Geophysical Research Letters

Direct observations of nitric oxide produced by energetic electron precipitation into the Antarctic middle atmosphere

Authors


Abstract

[1] We report the first ground-based passive microwave observations made from Troll station, Antarctica, which show enhanced mesospheric nitric oxide (NO) volume mixing ratio reaching levels of 1.2 ppmv, or 2–3 orders of magnitude above background, at 70–80 km during small, relatively isolated geomagnetic storms in 2008. The mesospheric NO peaked 2 days after enhanced NO at higher altitudes (110–150 km) measured by the SABER satellite, and 2 days after peaks in the >30 keV and >300 keV electron flux measured by POES, although the 300 keV electron flux remained high. High time resolution data shows that mesospheric NO was enhanced at night and decayed during the day and built up to high levels over a period of 3–4 days. The altitude profile of mesospheric NO suggests direct production by ∼300 keV electron precipitation. Simulations using the Sodankylä Ion and Neutral Chemistry model show that the delay between thermospheric and mesospheric NO enhancements was primarily a result of the weaker production rate at lower altitudes by ∼300 keV electrons competing against strong day-time losses.

1. Introduction

[2] The odd nitrogen (NOx) species nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are produced in the middle atmosphere by precipitating energetic electrons and protons [Brasseur and Solomon, 2005]. In the thermosphere and upper mesosphere NOx exists mainly as NO but below 70 km conversion to NO2 occurs [Solomon et al., 1982]. The chemical lifetime of NO in the sunlit mesosphere and lower thermosphere is typically one day [Solomon et al., 1999] although between 55 km and 85 km the lifetime may be as short as one hour [Shimazaki, 1984]. In darkness NOx is much longer lived and can be transported downward by the polar vortex at high latitudes during winter [Siskind et al., 2000]. Atmospheric circulation models and re-analysis meteorological data have indicated that changes in ozone abundance due to NOx arising from energetic particle precipitation can affect polar surface temperatures by as much as 4 K [Rozanov et al., 2005; Seppälä et al., 2009].

[3] NOx may be produced more frequently and persistently by energetic electron precipitation (EEP) from the Earth's magnetosphere than by solar protons [Randall et al., 2005]. However, it is unclear which electron energy range is most important for stratospheric chemistry. At auroral geomagnetic latitudes (70° < Λ < 75°) high flux of low energy (1–10 keV) electrons enter the atmosphere almost continuously [Baker et al., 2001] and are enhanced during substorms at night. However meridional circulation in the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere has been observed to show large variability and equatorward flow above 80–98 km at 68°S in winter [Sandford et al., 2010], which could act as a barrier to auroral NO entering the polar vortex and being efficiently transported downwards.

[4] Higher-energy (10 keV–several MeV) electrons precipitate from the radiation belts in the subauroral zone (Λ ≤ 75°) during magnetic storms, particularly in the southern hemisphere and pole-ward of the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) [Horne et al., 2009]. Although in general the precipitating flux decreases rapidly with increasing electron energy this mechanism can produce NOx directly in the stratosphere and mesosphere [Turunen et al., 2009].

[5] While NOx has been observed using satellite instruments such as the microwave limb sounder Odin-SMR [Murtagh et al., 2002], here we present vertical profiles of NO measured directly with unprecedented temporal resolution by a new passive microwave radiometer located pole-ward of the SAA, in Antarctica. The high time and altitude resolution enable us to determine the electron energy responsible for NOx production.

2. Microwave Radiometer Experimental Setup

[6] The microwave radiometer used in this study has been described previously [Espy et al., 2006] and only the NO measurement details are given here. Ground-based atmospheric observations at a 60° zenith angle were made from Troll station, Antarctica (72°01′S, 02°32′E, 1275 m above sea level). Troll is at a geomagnetic latitude of 65°, suitable for observing the effects of EEP from the outer radiation belt, and it is also typically inside the Antarctic polar vortex which extends to 60°S and from the mesosphere to approximately 16 km [Turunen et al., 2009].

