SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • CalNex;
  • WSOC;
  • organic aerosol;
  • urban aerosol

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

[1] A particle-into-liquid sampler coupled to a total organic carbon analyzer (PILS-TOC) quantified particulate water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) mass concentrations during the May 2010 deployment of the Center for Interdisciplinary Remotely Piloted Aircraft Studies (CIRPAS) Twin Otter in the CalNex field study. WSOC data collected during 16 flights provide the first spatiotemporal maps of WSOC in the San Joaquin Valley, Los Angeles Basin, and outflow regions of the Basin. WSOC was consistently higher in concentration within the Los Angeles Basin, where sea breeze transport and Basin topography strongly influence the spatial distribution of WSOC. The highest WSOC levels were associated with fire plumes, highlighting the importance of both primary and secondary sources for WSOC in the region. Residual pollution layers enriched with WSOC are observed aloft up to an altitude of 3.2 km and the highest WSOC levels for each flight were typically observed above 500 m. Simultaneous ground WSOC measurements during aircraft overpasses in Pasadena and Riverside typically exhibit lower levels, especially when relative humidity (RH) was higher aloft suggestive of the influence of aerosol-phase water. This points to the underestimation of the radiative effects of WSOC when using only surface measurements. Reduced aerosol-phase water in the eastern desert outflow region likely promotes the re-partitioning of WSOC to the gas phase and suppression of processes to produce these species (partitioning, multiphase chemistry, photolytic production); as a result, WSOC is reduced relative to sulfate (but not as much as nitrate) as aerosol is advected from the Basin to the outflows.

1. Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

[2] The spatiotemporal distribution of aerosol chemical composition is influential in aerosol interactions with water vapor and radiation. Organics are of major importance in this regard as they typically represent between 20 and 90% of fine aerosol mass [Kanakidou et al., 2005]. As it is virtually impossible to speciate and quantify the entire spectrum of particulate organic compounds, it is useful to examine classes of organic species. A key category of particulate organics is water-soluble organic species, where water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) has been shown to account for between 40 and 85% of the global organic carbon (OC) budget [Ruellan et al., 1999; Graham et al., 2002; Mayol-Bracero et al., 2002; Jaffrezo et al., 2005; Decesari et al., 2006]. In the absence of biomass burning, WSOC is often considered a proxy for secondary organic aerosol (SOA) due to the oxidized nature of these species as compared to other organics.

[3] Two widely studied areas in the United States with regard to atmospheric aerosol properties and composition include the Los Angeles Basin [Hidy et al., 1974; Grosjean and Friedlander, 1975; Husar et al., 1976, 1977; Blumenthal et al., 1978; Russell et al., 1983; McElroy and Smith, 1986; Russell and Cass, 1984, 1986; Kawamura and Kaplan, 1987; Wall et al., 1988; Pandis et al., 1992a, 1992b; Zhang et al., 1993; Chow et al., 1994; Hildemann et al., 1994a, 1994b, 1996; Eldering and Cass, 1996; Kleeman et al., 1999; Collins et al., 2000; Hughes et al., 2000; Neuman et al., 2003; Sardar et al., 2005; Vutukuru et al., 2006; Docherty et al., 2008; Hersey et al., 2011] and the San Joaquin Valley of California [Magliano et al., 1999; Schauer and Cass, 2000; Chow et al., 1992, 1993, 1996, 2006; Neuman et al., 2003; Sorooshian et al., 2008a]. While these studies have provided significant knowledge of regional aerosol characteristics, there remain important uncertainties with regard to organic aerosol composition and properties. There are particularly limited airborne measurements that have attempted to characterize the organic composition of aerosol in the Los Angeles Basin and downwind regions.

[4] Recent ground-based measurements in Pasadena, CA between May and September 2009 indicate that organics account for on average between 40 and 60% of the western Los Angeles Basin sub-micrometer aerosol mass [Hersey et al., 2011]. The oxidation state of the Pasadena organic aerosol, as expressed by the atomic oxygen:carbon ratio (O:C) was relatively stable (∼0.5) for periods of weeks with little difference at different times of the day. Water-soluble organics were estimated to account for between ∼30–70% of the organic mass [Wonaschütz et al., 2011]. Measurements by Peltier et al. [2007a] during the SOAR-1 campaign at Riverside, CA (summer 2005) showed that WSOC accounted for an approximate average of 52% of OC mass. Understanding the main sources and production mechanisms of WSOC in the Los Angeles Basin based on measurements at a fixed site has limitations owing to the meteorology of the Basin and the spatial distribution of the sources that lead to organic aerosol. For example, Wonaschütz et al. [2011] showed that the diurnal WSOC profile at Pasadena is governed by a combination of sea breeze winds, boundary layer height, and secondary production along the trajectory of air parcels in the Basin. Constraining the spatiotemporal nature of the amount, composition, and vertical distribution of particulate organic matter is critical as aerosol hygroscopicity in the region is largely governed by the organic mass fraction.

[5] In this work, detailed measurements of the nature and character of WSOC in the Los Angeles Basin and outflow regions were performed using both airborne and ground-based sampling during the California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) study in May 2010. Ground-based measurements of WSOC were carried out at two CalNex ground sites. Aircraft overpasses of the ground sites enabled a simultaneous comparison of WSOC in the same vertical column. We address the temporal and spatial variation of WSOC, with an aim to understand the factors that influence WSOC concentrations such as sources, transport and aging, topography, and meteorology. The structure of this paper is as follows: (i) overview of experimental methods; (ii) cumulative summary of WSOC measurements (e.g., vertical profiles, spatial maps, and relationships with other chemical and meteorological variables); (iii) detailed case studies of specific flights; (iv) conceptual model of the nature of WSOC in the study region; and (v) conclusions.

2. Experimental Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

[6] A total of 18 flights were carried out with the Center for Interdisciplinary Remotely Piloted Aircraft Studies (CIRPAS) Twin Otter during the 2010 CalNex study between 4 May 2010 and 28 May 2010 (Table 1). WSOC was quantified during 16 flights, using a particle-into-liquid sampler (PILS; Brechtel Manufacturing Inc.) coupled to a Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analyzer (Sievers Model 800) [Sullivan et al., 2006]. Briefly, particles smaller than 2.5 μm in diameter are sampled by the PILS and passed immediately through an organic carbon denuder (Sunset Laboratory Inc.) to remove organic vapors. Particles are grown into droplets, collected by inertial impaction, and delivered through a 0.5 μm PEEK (polyetheretherketone) liquid filter prior to entering a TOC analyzer for quantification of WSOC every ∼4 s. Reported WSOC levels represent the difference between the measured and background concentrations, which were obtained by passing sampled air through a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter. The overall measurement uncertainty is estimated to be approximately 10%, with a minimum detection limit of 0.1 μg C m−3. Synchronization of WSOC measurements with the other aircraft instrument data described below takes into account well-documented liquid transport delays in the PILS instrument [Sorooshian et al., 2006].

