SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Asian pollution;
  • IASI;
  • outflow;
  • remote infrared sounding

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Anthropogenic SO2 and the November Event
  5. 3. Composition, Columns and Comparisons
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

[1] Using 3 years worth of IASI (the Infrared Atmospheric Sounder Interferometer aboard METOP-A) measurements, we have identified 24 major events of uplift and transport of anthropogenic sulfur dioxide. These were all first observed over East Asia, and could be traced for over 60 hours. On 7 November 2010 a sulfur dioxide plume was observed over Northeast China and tracked for five days to North America. We discuss this event in detail with respect to build up; uplift and in-plume chemistry. We found a host of trace gas enhancements in the plume (SO2, CO, PAN, CH3OH, HCOOH and C2H2). A reasonable to very good agreement was found with MOZART-4 modeled ambient columns for all species except methanol, which was underestimated by the model by an order of magnitude. We calculate correlations of the different species and give observational evidence of secondary in-plume formation of methanol and PAN.

1. Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Anthropogenic SO2 and the November Event
  5. 3. Composition, Columns and Comparisons
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

[2] Transport of pollution has an impact on atmospheric composition, chemistry and air quality across continents from the boundary layer up to stratosphere. Its importance has been established through a large number of model studies and in situ measurements [see, e.g., Liang et al., 2004; Heald et al., 2003; Talbot et al., 2003; Kritz et al., 1990; Chin et al., 2007; Stohl, 2001; Fiedler et al., 2009; Barrie, 1986; Law and Stohl, 2007; Jaffe et al., 1999]. Outflow from East Asia is largely controlled by monsoons and throughout the year reaches North America either via the North Pacific or via the Arctic (mostly in the winter) [Stohl et al., 2002]. Uplift and export mechanisms have a strong seasonal variability with spring being the most favorable period for transpacific transport due to active weather associated with frequent ascending air parcels and fast moving westerly winds [Liu et al., 2003; Russo et al., 2003].

[3] The IASI infrared sounder [Clerbaux et al., 2009] aboard MetOp-A has twice a day global coverage, which allows detection and analysis of the evolution of atmospheric plumes such as those arising from a volcanic eruption [Clarisse et al., 2008] or biomass burning [Coheur et al., 2009]. Here for the first time we use IASI to study transport of anthropogenic pollution plumes and analyze a particular plume first spotted above East Asia on 7 November 2010. IASI has a good spectral resolution, which permits measurement of a variety of trace gases [Clarisse et al., 2011]. For this event we were able to measure plume enhancements of carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN), formic acid (HCOOH), acetylene (C2H2), methanol (CH3OH) and their evolution in time as the plume diluted and underwent chemistry and washout. It is the first study of this type as satellite studies of Asian anthropogenic outflow have traditionally been focused on CO [Turquety et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2006] and aerosols [Yu et al., 2008; Di Pierro et al., 2011]. Infrared sounders are generally not sensitive to anthropogenic SO2; and we therefore start section 2 by giving an overview of the frequency and seasonality of such anthropogenic SO2 observations, before describing the event observed in November 2010. In section 3 we give a quantitative analysis of the event for the reported trace species and briefly compare with outputs from the MOZART model.

2. Anthropogenic SO2 and the November Event

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Anthropogenic SO2 and the November Event
  5. 3. Composition, Columns and Comparisons
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

[4] While UV-vis instruments routinely measure anthropogenic SO2 [Lee et al., 2011], this is not the case for infrared instruments which have limited sensitivity to boundary layer SO2. For the ν3 absorption band of SO2 (which is the strongest absorption band in the infrared) this is due to competing, and dominating water vapor absorption in the same spectral range. When SO2 is observed in this band it must be present in a significant amount at altitudes above the lower troposphere (5–7 km depending on the water vapor profile and SO2 concentrations [Clarisse et al., 2008]).

[5] We have analyzed SO2 retrievals for the complete period October 2007–December 2010 in search of anthropogenic emissions of SO2. Because of frequent volcanic activity, especially in the Northern Hemisphere, the produced imagery was analyzed manually and cross checked with volcanic activity reports from the USGS (http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/usgs/). In total we identified 24 major events where an apparent non-volcanic SO2 plume was observed with loadings above 5 km exceeding ∼5 1016 molecules/cm2 and which was visible for at least 5 consecutive IASI overpasses (21/2 days). All these were first observed over East Asia and Siberia; while transport was mainly observed over the Russian Arctic, Japan, Sakhalin and Kamchatka. There is a marked seasonality in the events with 12 events observed in the fall, 9 in the winter and 3 in the spring.