[7] NO volume mixing ratio (VMR) profiles were inverted from calibrated, brightness temperature spectra of 14 kHz resolution and 10 MHz width, centered on the NO line at 250.796 GHz, using the Microwave Observation Line Estimation and Retrieval (MOLIERE) version 5 code [Urban et al., 2004]. A priori pressure, temperature, ozone, water vapor, and NO profiles above 30 km were calculated using the Sodankylä Ion and Neutral Chemistry (SIC, version 6.8) model [Verronen et al., 2002] under geomagnetically-quiet conditions. For altitudes up to 30 km MIPAS/Envisat (Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding) data were combined with 10-year (1999–2008) averages of ozonesonde data from Neumayer station (70°39′S, 08°15′W). Spectroscopic reference data for radiative transfer calculations were taken from HITRAN 2008 [Rothman et al., 2009]. Data inversion was performed from the ground to 120 km with 1 km-thick layers to ensure stable convergence. NO and water vapor profiles were adjusted in the forward model calculations to provide the best fit to the observed brightness temperatures. Radiometer data affected by weather conditions, or negative VMR values, were rejected.

[8] Figure 1a shows the atmospheric emission averaged for 2008 day 89 (29 March) where the maximum brightness-temperature change at 250.796 GHz due to NO is 0.3 K. The residual brightness temperature, i.e. the difference between the observation and final forward model spectrum using the retrieved parameters, shown in Figure 1a (bottom) indicates that the observational data are fitted to within the measurement uncertainty due to baseline noise of 0.03 K. The area of the normalized averaging kernels (Figure 1b) [Rodgers, 2000] is ≥0.5 for atmospheric layers between 35–83 km, indicating good information retrieval, although the measurements contribute to the retrieved NO VMR up to at least 90 km. The vertical resolution is estimated from the width of the averaging kernels to be 8 km. The retrieved NO VMRs shown in Figure 1b (right) are much higher than the a priori values for 70–90 km and reach 0.8 ppmv at 75–79 km. The measurement uncertainties shown in Figure 1b (right) are the diagonal elements of the measurement error covariance matrix. The NO VMR measurement error at each 1 km altitude level between 60 km and 90 km is ±0.1 ppmv for daily averages and ±0.3 ppmv for 3-hour averages. Instrument calibration and smoothing errors are not included in the current analysis and will be the subject of future work. Uncertainties in the pressure profile, or the air-broadening coefficient of the NO line, lead to a 3 km uncertainty in the NO altitude profiling. A 10% uncertainty in the atmospheric temperature profile changes the retrieved NO abundances by 30%, which is 1–2 orders of magnitude smaller than the NO variations shown later in the paper.

Figure 1.

(a) Example microwave brightness temperature spectrum for 2008 day 89, together with initial forward model (a priori), retrieved, and residual spectra and (b) averaging kernels for the inversion and a priori and retrieved NO profiles corresponding to the data in Figure 1a, both at 1 km intervals.

3. NO Observations

[9] The ground-based microwave observations for 2008, days 80–129 (20 March to 8 May) are compared in Figure 2 with NO 5.3 μm volume emission rate (VER) data for the lower thermosphere (100–150 km) from the SABER satellite instrument [Mlynczak, 1997]. Periods of enhanced NO VER can be seen (Figure 2a) at altitudes above 110 km where significant non-LTE 5.3 μm radiance occurs and can be measured by SABER. This occurs most strongly between days 86–90 and 114–118, but also less strongly on days 96–101 and 107–108. These coincide with increases in geomagnetic activity index Ap (Figure 2b). The two periods of highest VER occur within 24 hours of the days (87–88 and 114) with highest Ap and exhibit the 27-day repeatability that is associated with recurrent geomagnetic activity [Borovsky and Denton, 2006]. Higher thermospheric NO VER also corresponds closely with increased daily average electron count rate for the >30 keV channel of the SEM-2 MEPED instrument onboard the low altitude (∼800 km) POES satellites at 60° < Λ < 65° (Figure 2b).