Table 1. Summary of CIRPAS Twin Otter Research Flights (RF)a
RFFlight DateDay of WeekFlight Time (UTC)Mission Type
  • a

    Local time = UTC – seven hours.

  • b

    WSOC measurements are not available.

15/4/2010Tuesday18:01–21:23LA Basin
25/5/2010Wednesday18:04–22:10LA Basin
35/6/2010Thursday19:06–22:59LA Basin
45/7/2010Friday18:02–21:57LA Basin
55/10/2010Monday19:00–23:05LA Basin
65/12/2010Wednesday17:56–22:08LA Basin + Salton Sea
75/13/2010Thursday18:05–21:54LA Basin + Salton Sea
85/14/2010Friday17:59–22:01LA Basin
95/15/2010Saturday18:13–22:13LA Basin
105/18/2010Tuesday18:59–22:53San Joaquin Valley
115/19/2010Wednesday18:40–22:45LA Basin
125/20/2010Thursday18:53–22:58San Joaquin Valley + Cajon Pass
135/21/2010Friday17:57–22:05LA Basin + Cajon/Banning Passes
14b5/22/2010Saturday18:01–22:12San Joaquin Valley
15b5/24/2010Monday18:01–22:03LA Basin + Cajon Pass + Salton Sea
165/25/2010Tuesday18:27–22:31LA Basin + Cajon Pass + Salton Sea
175/27/2010Thursday17:59–21:45LA Basin
185/28/2010Friday17:58–22:03LA Basin

[7] Contemporaneous with the airborne measurements, online PM2.5 WSOC measurements were carried out at two ground sites (Pasadena and Riverside) with the same instrument set-up as on the aircraft. The Pasadena CalNex ground site was located on the California Institute of Technology campus (34.1406°N, −118.1225°W). The Riverside site was located on the University of California-Riverside campus (33.9719°N, −117.3227°W). The sample inlet was 7 m above ground level at the Pasadena ground site, and 4.5 m above ground level at Riverside.

[8] Measurements of sub-micrometer inorganic and non-refractory organic mass were obtained with an Aerodyne compact Time of Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (C-ToF-AMS) [Drewnick et al., 2005; Murphy et al., 2009]. AMS data used here include organic markers at specific mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) that serve as proxies for organics with a range of oxidation states: acid-like oxygenated organics (m/z 44 = COO+), aliphatic and non-acid oxygenated organics (m/z 43 = C3H7+ and C2H3O+), and aliphatic organics (m/z 57 = C4H9+) [McLafferty and Turecek, 1993; Zhang et al., 2005; Aiken et al., 2008; Ng et al., 2010]. Owing to the size cutoff of the AMS being smaller than the PILS (1 μm versus 2.5 μm), any mass ratios between WSOC and AMS measurements represent an upper limit.

[9] Particle size distribution measurements (Dp = 10 nm–800 nm) on the aircraft were carried out with a cylindrical scanning differential mobility analyzer (DMA; TSI Model 3081) coupled to a condensation particle counter (CPC; TSI Model 3760), in addition to a passive cavity aerosol spectrometer probe (PCASP; Dp = 100 nm–2.6 μm). WSOC data are usually compared only to PCASP data in this study owing to similar size bins, while DMA data are used only when PCASP data were not available (Table 2). Sub-saturated aerosol hygroscopicity measurements were provided by a differential aerosol sizing and hygroscopicity spectrometer probe at relative humidities of 74% and 92% and for dry diameters ranging between 150–225 nm (DASH-SP; Brechtel Mfg Inc. [Sorooshian et al., 2008b]). Black carbon (BC) measurements were obtained using a single particle soot photometer instrument (SP2; Droplet Measurement Technologies).

Table 2. Summary of Measurements in the Vicinity of Banning Pass (33.89°N, 33.98°N; −116.77°W, −116.99°W)a
RFLocal Time of DayWSOC (μg C m−3)PCASP Volume (μm3 cm−3)PCASP (Number per cm3)DMA Volume (μm3 cm−3)DMA (Number per cm3)Alt (m)T (°C)RH (%)Wind Speed (m s−1)Wind Direction (deg)
  • a

    DMA data are reported since PCASP data are not available from Flights 2, 4, and 6.

112:200.41 (0.12)3.66 (1.38)952 (227)2.51 (0.39)8031 (941)1036 (158)20.8 (1.8)23.9 (2.4)5.5 (1.8)256 (17)
212:300.94 (0.14)  3.33 (0.73)6942 (2019)992 (156)19.2 (1.6)36.3 (3.1)7.5 (2.3)252 (14)
214:301.21 (0.17)  4.19 (0.46)7345 (961)976 (139)21.0 (1.5)30.6 (2.6)8.2 (1.9)261 (14)
31:301.46 (0.15)8.19 (2.04)1367 (125)4.31 (0.60)5063 (650)985 (149)17.6 (1.7)41.2 (5.7)6.9 (2.4)256 (14)
33:101.15 (0.13)8.23 (2.70)1443 (181)4.72 (1.49)6469 (99)1114 (23)18.3 (0.3)40.6 (4.6)7.4 (1.9)264 (12)
412:300.37 (0.03)1.54 (1.04)269 (39)1.34 (0.46)2480 (130)1065 (24)21.1 (0.2)11.4 (0.6)7.1 (1.2)94 (13)
42:200.50 (0.05)  1.49 (0.30)7720 (1439)1068 (36)22.8 (0.3)14.3 (1.3)2.8 (1.6)217 (79)
62:200.41 (0.07)  3.27 (1.83)6029 (1194)1102 (69)17.6 (0.8)25.7 (2.5)5.6 (1.5)258 (24)
71:300.48 (0.19)4.48 (2.70)1037 (393)4.38 (2.97)4967 (1341)1088 (49)19.3 (0.8)25.3 (3.5)5.1 (2.3)177(79)
132:402.12 (0.14)15.11 (2.83)2437 (213)9.38 (1.86)5416 (352)1170 (19)17.2 (0.3)54.5 (1.8)8.7 (2.6)264 (16)
162:400.89 (0.08)6.35 (2.04)1604 (385)4.38 (0.31)5186 (396)1058 (81)16.0 (1.0)39.2 (3.1)7.3 (1.9)267 (14)