[6] A first prerequisite for such large events to happen and for infrared sounders to see them, is the availability of large concentrations of SO2. Note first that emissions of SO2 only show a weak seasonal pattern [Streets et al., 2003]. In colder periods, the lifetime of SO2 is however longer (a factor 2–3 in winter [Chin and Jacob, 1996; Lee et al., 2011]) because of slower dry deposition and less availability of oxidants. Furthermore, SO2 is half-soluble and subject to wet scavenging. Over East Asia, precipitation has a marked seasonality, with fall and winter being very dry and spring and especially summer very wet. Enhanced with trapping of boundary layer air due to inversion, fall and winter are therefore favorable periods for the build up of large concentrations of SO2. The second prerequisite is an efficient uplift mechanism to altitudes above 5 km. The occurrence of midlatitude cyclones and the associated warm conveyor belts are the main source of uplift to the mid-upper troposphere and occur frequently in fall and winter (note that these occur less frequent in the summer) [Stohl, 2001; Liang et al., 2004; Yienger et al., 2000].

[7] This seasonality is very different as compared to CO, which is known to exhibit most transpacific transport in the spring (and to lesser extent in the summer). This can be seen e.g. from looking at monthly averages of CO [Clerbaux et al., 2009, Figure 5]. To understand this apparent contradiction, it is important to take into account the seasonality in the number of uplift events, the availability of source material and the altitude of transport. In the work of Liang et al. [2004] it was shown that the number of uplift events does not exhibit a strong seasonality (although the uplift mechanism can be different, e.g. in summer convective lifting is more important). However, in spring and summer, the amount of CO that is lifted and transported is larger due to larger source availability. Secondly, here we have only taken into account SO2 transport events above 5 km, while the well known seasonality of CO transport includes transport at all altitude levels. Finally, the number of large uplift events might not be a good indication of the total amount of transported material, for which also a large number of smaller events can contribute.

[8] On 7 November 2010, IASI observed a SO2 plume covering almost the whole of Northeast China and subsequent overpasses show the plume moving over the Sea of Japan, Northern Pacific, Gulf of Alaska and Canada. The last observations was made 5 days later near Hudson bay (see Figure S1 and Animation S1 in the auxiliary material). Fortuitous overpasses of the space-borne lidar Calipso [Winker et al., 2009] revealed coincident aerosol features between 6 and 9 km which were identified as smoke and in the later stages as sulfate. For all but the first overpass there was part of the aerosol curtain which contained no detectable clouds, and these were selected for Figure S1 in the auxiliary material.

[9] In terms of meteorology, the week prior the event was characterized by low surface winds and a total absence of rain. These stagnant conditions led to build up of pollutants as reflected in the steady increase of the Daily Air Pollution Index [Gao et al., 2011] of several megacities in Northeast China during that week (see Figure 1, left). Weather maps of the 6th and the 7th November show an intensifying baroclinic cyclone over Northeast China and Korea forming thick clouds and accompanying rain further northeast of this area. The associated warm conveyor belt is no doubt responsible for the lofting and entraining of the local pollutants picked up by IASI. Note that associated cloud formation is important because of potential washout of pollutants and the remote sensing challenge of dealing with optical thick clouds. These can hamper the retrieval and, as we will see further, bias it low.

image

Figure 1. (left) Daily Air Pollution Index from selected cities in China. The air quality decreases from 1 to 7 November and is attributed to build-up of pollution. On the 8th a drastic improvement is apparent, coincident with the IASI observation of the SO2 plume shown on the right. (right) Location of selected cities (colored dots) and maximum observed SO2 columns (in units 1016 molecules/cm2) for the period 7–11 November 2010.

Download figure to PowerPoint

3. Composition, Columns and Comparisons

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Anthropogenic SO2 and the November Event
  5. 3. Composition, Columns and Comparisons
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

[10] Comparison of SO2 data with near real time CO retrievals [George et al., 2009] reveal coincident enhancements. To assess enhancements of other species in the plume, differences of averaged spectra inside the plume (using spectra with SO2 columns above ∼5 1016 molecules/cm2) and outside the plume (spectra with no detectable SO2) were made. This technique allows detection of weak absorbers, as it reduces noise and removes a large part of the spectral signatures due to the strong absorbers (CO2, O3, H2O [Karagulian et al., 2010]). Unambiguous identification of CO (3 K), PAN (0.4 K), HCOOH (0.5 K), C2H2 (1 K), CH3OH (0.4 K) was possible for each overpass. Here the numbers in brackets are averaged observed signal strengths and these emerge well above the IASI noise (∼0.2 K on an individual spectrum).

