SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ayers, R. S., and D. W. Westcot (1985), Water Quality for Agriculture, in FAO irrigation and drainage Papers, version 29, 110 pp., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
  • Bateman, I., R. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, E. Özdemiroğlu, D. Pearce, R. Sugden, and J. Swanson (2002), Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques, A Manual, 458 pp., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U. K.
  • Bhat, C. R. (1997), Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models: Econometric structure and application to intercity travel, Transp. Res. B, 31(1), 1121.
  • Chartzoulakis, K. S., N. V. Paranychianakis, and A. N. Angelakis (2001), Water resources management in the island of Crete, Greece, with emphasis on the agricultural use, Water Policy, 3(3), 193205.
  • Commission of European Communities (CEC) (1991), Council Directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban wastewater treatment (91/271/EEC), Off. J. Eur. Communities Legis., L135, 4052.
  • Division of Early Warning and Assessment (DEWA) (2004), Freshwater in Europe, in Hydropolitical Vulnerability and Resilience Along International Waters: Europe, U. N. Environ. Programme, Geneva, Switzerland. [Available at www.unep.ch/product/publication/freshwater_europe/.]
  • Flynn, T. N., J. J. Louviere, T. J. Peters, and J. Coast (2010), Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences for quality of life, variance-scale heterogeneity matters, Soc. Sci. Med., 70(12), 19571965.
  • Genius, M., M. Manioudaki, E. Mokas, E. Pantagakis, D. Tampakakis, and K. P. Tsagarakis (2005), Estimation of willingness to pay for wastewater treatment, Water Sci. Technol., 5(6), 105113.
  • Georgiou, S., and I. J. Bateman (2005), Revision of the EU bathing water directive: Economic costs and benefits, Marine Pollut. Bull., 50(4), 430438.
  • Greene, W. (2007), NLOGIT, Version 4.0, Reference Guide, Econometric Software, N. Y., 500+ pp.
  • Hensher, D. A. (1999), HEV choice models as a search engine for the specification of nested Logit tree structures, Marketing Lett., 10(4), 339349.
  • Hensher, D. A., J. M. Rose, and W. H. Greene (2007), Applied Choice Analysis, A Primer, 717 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
  • Hernández-Sancho, F., M. Molinos-Senante, and R. Sala-Garrido (2010), Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: An empirical approach for Spain, Sci. Total Environ., 408(4), 953957.
  • Hoyos, D. (2010), The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments, Ecological Econ., 69(8), 15951603.
  • Hu, W., A. Hünnemeyer, M. Veeman, W. Adamowicz, and L. Srivastava (2004), Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 31(3), 389408.
  • Hurlimann, A. C. (2007), Is recycled water use risky? An urban Australian community's perspective, Environmentalist, 27(1), 8394.
  • Hurlimann, A., and J. McKay (2007), Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use: An evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, colour and odour using conjoint analysis, J. Environ. Manage., 83(1), 93104.
  • Jin, J., Z. Wang, and S. Ran (2006), Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao, Ecol. Econ., 57(3), 430441.
  • Kontogianni, A., I. H. Langford, A. Papandreou, and M. S. Skourtos (2003), Social preferences for improving water quality: An economic analysis of benefits from wastewater treatment, Water Resour. Manage., 17(5), 317336.
  • Lancaster, K. (1966), A new Approach to consumer theory, J. Political Econ., 74, 132157.
  • Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait (2000), Stated Choice Methods—Analysis and Applications, 5th ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K., 418 pp.
  • Mansilha, C. R., C. A. Coelho, A. M. Heitor, J. Amado, J. P. Martins, and P. Gameiro (2009), Bathing waters: New directive, new standards, new quality approach, Marine Pollut. Bull., 58(10), 15621565.
  • Marks, J. S. (2006), Taking the public seriously: The case of potable and non potable reuse, Desalination, 187(1–3), 137147.
  • Menegaki, A. N., N. Hanley, and K. P. Tsagarakis (2007), The social acceptability and valuation of recycled water in Crete: A study of consumers' and farmers' attitudes, Ecol. Econ., 62(1), 718.
  • Paranychianakis, N. V., and K. S. Chartzoulakis (2005), Irrigation of Mediterranean crops with saline water: From physiology to management practices, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 106(2–3), 171187.
  • Paranychianakis, N. V., A. N. Angelakis, H. Leverenz, and G. Tchobanoglous (2006), Treatment of wastewater with slow rate systems: A review of treatment processes and plant functions, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(3), 187259.
  • Pearce, D. (1998a), Does European Union environmental policy pass a cost-benefit test?, World Econ., 5(3), 115118.
  • Pearce, D. W. (1998b), Environmental appraisal and environmental policy in the European Union, Environ. Resour. Econ., 11(3–4), 489501.
  • Pearce, D. W., and T. Seccombe-Hett (2000), Economic valuation and environmental decision-making in Europe, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34(8), 14191425.
  • Po, M., B. E. Nancarrow, Z. Leviston, N. B. Porter, G. J. Syme, and J. D. Kaercher (2005), Predicting community behaviour in relation to wastewater reuse: What drives decisions to accept or reject?, Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, 113 pp., CSIRO Land and Water, Perth, Australia.
  • Riera, P. (2008), Does the equivalency analysis of the European environmental liability directive pass a social cost-benefit analysis test?, J. For. Econ., 14(4), 225226.
  • Rolfe, J., J. Bennett, and J. Louviere (2002), Stated values and reminders of substitute goods: Testing for framing effects with choice modelling, Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 46(1), 120.
  • Roomratanapun, W. (2001), Introducing centralised wastewater treatment in Bangkok: A study of factors determining its acceptability, Habitat International, 25(3), 359371.
  • Rose, J. M., C. J., Bliemer, D. A., Hensher, and A. T. Collins (2008), Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives, Transp. Res. B, 42, 395406.
  • Scarpa, R., S. Ferrini, and K. G. Willis (2005), Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments, chapt. 13, in Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, edited by R. Scarpa and A. Alberini, pp. 247273, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  • Scarpa, R., K. G. Willis, and M. Acutt (2007), Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments, J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 50(4), 449466.
  • Thurston, L. (1927), A law of comparative judgement, Psychological Rev., 34, 273286.
  • Train, K. E. (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 342 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
  • Tsagarakis, K. P., and N. Georgantzís (2003), The role of information on farmers' willingness to use recycled water for irrigation, Water Sci. Technol., 3(4), 105113.
  • Tsagarakis, K. P., D. D. Mara, and A. N. Angelakis (2001a), Wastewater management in Greece: Experience and lessons for developing countries, Water Sci. Technol., 44(6), 163172.
  • Tsagarakis, K. P., P. Tsoumanis, K. Chartzoulakis, and A. N. Angelakis (2001b), Water resources status including wastewater treatment and reuse in Greece: Related problems and prospectives, Water International, 26(2), 252258.
  • Tsanis, I. K., and M. G. Apostolaki (2009), Estimating groundwater withdrawal in poorly gauged agricultural basins, Water Resour. Manage., 23(6), 10971123.
  • Tzanakakis, V. A., N. V. Paranychianakis, P. A. Londra, and A. N. Angelakis (2011), Effluent application to the land: Changes in soil properties and treatment potential, Ecol. Eng., 37(11), 17571764.
  • Tziakis, I., I. Pachiadakis, M. Moraitakis, K. Xideas, G. Theologis, and K. P. Tsagarakis (2009), Valuing benefits from wastewater treatment and reuse using contingent valuation methodology, Desalination, 237(1–3), 117125.