[10] Ground-based gas (CO, O3) and aerosol (PM2.5) measurements were obtained from existing monitoring stations throughout the Los Angeles Basin and outflow areas (see Figure 1) (http://www.arb.ca.gov/aqmis2/aqmis2.php; CARB IADAM Air Quality Data Statistics, 2010, http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam). Additional hourly meteorological data were obtained from regional surface sites using the Mesowest Database [http://mesowest.utah.edu/index.html]. Solar radiation data were obtained from a ground site at Tonner Canyon (33.948°N, −117.822°W, ∼410 m altitude; Mesowest), which is centrally located within the Basin.

image

Figure 1. Terrain map of the Los Angeles Basin and outflow regions including Banning Pass, which funnels air out toward areas including Indio and the Salton Sea, and the Cajon Pass, which transports air toward Victorville and Barstow. Blue markers correspond to ground stations (http://www.arb.ca.gov/aqmis2/aqmis2.php) at which gas and PM2.5 data were obtained. Black arrows correspond to the typical wind directions during the durations of the flights; specific monthly averaged wind roses across the study region are shown in auxiliary material Figure S1.

Download figure to PowerPoint

3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

[11] The metropolitan Los Angeles population exceeds 17 million and the Basin contains a complete spectrum of air pollution sources, including vehicular emissions, cooking, biomass burning, industrial activity, agricultural activity, and marine shipping. The Los Angeles Basin is bordered on three sides by mountainous terrain and by the Pacific Ocean on the southwestern side (Figure 1). Transport of pollutants in the Los Angeles Basin is governed largely by sea breeze and mountain flows [Lu and Turco, 1995]. Average monthly wind roses are shown in auxiliary material Figure S1 for the month of May across the study region and representative wind directions are shown in Figure 1. The general wind pattern in the region during the period of time that flights occurred was as follows: westerly and southwesterly winds transporting air from the western edge of the Basin toward the eastern edge, where air is funneled out of narrow passes into desert regions. The two main passes are to the north through the Cajon Pass toward Victorville and Barstow and to the east via the Banning Pass.

[12] During CalNex, fine particle number concentrations were typically highest (>10,000 cm−3) at the western side of the Los Angeles Basin (longitude: 118.05°W–118.3°W), especially in the Long Beach area owing to major point sources. Fine particle number concentrations generally decreased as a function of distance eastward, while PCASP particle number and volume concentrations exhibited the opposite behavior and typically reached peak levels near the northern and eastern edges of the Basin. This can be explained by aging processes along the typical sea breeze trajectory leading to the growth of particles into the size range of the PCASP (Dp > 100 nm).

4. WSOC Distributions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

4.1. Spatial WSOC Distribution

[13] Figure 2 shows the cumulative spatial distribution of WSOC concentration measured on the Twin Otter during May 2010. Average levels in specific portions of the region are shown in Figure 3a. WSOC was fairly well-correlated with particle number concentration (r2 = 0.49; slope = 0.85 ng C m−3/cm−3; n = 34655) and volume concentration (r2 = 0.53; slope = 0.12 μg C m−3/(μm3 cm−3); n = 33975), as measured by the PCASP. The highest WSOC concentrations were consistently observed in the Los Angeles Basin, as compared to desert outflow regions and the San Joaquin Valley, reaching values as high as 5.3 μg C m−3. High concentrations were often observed along the north-south corridor extending between Pasadena and the downtown Los Angeles area, coincident with the highest levels of BC, CO, and m/z 57 (>0.3 μg m−3, >0.35 ppmv, >80 ng m−3, respectively). Comparable or higher concentrations were also observed during some flights on the eastern side of the Basin near San Bernardino and Redlands. The lowest concentrations of WSOC in the Los Angeles Basin were usually observed near Torrance when the dominant wind direction was westerly from the ocean (i.e., upwind of major emissions sources in Long Beach), and to the southeast/east of the Puente and Chino Hills, which serve as a barrier to the transport of pollution from the western side of the Basin. Outflow regions were characterized by lower WSOC levels than those observed in the Basin mainly owing to dilution during urban plume transport and a lack of significant WSOC sources in the desert. The general west-to-east transect of highest WSOC levels coincided with the average westerly/southwesterly wind patterns during the period of flights, with increases from the western side of the Basin near downtown Los Angeles toward maximum levels near Whittier, then decreasing to the northeast near San Bernardino. Smoke plumes were occasionally intercepted in the Los Angeles Basin, usually near the eastern side in the vicinity of Riverside, owing to small-scale fires. These plumes resulted in the highest WSOC concentrations during the respective flights, with one being the highest of the campaign (maximum levels observed in separate fire plumes: 1.7 μg C m−3, Flight 6; 5.3 μg C m−3, Flight 8; 1.8 μg C m−3, Flight 12; 1.6 μg C m−3, Flight 18). Chemical ratios that can be used to trace secondary production (e.g., WSOC:CO; WSOC:BC) become perturbed in these cases owing to primary production (i.e., direct emission) of WSOC in these fresh plumes.

image

Figure 2. (left) Spatial distribution of WSOC concentrations during the CalNex campaign in the San Joaquin Valley, the Los Angeles Basin, and outflow regions extending north through the Cajon Pass and east through the Banning Pass toward Indio and the Salton Sea. (right) Close-up of WSOC in the Los Angeles Basin.

Download figure to PowerPoint

image

Figure 3. Cumulative spatial averages of (a) WSOC, (b) surface O3 concentration, (c) WSOC:BC, (d) WSOC:PCASP volume concentration, (e) WSOC:nitrate, (f) WSOC:sulfate, (g) WSOC:organic, and (h) ambient temperature and RH. Numbers in boxes correspond to true values that exceed the range shown in color bars. Sizes of the boxes correspond to the geographic area within which the data were averaged. City labels are included in Figure 3a.