[11] For all detected species, we have performed optimal estimation retrievals using Atmosphit [Coheur et al., 2005, 2009], limiting the retrieval of the target species between 6 and 9 km (except for CO which was fitted from 0 to 15 km). Cloudy scenes are problematic since clouds are not directly taken into account by Atmosphit. Thin clouds or small cloud fractions can be compensated by a correction in surface temperature, but thick clouds distort the baseline shape and lead to diverging fits. For this reason we have performed optimal estimation retrievals only for spectra with a cloud coverage below 10%. Unfortunately, especially for the first overpasses, the cloud fraction was very high (73% clouds on average for the first overpass, see Table 1), resulting in only few retrievals, mostly on the plume edge (and thus missing the highest loadings). Recently, Walker et al. [2011] introduced a method of detecting weakly absorbing species yielding an apparent column amount. For fixed atmospheric conditions and far away from saturation, the apparent column is linearly related with the true column amount. We have implemented the detection using the so-called ensemble method from Walker et al. [2011] and confirmed a strong linear correlation (between 0.75 and 0.95) between apparent and observed columns. This was used to obtain true column amounts for all pixels in and around the observed SO2 plume. This method does not work for CO, which is a strong absorber with a saturating spectral signature and omnipresent in the atmosphere.

Table 1. Overview of the eventa
DayClouds (%)Size (km2)CH3OHHCOOHCOSO2PANC2H2
  • a

    First column is the date (in November 2010); and the overpass (morning or evening). The second column is the average cloud coverage from the IASI level 2 data. The third column is the size of the plume as estimated from the SO2 retrievals. The remaining columns are maximum observed column enhancements (averaging the 10 highest observations) in molecules/cm2. For the species which correlate well with CO the enhancement ratio or slope ΔX/ΔCO is shown in brackets in units of 10−3. The first line (07AM) represent maximum MOZART4 modeled columns below 800 hPa over the likely source area prior to the event.

07AM--0.30e160.55e162.00e185.00e16 (25)0.40e16 (1.5)0.75e16 (3.0)
07PM730.6e63.17e161.00e161.65e185.93e16 (25)0.75e16 (3.8)1.00e16 (4.7)
08AM611.0e63.91e161.25e161.80e186.27e16 (21)1.04e16 (3.6)1.05e16 (4.3)
08PM471.4e64.04e161.55e162.01e186.46e16 (26)1.69e16 (4.0)1.12e16 (4.1)
09AM341.6e63.42e161.26e161.58e185.42e16 (25)1.13e16 (4.7)0.82e16 (3.1)
09PM361.1e63.16e161.20e161.58e185.17e16 (24)1.05e16 (3.6)0.80e16 (2.6)
10AM361.1e63.20e161.03e161.21e184.87e16 (26)0.81e16 (3.7)0.64e16 (3.1)
10PM170.7e62.84e160.99e161.23e184.55e16 (28)0.63e16 (3.1)0.72e16 (2.4)
11AM70.4e62.74e160.94e160.70e184.00e16 (22)0.48e16 (2.8)0.57e16 (2.7)
11PM80.3e62.69e160.76e160.92e183.59e16 (29)0.38e16 (0.8)0.49e16 (2.3)

[12] The retrievals obtained in this way are illustrated for SO2, HCOOH, C2H2 and PAN in Figure 2 and summarized in Table 1, which contains maximum measured columns (mean of the largest ten observations). For CO, mean out-of-plume columns were subtracted from the total columns and as the other species were not detected outside the plume we can interpret all columns as in-plume enhancements. For all species maximum loadings were detected on the third overpass (evening overpass of the 8th), indicating underestimated loadings for the first two overpasses due to cloud coverage.

image

Figure 2. Example retrievals on 8 November 2011, PM of C2H2, SO2, PAN and HCOOH in units 1016 molecules/cm2. While the abundances of these species correlate well (see also Figure S2 in the auxiliary material), the shape and location of the plume match almost perfectly. It can also be noted that HCOOH is only barely detectable in parts of the plume.

Download figure to PowerPoint

[13] By inter-comparing the different species, more can be said on the in-plume chemistry and lifetime. CO and C2H2 abundances are usually correlated in the atmosphere [Xiao et al., 2007]. Because of difference in lifetime, the ratio C2H2/CO or enhancement ratio ΔC2H2/ΔCO can be used as a tracer of air mass age. We found an average correlation coefficient of 0.59. The initial value for the enhancement ratio was found to be 4.7 10−3, with the slope declining to 2.3 10−3 for the aged plume. These values were obtained from linear regression of all measurements in the plume. The initial value matches closely the reported emission average of 4.8 10−3 [Xiao et al., 2007] for East Asia.

[14] The best correlation with CO was found with PAN with an average correlation coefficient of 0.68. PAN production peaks in the summer, however photochemical production of PAN can also be elevated outside the summer and thermal stability at lower temperatures can account for increased concentrations [Brice et al., 1988; Tsalkani et al., 1987]. Its enhancement ratio with CO was initially ∼3.7 10−3, increased to ∼4.7 10−3 and then dropped the last day to ∼0.8 10−3. On the third overpass remarkably high columns were measured (more than a factor two of what was observed during the first overpass). This increase is much larger than any of the other species, and therefore unlikely related to the cloud retrieval problem. It is indicative of secondary formation within the plume.

