- Issue published online: 18 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 18 DEC 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 19 OCT 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 12 OCT 2010
- Manuscript Received: 19 AUG 2010
Auxiliary material for this article contains details on instrument locations on the seafloor, additional record-sections showing data quality, illustrations of tomographic predictions and results using different starting models, and the tomographic results for Lines 9a and 9b.
Auxiliary material files may require downloading to a local drive depending on platform, browser, configuration, and size. To open auxiliary materials in a browser, click on the label. To download, Right-click and select “Save Target As…” (PC) or CTRL-click and select “Download Link to Disk” (Mac).
Additional file information is provided in the readme.txt.
|grl27525-sup-0001-readme.txt||plain text document||4K||readme.txt|
|grl27525-sup-0002-ts01.pdf||PDF document||15K||Table S1. Locations of relocated instruments along Line 8.|
|grl27525-sup-0003-ts02.pdf||PDF document||10K||Table S2. Locations of relocated instruments along Lines 9a and 9b.|
|grl27525-sup-0004-fs01.pdf||PDF document||225K||Figure S1. Details of the OBS refraction experiment at Atlantis Massif.|
|grl27525-sup-0005-fs02.pdf||PDF document||230K||Figure S2. Refracted arrivals recorded by ORB1 and OBH26 downward continued to the seafloor.|
|grl27525-sup-0006-fs03.pdf||PDF document||179K||Figure S3. Example of tests for Line 8 models with sharp Moho.|
|grl27525-sup-0007-fs04.pdf||PDF document||150K||Figure S4. Tomographic models for Lines 9a and 9b.|
|grl27525-sup-0008-fs05.pdf||PDF document||140K||Figure S5. Effect of starting model on tomographic result.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.