Download figure to PowerPoint

[14] A number of flights focused on Banning Pass, owing to the role of this area as an exit for the Basin pollution. Table 2 shows a summary of all the WSOC measurements in this area with relevant meteorological information. Out of eleven flight legs through this outflow-pass, nine were characterized by westerly winds and higher WSOC levels than periods with easterly winds. For example, during Flight 4 the first transect was characterized by easterly winds and lower concentrations of WSOC and particle concentration. Approximately two hours later, winds shifted to be westerly resulting in enhancements in WSOC (0.37 to 0.50 μg C m−3) and fine particle number concentration (2480 to 7720 cm−3). Of the other parameters shown in Table 2, WSOC was best correlated with RH and PCASP particle volume concentration (r2 = 0.79 for both).

4.2. Vertical WSOC Distribution

[15] The airborne measurements were usually conducted below an altitude of 1 km in the Los Angeles Basin and San Joaquin Valley and at higher altitudes through the outflow-passes (Figure 4a). On 11 of the 16 flights, WSOC exhibited its highest concentration above 500 m, usually near the eastern end of the Basin by Riverside, San Bernardino, and Banning Pass. Two representative flights demonstrating this behavior are shown in Figures 4b and 4c, where WSOC peaks between 600 and 1100 m in altitude near Banning Pass and Riverside. The maximum concentration during Flight 8 (5.3 μg C m−3, 14 May 2010) corresponded to a Riverside fire plume and was the highest Twin Otter WSOC measurement of the entire CalNex field study. A cluster of points in Figure 4a (color-coded as blue and yellow-orange) are relatively lower in WSOC concentration than the rest below 1 km as they are from the San Joaquin Valley and outflow areas.

image

Figure 4. (a) Vertical profile of WSOC mass concentrations during 16 flights over the spatial domain shown in Figure 1. The majority of the data collected below 1 km are from the Los Angeles Basin, with the minority of the yellow-red and blue markers corresponding to San Joaquin Valley and outflow areas to the east of the Basin, respectively. The majority of the markers near 1 km correspond to transits through outflow-passes (i.e., Banning Pass and Cajon Pass), while higher altitudes correspond to transits north of the Los Angeles Basin. (b and c) Examples of vertical profiles during two flights in the Los Angeles Basin showing that the highest WSOC levels were observed above the first few hundred meters. The maximum WSOC level during Flight 8 corresponded to a local fire plume, while the peak WSOC level in Flight 13 was observed over the eastern edge of the Basin near Banning Pass.

Download figure to PowerPoint

[16] Multiple pollution layers have been observed aloft in this region in past airborne measurements [Blumenthal et al., 1978; McElroy and Smith, 1986; Collins et al., 2000]. These layers arise by horizontal and vertical displacement of the morning inversion layer and orographic uplift [Lu and Turco, 1995]. It is possible that such layers, which can undergo continued chemical processing while separated from the mixing layer, contribute to surface concentrations through turbulent mixing as the boundary layer deepens [Husar et al., 1977; Blumenthal et al., 1978]. Vertical profiles of WSOC were obtained during two flights up to an altitude of approximately 3.2 km (Figure 5). The ascents and descents occurred at the northern edge of the Basin. These profiles offer a direct comparison of WSOC separated by 2–4 h of aging time. The ascents out of Los Angeles at the beginning of the flights (Figures 5a and 5c) were characterized by a decrease in WSOC with altitude until a point where a series of vertical layers became evident with enhanced WSOC levels and PCASP particle number concentrations. The descents into the Basin (Figures 5b and 5d) more than two hours later exhibited systematically larger WSOC and PCASP number concentrations in the bottom 1.5 km above the surface with similar layers of WSOC enrichment at higher altitudes. This is likely due to continuous emissions during the daytime and higher photochemical activity occurring to generate more WSOC.

image

Figure 5. Vertical profiles of WSOC during two flights: (a and b) Flight 10 on 18 May 2010 and (c and d) Flight 12 on 20 May 2010. Colored markers correspond to WSOC and dashed black lines represent ambient temperature. Local time = UTC – seven hours.

Download figure to PowerPoint

[17] To identify the level of vertical WSOC variation in the mixing layer, simultaneous ground and airborne measurements in the same vertical column are compared at Pasadena (Figure 6a) and Riverside (Figure 6b). A total of 13 and 12 simultaneous measurements were conducted in Pasadena and Riverside, respectively, between 11:00–15:30 (LT). The airborne measurements during the overpasses were conducted within the mixing layer at altitudes between 500–800 m. At both sites, WSOC levels were generally higher aloft, and the difference is more evident in Pasadena. The greatest enhancements aloft relative to ground measurements at both sites were coincident with the highest ratios of RH aloft relative to at the surface, which is most evident at Riverside. The average RHs during the overpasses at Pasadena and Riverside were 67 ± 10% (max = 78%) and 52 ± 9% (max = 65%), respectively. This may be indicative of production of WSOC by processes that are more efficient as a function of increasing aerosol-phase water. High RHs (>70%) have been shown to coincide with enhanced particulate WSOC and organic acid concentrations owing to more effective partitioning of these species to the aerosol phase and multiphase chemistry [e.g., Hennigan et al., 2008b, 2009; Ervens and Volkamer, 2010, Sorooshian et al., 2010]. In addition, direct photolytic processing has also been suggested to be an important mechanism to generate SOA in particles residing in humid air [Bateman et al., 2011].

image

Figure 6. Comparison of simultaneous ground and airborne WSOC measurements in the same vertical column at (a) Pasadena and (b) Riverside.

Download figure to PowerPoint

[18] Vertical profiles of ratios of WSOC to PCASP particle volume concentration and AMS organic mass are shown in Figure 7. The range of the average WSOC:particle volume concentration ratio (Figure 7a) was between 0.11 and 0.19 between the surface and 3.2 km, while the WSOC:organic ratio (Figure 7b) ranged widely between 0.26 and 0.63. Both ratios exhibit variable behavior as a function of altitude, with an average reduction from the surface to ∼800 m, and with maximum values occurring at altitudes exceeding 1500 m. The large variability in these ratios is largely a result of day-to-day variability; however, the absolute range of the ratios is indicative of WSOC being a significant component of the aerosol from the surface up to 3.2 km.

image

Figure 7. Vertical distribution of (a) the ratio of WSOC to PCASP particle volume concentration (data from all flights) and (b) the ratio of WSOC to total AMS non-refractory organic aerosol mass (Flight 11, 13, 16–18). Numbers beside each point in each panel correspond to the sample size.