Figure 2.

(a) SABER NO 5.3 μm VER for 65°S–75°S, (b) MEPED >30 keV channel trapped and quasi-trapped electron flux and 3-hour average Ap index, (c) Microwave radiometer daily average NO VMR, (d) MEPED >300 keV channel trapped and quasi-trapped electron flux and 3-hour average Ap index, (e) Correlation between the SABER NO 5.3 μm VER for 65°S–75°S averaged over 120–130 km and the time-shifted Ap index and MEPED >30 keV channel trapped and quasi-trapped electron flux time series, and (f) Correlation between the microwave radiometer daily NO VMR averaged over 70–80 km and the time-shifted Ap index and MEPED >300 keV channel trapped and quasi-trapped electron flux time series.

[10] The radiometer observations (Figure 2c) also show periods of enhanced NO, lasting 3–5 days, but at lower altitudes in the range 70–85 km. Daily average VMR reaches approximately 1.2 ppmv at 73–80 km on day 91, approximately two to three orders of magnitude above typical background levels (10–100 ppbv) at this time of year. A particularly striking feature is that the enhanced NO VMR below 85 km occurs 2–3 days after the enhancement above 110 km.

[11] The 70–85 km altitude where NO VMR is enhanced (Figure 2c) corresponds to a peak in ionization produced by ∼300 keV electrons [Turunen et al., 2009], assuming precipitation by a mono-energetic electron beam. However, the MEPED >300 keV electron count rate (Figure 2d) reaches a maximum 1–2 days before the peak in VMR at 70–80 km and then decreases after day 88 while NO continues to increase. Although we make use of MEPED measurements of the 90° telescope “trapped” electrons (and not the 0° “precipitating” measurements due to strong contamination in this telescope [Rodger et al., 2010]), our experience shows that the precipitation generally follows variations in the trapped electron flux.

[12] Correlation coefficient values were calculated by comparing the 50-day observed NO data-sets with the Ap index and MEPED electron count rate data time shifted by a range of lag times. The largest correlation, with r = 0.94, was calculated with a lag time of 0.0 days between the NO SABER VER and >30 keV electron count rate, as shown in Figure 2e. For SABER NO VER and Ap index the largest correlation is r = 0.66 for a lag time of 0.1 days. The radiometer NO VMR data is moderately correlated with >300 keV electron count rate (r = 0.67, lag time of 0.9 days) and Ap index (r = 0.48, lag time of 2.0 days), as seen in Figure 2f.

[13] To understand NO variability in more detail, Figure 3b shows higher resolution, 3-hourly profiles for the most intense geomagnetic storm period, days 86–94 (26 March to 4 April 2008). NO increases during day 88, diminishes during sunlit hours and continues to increase each night until day 90. Thereafter the microwave signal was attenuated by increased surface-level humidity (days 90.5–94) and possibly by blown snow when wind speeds were above 20 ms−1 (Figure 3a). The H2O profile was adjusted in the radiative transfer model to reproduce the observed attenuation during this period but this meant that limited NO information could be retrieved from the 3-hour averages under these conditions. The daily profiles (Figure 2c) are more robust, due to the longer integration time, and confirm that NO remained above 0.5 ppmv between days 90.5 and 93.0 with recovery to background levels by the end of day 94.

Figure 3.

(a) Surface-level water vapour VMR and wind speed from meteorological observations at Troll station, Antarctica, where higher values lead to attenuation of the NO signal received by the microwave radiometer; (b) microwave radiometer 3-hour average NO VMR; (c) SIC model NO VMR; and (d) ionization rate profile used in SIC model to generate result shown in Figure 3c.