[15] All four species: PAN, C2H2, CO and SO2 correlated well with each other throughout the event, with correlation coefficients above 0.5. Correlations with HCOOH and CH3OH were lower (in the range 0.2–0.5). This is mostly due to the larger noise of their retrievals (see Figure 2). Formic acid and methanol are emitted biogenically, with production peaking in the growing season, but also by fires, combustion and other anthropogenic activities [Stavrakou et al., 2011]. The main sink of formic acid is wet deposition, and concentrations are hence strongly linked with rainfall [see, e.g., Zhang et al., 2011]. As there was no precipitation in the week building up to the event, it is not surprising that this species was observed here. Of all the observed species, methanol abundances have the slowest decrease rate from the third to the last overpass, see Table 1 (slower than SO2 or the long-lived CO). Since dispersion of the plume is the same for all observed species, and since dispersion is the main reason for the observed decrease in CO abundances, the slower decrease of CH3OH is strongly suggestive for in-plume formation, probably related to the oxidation of volatile organic compounds.

[16] We have also carried out a comparison of our measured columns with MOZART-4, driven by NCEP/GFS meteorology (see http://www.acd.ucar.edu/acresp/forecast/for the figures), in order to see how a state of the art global chemistry transport model deals with such an event of strong uplift and long range transport. From the CO maps, outflow to the Pacific is obvious on the 8th of November. Transport is much slower though, as by the 11th the plume is still modeled over the Western Pacific, because of an underestimation of uplift and altitude. This is not surprising as modeling uplift and subsequent circulation through moist adiabatic storms is highly non-trivial. To assess the chemistry modeling of the build up, our measured columns have been compared with maximum measured columns below 800 hPa in the morning of the 7th over the likely source area. Modeled columns agree well for CO, C2H2 and SO2 but are underestimated for formic acid and PAN (almost a factor two) and especially methanol (a factor ten). These species are not surprisingly those which are least monitored (e.g. to our knowledge there has not been a single recent in-situ campaign aimed at measuring wintertime PAN in North East Asia).

[17] This study provides a detailed analysis of one of the 24 identified events of major uplift and transport of anthropogenic sulfur dioxide. It is a first demonstration of how IASI is able to monitor outflow and chemistry of a range of primary and secondary pollutants. As retrieval techniques and instrumental characteristics of infrared sounders continue to improve, we expect it to be possible to monitor outflow of Asian pollution of a series of trace gases on a more regular basis, offering the modeling community unprecedented validation opportunities.

Acknowledgments

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Anthropogenic SO2 and the November Event
  5. 3. Composition, Columns and Comparisons
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

[18] IASI has been developed and built under the responsibility of the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES, France). It is flown onboard the Metop satellites as part of the EUMETSAT Polar System. The IASI L1 data are received through the EUMETCast near real time data distribution service. L. Clarisse and P.-F. Coheur are Postdoctoral Researcher and Research Associate (Chercheur Qualifié), respectively, with F.R.S.-FNRS. C. Clerbaux is grateful to CNES for scientific collaboration and financial support. The research in Belgium was funded by the F.R.S.-FNRS (M.I.S. nF.4511.08), the Belgian State Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs and the European Space Agency (ESA-Prodex arrangements C90-327). Financial support by the ‘Actions de Recherche Concertées’ (Communauté Française de Belgique) is also acknowledged.

[19] The Editor thanks two anonymous reviewers for their assistance in evaluating this paper.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Anthropogenic SO2 and the November Event
  5. 3. Composition, Columns and Comparisons
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Anthropogenic SO2 and the November Event
  5. 3. Composition, Columns and Comparisons
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References
  8. Supporting Information

Auxiliary material for this article contains additional figures illustrating the export of pollution from East Asia observed in November 2010.

Auxiliary material files may require downloading to a local drive depending on platform, browser, configuration, and size. To open auxiliary materials in a browser, click on the label. To download, Right-click and select “Save Target As…” (PC) or CTRL-click and select “Download Link to Disk” (Mac).

Additional file information is provided in the readme.txt.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
grl28493-sup-0001-readme.txtplain text document2Kreadme.txt
grl28493-sup-0002-fs01.epsPS document3025KFigure S1. CALIPSO aerosol timeseries of the November event.
grl28493-sup-0003-ms01.gifGIF image239KAnimation S1. IASI SO2 animation of the November event.
grl28493-sup-0004-fs02.epsPS document188KFigure S2. Scatter plot of CO versus other detected species.
grl28493-sup-0005-t01.txtplain text document1KTab-delimited Table 1.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.