Download figure to PowerPoint

4.3. WSOC Ratios to Other Aerosol Mass and Volume Measurements

[19] To gain more insight into the relative importance of WSOC to the total aerosol budget and the sources and sinks of WSOC, the ratios of WSOC to other aerosol parameters are examined in Figures 3 and 8. Despite the existence of vertical gradients in aerosol composition and mass, it is useful to constrain airborne-measured WSOC with simultaneous ground-based PM2.5 measurements (PM2.5 was not quantified on the Twin Otter). For the limited sites at which PM2.5 measurements were available within the Basin, WSOC contributed typically between 6 and 11% to PM2.5 mass. Note that converting WSOC to an organic mass equivalent concentration requires a conversion factor, which was previously assumed to be ∼1.8 for the region [Docherty et al., 2008]. The ratio of WSOC to PM2.5 was highest in the western portion of the Los Angeles Basin near Long Beach, downtown Los Angeles, and Glendora (0.10–0.11) and was lowest near Banning Pass (∼0.06) owing partly to the major enhancement in ammonium nitrate levels near the eastern side of the Basin. The closest measure of how WSOC contributes to total PM2.5 using aircraft measurements is the comparison to PCASP volume concentration, where the PCASP measures particles in a similar size range as the PILS-TOC (<2.5 μm). The WSOC:PCASP volume ratio (Figure 3d) was typically between ∼0.1–0.15 μg C m−3/(μm3 cm−3) in the Los Angeles Basin, while higher average values were observed in the outflow regions. Ratios reached an average of 0.30 ± 0.14 near the Salton Sea to the east of the Basin and 0.21 ± 0.12 near Barstow to the northeast of the Basin. As a basis for comparison, the ratio of WSOC to fine particle volume concentration was 0.12 and 0.10–0.22 μg C m−3/(μm3 cm−3) in non-biomass and biomass burning plumes, respectively, in the northeastern United States [Sullivan et al., 2006; Peltier et al., 2007b]. An increase in this ratio can be due to a variety of reasons including losses in other aerosol components (e.g., nitrate volatilization), increased production of WSOC during transport, local sources such as fires, or entrained air masses from aloft that are enriched with WSOC relative to other aerosol components.

image

Figure 8. Ratio of m/z 44:WSOC as a function of m/z 44:43. Markers are color-coded with longitude where red corresponds to western side of the Los Angeles Basin and purple corresponds to outflow desert regions to the east of the Basin.

Download figure to PowerPoint

[20] Examining the variation of relative concentrations of WSOC and other particle and gas-phase constituents along the sea breeze trajectory from west to east provides insight into the relative importance of volatilization and secondary formation of WSOC (Figure 3). The highest O3 levels were observed farther inland and were highest in the outflows to the east of the Basin (Figure 3b). This is indicative of increased photochemical processing during sea breeze transport of air masses from the coast to the desert. This would likewise favor secondary production of WSOC. Black carbon is a primary species and thus an increase in the WSOC:BC ratio is a tracer for secondary production. This ratio was highest near the southwestern portion of the study region, presumably owing to the low levels of BC in marine air and upwind of major BC sources in the Basin (Figure 3c). This ratio did not show any clear trend as a function of downwind distance, likely a result of the abundance of BC and organic aerosol sources in the Basin, including the fires observed on the eastern side of the Basin. Unlike the majority of the Basin, there are fewer BC sources along trajectories to the east of the outflow channels; WSOC:BC initially decreases and then increases owing possibly to a combination of WSOC volatilization initially and secondary production afterwards.

[21] The contribution of WSOC to total non-refractory organic mass was highest near the southwestern portion of the Los Angeles Basin (up to ∼60% just north of Santa Ana) and lowest in the desert outflow regions (<40%) (Figure 3g). Along the sea breeze trajectory on the northern side of the Basin, the WSOC:Organic ratio tended to increase toward Banning Pass reaching an average value of 53 ± 34%. Recent studies have utilized m/z 44 and m/z 43 [e.g., Ng et al., 2010] to track the aging of organic aerosol in the atmosphere. The ratio of m/z 44:43 provides information about the chemical functionality of oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA), with higher values indicative of a higher state of oxidation. Wonaschütz et al. [2011] examined the ratio of m/z 44:WSOC as a function of m/z 44:43 during the PACO campaign as a way of understanding how the composition of the WSOC fraction of the aerosol changed with photochemical age. Aircraft measurements in Figure 8 show that the ratio of m/z 44:WSOC increased as a function of m/z 44:43, with increases in both ratios as a function of longitude (higher values to the east). This is consistent with a shift from semi-volatile OOA components to more low-volatility OOA components as a function of photochemical aging. The immediate sharp increase in m/z 44:WSOC followed by a plateau is consistent with the findings of Ng et al. [2010] and previous measurements during PACO [Wonaschütz et al., 2011]. It is noted that m/z 44 levels reached as high as ∼1.8 μg m−3, which is roughly similar to peak levels observed in Pittsburgh during September (up to ∼1.2 μg m−3 [Zhang et al., 2005]), Tokyo in August (up to ∼2.29 μg m−3 [Takegawa et al., 2007]), but less than that in Tokyo during the summer (up to ∼3.5 μg m−3) [Kondo et al., 2007].

[22] More insight into the secondary production of organics arises from the ratio of WSOC:SO42− (Figure 3f) as a function of distance eastward from the western end of the Basin where the highest SO42− levels were observed, owing to marine shipping sources and other major point sources near the coast. The WSOC:SO42− ratio ranged between 0.9 and 5.0 in the study region, which is greater than the cumulative average ratio (∼0.55) observed by Peltier et al. [2007b] in the northeastern United States. The peak WSOC:SO42− ratios between Riverside and Banning are coincident with an area with intense ammonium nitrate production owing largely to the influence of agricultural activity as a source of NH3, including animal husbandry operations. Ammonium nitrate production results in enhanced aerosol hygroscopicity and aerosol-phase water, which would promote more partitioning of WSOC to the aerosol phase and both multiphase chemistry and photolytic processing to produce WSOC [Hennigan et al., 2008a; Ervens and Volkamer, 2010; Sorooshian et al., 2010; Bateman et al., 2011]. In addition, WSOC may have been produced in the emissions from the agricultural activity. The WSOC:SO42− ratio decreased immediately downwind of Banning by an average factor of nearly 2.5 and this may be due to volatilization of WSOC (note that SO42− is not volatile), which is consistent with the reduction in the WSOC:BC ratio (by an average factor of ∼2) in the same area. Production of SO42− in this area can likely be ruled out owing to the low RHs, high temperatures, and lack of aqueous-phase chemistry to produce SO42− during afternoons (Table 2). The average RH during traverses through Banning Pass ranged between 11 and 55%.