4. Ion-Neutral Chemistry Modeling

[14] Two key processes that could account for the observed diurnal variability of NO in the upper mesosphere are production by EEP and loss by photolysis [Brasseur and Solomon, 2005]. To test this the SIC model [Verronen et al., 2002] was used to calculate NO VMR for different flux of 300 keV electrons. There is currently large uncertainty in how the flux of different electron energies varies with magnetic local time (MLT). During large geomagnetic storms >150 keV electron precipitation fluxes have been observed to be higher on the dayside than at night [Rodger et al., 2007], whereas studies combining averages of satellite data and model data show 30 keV −1 MeV precipitation tending to maximize near dawn [Lam et al., 2010]. However, statistical analysis of direct POES observations shows >300 keV precipitation remaining high throughout the night during the main phase of geomagnetic storms [Horne et al., 2009]. Therefore we applied precipitation in the SIC model for 4 consecutive nights between 1500–0300 UTC, corresponding to days 87–90 when the MEPED >300 keV electron count rate was >750 s−1. The model was run with different 300 keV electron flux levels and timings but only the results for a total precipitation flux of 3.14 × 106 cm−2s−1 are shown. Runs with lower electron flux yielded peak NO VMR over the same altitude range, i.e. 70 km to 80 km, but with less accumulation over consecutive days due to the linear response of NO production to ionization rate. Reducing the duration of the night-time precipitation pulses also led to greater diurnal variability of NO.

[15] Figure 3c shows that the NO calculated by the SIC model has a diurnal variation that is similar to the microwave observations and which gradually increases at 70–80 km over a period of 3–4 days. However, the model VMR does not decay in sunlight to the low levels measured by the radiometer. On days 88–90 the model NO VMR does not drop below 0.6 ppmv, somewhat above the estimated measurement detection limit of 0.3 ppmv. This suggests that either the loss in sunlight is underestimated, which is unlikely, or that electron precipitation in the model should be lower, or have a much larger diurnal variation. Higher resolution data are required to test this and are not yet available. When the EEP is switched off in the model after day 90 the NO decays back to near-background levels by the end of day 94, as observed by the radiometer. The NO above 87 km is due to solar soft X-rays (2–10 nm) [e.g. Solomon et al., 1982] and much weaker ionization produced by the 300 keV electrons. Model runs with and without the energetic electron source, while keeping all other forcings unchanged, confirm that ∼300 keV electrons, rather than solar soft X-rays, are the main source of NO production below 87 km.

5. Conclusion

[16] The data show that while NO above 110 km can be directly related to enhanced >30 keV electron flux, increases in mesospheric (70–80 km) NO was delayed by 1–2 days with respect to the enhancements in the >30 keV and >300 keV electron flux. However, higher (3-hour) resolution data and modeling strongly suggest that between 2008, days 86 and 94 (26 March to 4 April) the NO at 70–80 km was produced directly by the precipitation of ∼300 keV electrons. The diurnal variation and gradual build up of mesospheric NO over 3–4 days, rather than an immediate increase with electron flux, indicate that production was competing strongly against day-time losses. Thus the delay between thermospheric and mesospheric NO enhancements was primarily a result of the weaker production rate at lower altitudes by ∼300 keV electrons. More detailed calculations could be carried out using daily measured >300 keV electron flux as the time dependent driver for the model, although comparison with observations may be limited by the lack of 3-hour average NO VMR data after day 90, as well as the ±0.3 ppmv uncertainty and detection limit of these measurements.

[17] The data and simulations did not show evidence of downward descent from higher altitudes, so that even weak geomagnetic storms can directly elevate mesospheric NO abundance to 1.2 ppmv, which is two to three orders of magnitude above the background level at this time of year. Were such NOx production by EEP to occur during winter-time, significant NO and NO2 could accumulate in the high-latitude mesosphere and be transported vertically downwards within the polar vortex to the stratosphere.

Acknowledgments

[18] AS was supported by the European Commission project FP7-PEOPLE-IEF-2008/237461. We thank Atle Markussen, Paul Breen, and Joachim Urban for their help. The Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) and The Research Council of Norway are acknowledged for providing meteorological data. This work was supported in part by the UK Natural Environment Research Council. The authors thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments.

[19] The Editor wishes to thank two anonymous reviewers for their assistance evaluating this paper.

Ancillary