Ionosphere and Upper Atmosphere
A dynamical model of high-latitude convection derived from SuperDARN plasma drift measurements
Article first published online: 21 DEC 2010
DOI: 10.1029/2010JA016017
Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.
Issue
2169-9402/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=c95aab738f9359df0f217c15befc7ccc95c58657)
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics (1978–2012)
Volume 115, Issue A12, December 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
, and (2010), A dynamical model of high-latitude convection derived from SuperDARN plasma drift measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A12329, doi:10.1029/2010JA016017.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 21 DEC 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 7 OCT 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 23 SEP 2010
- Manuscript Received: 18 AUG 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- high-latitude convection;
- statistical model;
- empirical model;
- convection electric field
[1] A discrete set of climatological patterns of high-latitude ionospheric convection are derived using line-of-sight plasma drift data from the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). The patterns are derived independently for the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere and for varying solar wind, interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), and dipole tilt angle conditions. By interpolating between discrete patterns, a dynamical model of convection is obtained, which can uniquely specify the high-latitude electrostatic potential distribution for a wide range of solar wind, IMF, and dipole tilt parameter values. Accounting for solar wind velocity dependencies in convection leads to better resolving the large-scale convection pattern, as compared to previous statistical models based on SuperDARN data. It is shown that the mesoscale features of the climatological model compare favorably to the features seen in instantaneous patterns of convection observed with SuperDARN. Comparison of the model to other statistical or empirical models derived from ground- and space-based measurements shows good agreement with most models.

2169-9402/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=df55d32cfd4f0f0340de1de3b83cd98a40e7b2ea)
2169-9402/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=d3e6ebee460839fa06165bdd06e0752a25e77a8f)