[23] Reductions in aerosol-phase water, such as what happens when air is advected from the Basin to the desert outflows, promotes re-partitioning of WSOC to the gas phase [Hennigan et al., 2008b; 2009]. Lower amounts of the aerosol-phase water are associated with reduced RH and aerosol hygroscopicity. As shown in Figure 3h, the average temperature generally increases from west to east, and vice versa for average RH. The sub-saturated hygroscopicity of the regional aerosol decreased in the outflows, largely owing to ammonium nitrate volatilization. The average hygroscopic growth factor (Dp,wet/Dp,dry) at an RH of 92% for fine aerosol was 1.72 ± 0.25 in the Basin and 1.57 ± 0.19 in the desert outflows. To further examine the likelihood that volatilization is a sink for WSOC downwind of the Los Angeles Basin, the ratio of WSOC:NO3 is also examined (Figure 3e), as NO3- is vulnerable to evaporation. The range of this ratio was 0.2–2.3, within which are values observed in Mexico City (∼0.2–1.0) [Hennigan et al., 2008a] but much less than the cumulative average ratio (>30) observed in the northeastern United States [Peltier et al., 2007b]. AMS NO3 mass concentrations are typically highest at San Bernardino (6.08 ± 5.87 μg m−3 for the box labeled with this city in Figure 3) and they decrease significantly immediately downwind of the outflow-passes. As a result, the WSOC:NO3 ratio increased sharply in the outflows (greater than a factor of six), in contrast to the WSOC:SO42− ratio. This indicates that WSOC is less sensitive to volatilization as compared to ammonium nitrate. Such results are consistent with observations in Mexico City [Hennigan et al., 2008a].

[24] The general picture drawn in Figure 3 involves the following: (i) the western Basin is an important anthropogenic source for WSOC and precursors; and (ii) pollutants are transported to the eastern side of the Basin and through outflow-passes with the sea breeze, with aerosol aging processes during this time including dilution, secondary formation of WSOC, and volatilization of some fraction of WSOC. The increasing temperatures (decreasing RH) and reduction of aerosol hygroscopicity and aerosol-phase water in the outflows is likely responsible for the loss of some WSOC mass.

5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

5.1. Basin Loops

[25] Two weekdays characterized by different meteorological conditions and nearly identical flight paths in the Los Angeles Basin are examined to study the sensitivity of the spatiotemporal distribution of WSOC to meteorology (Figure 9). Flight 5 on 10 May 2010 was characterized by higher wind speeds, higher ambient temperature, and lower incident solar radiation as compared to Flight 8 on 14 May 2010 during the duration of the flights (Table 3). Flight 5 was characterized by cloudy conditions in the Basin during the time span of the flight, unlike Flight 8. The aircraft flew at an altitude of approximately ∼300–600 m both flights. There was no significant difference in wind patterns between these two days. Fine particle concentrations were on average similar, but PCASP particle number concentrations were almost twice as large during Flight 8, indicative of more abundant larger particles.

image

Figure 9. Spatial maps of WSOC during three successive Basin loops in Flight 5 on 10 May 2010 ((a) UTC = 19:00–20:30, (b) 20:30–21:50, and (c) 21:50–23:00) and in Flight 8 on 14 May 2010 ((d) UTC = 18:00–19:30, (e) 19:30–20:50, and (f) 20:50–22:00). Black arrows in Figures 10a and 10d correspond to the typical wind directions during the duration of the two flights as determined by wind roses obtained from the Mesowest Database [http://mesowest.utah.edu/index.html]. Local time = UTC − seven hours.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Table 3. Average Values of Meteorological and Aerosol Parameters During Los Angeles Basin Loops During Five Flightsa
 UTC TimeT (°C)RH (%)Wind (m s−1)CPC (Number per cm3)PCASP (Number per cm3)WSOC (μg C m−3)O3 (ppb)WSOC:BC (μg C m−3/μg m−3)Solar Radiation (W m−2)
  • a

    Refer to Figures 9 and 10. Numbers in parentheses represent standard deviations.

Flight 5Loop 1 (19:00–20:30)13.3 (1.1)62.5 (6.5)4.8 (1.8)9583 (4649)754 (312)0.72 (0.19)52.3 (8.4)5.6 (0.8)896 (173)
 Loop 2 (20:30–21:50)13.7 (1.1)61.2 (5.7)5.8 (1.5)11025 (4466)774 (393)0.66 (0.28)53.7 (9.7)6.2 (1.8)816 (71)
 Loop 3 (21:50–23:00)13.8 (1.0)60.3 (6.1)6.3 (1.8)10747 (4386)642 (354)0.67 (0.25)53.9 (9.6)8.8 (5.4)728 (185)
           
Flight 8Loop 1 (18:00–19:30)14.8 (0.5)70.4 (3.0)2.6 (1.0)9664 (2517)1372 (264)1.33 (0.12)50.8 (11.9)5.0 (1.1)1066 (40)
 Loop 2 (19:30–20:50)16.7 (0.7)62.8 (4.6)3.3 (1.0)12299 (3574)1575 (294)1.57 (0.27)53.3 (11.6)4.5 (2.4)1064 (43)
 Loop 3 (20:50–22:00)17.7 (1.26)60.8 (6.4)3.8 (1.0)14723 (3514)1641 (301)1.75 (0.15)55.8 (11.8)6.9 (3.9)985 (85)
           
Flight 9Loop 1 (18:20–20:05)18.1 (2.7)61.2 (14.5)3.2 (1.5)9953 (3706)1751 (422)2.61 (0.55)61.1 (12.2)9.6 (1.9)1083 (41)
 Loop 2 (20:05–22:15)20.2 (3.3)53.2 (17.1)5.0 (1.9)11635 (4155)1654 (436)2.89 (0.68)72.4 (10.1)10.2 (4.3)1003 (112)
           
Flight 11Loop 1 (18:50–21:05)17.2 (1.9)65.6 (10.2)3.4 (1.5)10328 (3665)1580 (1987)2.11 (0.33)46.8 (12.8)6.4 (1.6)1087 (32)
 Loop 2 (21:05–22:50)18.4 (2.5)63.2 (11.2)5.3 (2.0)13331 (4383)1521 (401)2.23 (0.34)53.3 (11.6)8.1 (3.3)999 (114)
           
Flight 13Loop 1 (18:10–20:25)14.4 (2.0)65.0 (22.1)5.0 (3.2)6815 (2501)1460 (654)1.41 (0.53)56.4 (10.5)4.7 (1.0)829 (372)
 Loop 2 (20:25–22:10)17.7 (1.8)60.0 (8.8)4.8 (2.1)10671 (4535)1644 (556)2.27 (0.43)62.0 (11.3)6.4 (3.2)1004 (98)

[26] During Flight 5, three identical loops were carried out as shown in Figures 9a9c: first loop (19:00–20:30, UTC), second loop (20:30–21:50), and third loop (21:50–23:00). When the sea breeze started to develop around 18:00 UTC, wind speeds gradually increased up to >10 m s−1 and changed direction to westerly/southwesterly, resulting in the usual transport from west to east. In the southwestern portion of the Basin, WSOC concentrations were highest during the first loop, presumably owing to the influence of residual aged aerosol from the previous day and anthropogenic emissions near Long Beach. In the first loop, the highest WSOC and PCASP particle number concentrations were observed along the north-south axis between Pasadena and downtown Los Angeles. As a result of the westerly/southwesterly flow later during the day, the highest WSOC levels occurred at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains at the northern edge of the Basin. The southern half of the Basin loops extending from Fullerton/Anaheim to San Bernardino were characterized by significantly lower WSOC levels during all three loops, most likely a result of the Basin topography (i.e., Puente and Chino Hills). The data from Flight 5 indicate that the significant factors governing WSOC levels were likely residual aerosol in the Basin from the previous day, pollution near the western edge of the Basin, and the prevailing west-to-east winds with potential production during the transport. These data do not allow one to discern a clear connection between WSOC measurements and the influence of boundary layer deepening and potential entrainment of aerosol aloft.

[27] Flight 8 was conducted almost identically to Flight 5, as shown in Figures 9d9f. In contrast to Flight 5, the aerosol number concentrations and WSOC increased with each successive loop during Flight 8 (similar to ambient temperature and O3). The spatial WSOC distribution during the first loop was similar to that of Flight 5, both of which were likely influenced by residual pollutants from the previous day and sources near the western side of the Basin. WSOC increased significantly in concentration over the western side of the Basin during the second and third loops. Unlike Flight 5, the entire north-south axis between Pasadena and downtown Los Angeles exhibited high WSOC levels later in the day owing likely to a combination of secondary WSOC production and lower wind speeds. The third loop of Flight 8 was characterized by systematically higher WSOC levels across the entire Basin. WSOC levels were especially high between Ontario and Riverside owing to a fire that began immediately prior to the third loop.

[28] The data from both flights indicate that, with higher incident solar radiation and relatively low wind speeds, it is likely that secondary production mechanisms contribute to sustained levels of WSOC throughout the daytime periods (especially in Flight 8) even though the mixing layer progressively deepened. While entrainment of polluted air aloft may have contributed to WSOC levels during these flights, this process was not a dominant influence on WSOC in the mixing layer as there were large spatial differences in WSOC across the Basin that are largely controlled by transport and topography.

5.2. Basin North-South Transects

[29] To examine the spatial gradients of WSOC within the regions outlined by the loops in Figure 9, a series of north-south zig zag patterns were flown within the Los Angeles Basin. The paths during Flights 9, 11, and 13 are shown in Figure 10. The flights were conducted approximately during the same time on different days at a similar altitude (∼300–700 m). Flight 9 was conducted on a Saturday, whereas the other two are from weekdays (Table 1). Meteorological conditions were relatively similar on these three days (Table 3), with the exception of reduced temperature and incident solar radiation values during the early part of Flight 13 due to cloudy conditions. Particle number concentrations were similar during these flights. WSOC concentrations were enhanced during the second loops, coincident with higher O3 concentrations, ambient temperatures, and WSOC:BC ratios than the first loop within each flight. This is most evident during Flight 13 presumably due to the shift from cloudy to clear conditions (and increase in incident solar radiation) between the two loops. The absolute increases in WSOC later in the daytime most likely were influenced by secondary production.

image

Figure 10. Spatial maps of WSOC during Flights (a) 9 (15 May 2010), (b) 11 (19 May 2010), and (c) 13 (21 May 2010) with black arrows in Figure 10a corresponding to the typical wind directions during the duration of all three flights as determined by wind roses obtained from the Mesowest Database [http://mesowest.utah.edu/index.html]. Local time = UTC - seven hours.

Download figure to PowerPoint

[30] These three flights demonstrate the influence of the Basin topography on WSOC levels. The Puente and Chino Hills extending from Whittier to the east create a gradient of low WSOC from south of these hills to higher levels on the north side. Sea breeze winds (westerly/southwesterly) near the coast transport air enriched with WSOC to the north side of these hills, which then gets redistributed across a larger area on the eastern end of the Basin extending from San Bernardino down south to Riverside. In addition to the transport of existing WSOC, there is likely production of these species over inland areas that are characterized by enhanced O3 concentrations (Figure 3b).

6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

[31] Figure 11 shows a conceptual model of the mechanisms describing the sources, transformation, and fate of WSOC during CalNex. Industrial and marine sources of pollution near the western side of the Basin result in enhanced levels of sulfate and carbonaceous components including WSOC. As aerosol is advected with the sea breeze from the west to the east through the outflows, the overall aerosol composition changes owing to numerous point sources, increasing (decreasing) temperature (RH), amount of aerosol-phase water, and secondary formation processes. For example, VOC emissions lead to SOA formation and primary emissions from episodic fires significantly lead to enhanced levels in organics, especially WSOC. The components comprising WSOC become increasingly oxidized as a function of photochemical age from west-to-east. Near the eastern half of the Basin, NH3 emissions contribute to significant ammonium nitrate formation, leading to more hygroscopic aerosol and increased aerosol-phase water depending on the ambient RH. A number of processes can lead to higher levels of particulate WSOC with increasing aerosol-phase water: partitioning of WSOC to the aerosol phase [Hennigan et al., 2008b, 2009], multiphase chemistry [Ervens and Volkamer, 2010; Sorooshian et al., 2010], and photolytic processing [Bateman et al., 2011]. As aerosol is transported through the outflows to desert regions, the enhanced temperatures and reduced RH result in NO3 evaporation and consequently, reductions in aerosol-phase water. This may promote re-partitioning of WSOC to the gas phase while suppressing humidity-dependent processes that increase particulate WSOC levels.

image

Figure 11. Conceptual model of WSOC in the Los Angeles Basin and desert outflows. The x axis represents longitude and extends from the coast to the desert outflows to the east of the Los Angeles Basin.

Download figure to PowerPoint

7. Conclusions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

[32] During the May 2010 deployment of the CIRPAS Twin Otter in the CalNex field study, a PILS-TOC instrument was employed to rapidly quantify particulate water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) during 16 flights covering the Los Angeles Basin, outflow regions, and the San Joaquin Valley. The WSOC measurements were focused on building a spatial map of concentrations across this region in the lateral and vertical directions, on constraining the contribution of these species to the overall aerosol mass budget, and on examining the nature and evolution of this important class of organics due to the prevailing meteorology and daytime air transport patterns.

[33] The highest absolute WSOC concentrations were observed in the Basin (up to 5.3 μg C m−3) and the lowest WSOC levels were in the San Joaquin Valley and in Basin outflow regions owing to plume dilution. The highest WSOC levels during individual flights and for the entire campaign occurred in biomass burning plumes from small-scale fires on the eastern side of the Basin. WSOC contributes approximately 6–11% by mass to PM2.5 within the Basin. WSOC was highest relative to both PM2.5 near the western Basin sites of Torrance and Long Beach, likely owing to these sites being upwind of major pollution sources and influenced by aged marine aerosol and residual pollutants from the previous day. WSOC levels were typically higher above 500 m in the study region, and layers of enhanced WSOC were identified aloft up to an altitude of 3.2 km. The ratio of WSOC to PCASP particle volume concentration and organic non-refractory mass ranged between 0.11–0.19 and 0.26–0.63, respectively, between the surface and 3.2 km.

[34] Simultaneous ground-based measurements of WSOC during aircraft overpasses in Riverside and Pasadena indicate that higher levels occur more frequently aloft within the mixing layer. This was most evident when the ratio of RH measured on the aircraft versus the surface was also higher, suggestive of an important role for processes that increase particulate WSOC levels as a function of increasing aerosol-phase water such as more efficient partitioning to the aerosol phase. Furthermore, WSOC was highly correlated with RH within the Banning Pass area where pollution is funneled out of the Basin to the east. Since aerosol hygroscopicity and ambient RH generally decreased from the Basin to the eastern desert outflows, there was a reduction in aerosol-phase water that likely influenced WSOC levels; WSOC levels dropped more relative to both BC and SO42−, both of which are non-volatile, downwind of the outflows indicative of partitioning of WSOC to the gas phase and suppression of multiphase processes (i.e., partitioning of WSOC to the aerosol phase, multiphase chemistry, photolytic processing) to produce these species. However, WSOC increased relative to NO3, suggesting that although both have a semi-volatile character, NO3 was more volatile. Farther downwind in the deserts (e.g., near Salton Sea), WSOC begins to increase relative to BC indicative of secondary production, especially as O3 levels were enhanced in these areas.

[35] The contribution of acid-like oxygenated organics (m/z 44) to WSOC increases from west to east as a result of photochemical aging. Comparisons of nearly identical flight paths on different days show that with higher incident solar radiation and relatively low wind speeds, secondary production mechanisms more clearly contribute to sustained levels of WSOC throughout the daytime periods even though the mixing layer progressively deepens. Entrainment of air aloft may have contributed to WSOC levels within the mixing layer; however, this process was not the key regulator of WSOC in the mixing layer as there were large spatial differences in WSOC across the Basin that are largely controlled by sea breeze transport, topography, secondary production during transport, and presence of fires.

[36] This work adds to the inventory of WSOC data in major mega-cities such as Beijing [Feng et al., 2006], New Delhi [Miyazaki et al., 2009], and Mexico City [Hennigan et al., 2008a] showing that WSOC contributes significantly to urban aerosol mass concentrations. The aircraft measurements in CalNex highlight the importance of considering the vertical structure of WSOC in the atmosphere. Surface measurements of WSOC are shown to not be entirely representative of the radiative impact of this class of species. This work also emphasizes the importance of considering spatial gradients in aerosol-phase water. For example, the Los Angeles Basin and outflow regions exhibit large variations in RH and have a variety of sources including shipping and agricultural emissions that can create gradients in aerosol hygroscopicity. The resulting spatial variations in aerosol-phase water influence WSOC levels via production processes with efficiencies dependent on this amount of water. Episodic fires and potential volatilization of WSOC point to the use of caution in using ratios of WSOC to other species (e.g., CO and BC) in quantifying the magnitude of SOA production.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Experimental Methods
  5. 3. Los Angeles Basin and Outflow Area Description
  6. 4. WSOC Distributions
  7. 5. Case Studies in the Los Angeles Basin
  8. 6. Conceptual Model of WSOC in the Study Region
  9. 7. Conclusions
  10. Acknowledgments
  11. References
  12. Supporting Information

Auxiliary material for this article contains one figure.

Auxiliary material files may require downloading to a local drive depending on platform, browser, configuration, and size. To open auxiliary materials in a browser, click on the label. To download, Right-click and select “Save Target As…” (PC) or CTRL-click and select “Download Link to Disk” (Mac).

Additional file information is provided in the readme.txt.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
jgrd17594-sup-0001-readme.txtplain text document2Kreadme.txt
jgrd17594-sup-0002-fs01.pdfPDF document4257KFigure S1. Spatial map of average wind roses for numerous sites around the Los Angeles Basin during the CalNex study in May 2010.
jgrd17594-sup-0003-t01.txtplain text document1KTab-delimited Table 1.
jgrd17594-sup-0004-t02.txtplain text document2KTab-delimited Table 2.
jgrd17594-sup-0005-t03.txtplain text document2KTab-delimited Table 3.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.