Assessing the greenhouse impact of natural gas
Article first published online: 19 JUN 2012
©2012. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Volume 13, Issue 6, June 2012
How to Cite
2012), Assessing the greenhouse impact of natural gas, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 13, Q06013, doi:10.1029/2012GC004032.(
- Issue published online: 19 JUN 2012
- Article first published online: 19 JUN 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 14 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 13 APR 2012
- Manuscript Received: 10 JAN 2012
- global warming;
- greenhouse forcing;
- natural gas
 The global warming impact of substituting natural gas for coal and oil is currently in debate. We address this question here by comparing the reduction of greenhouse warming that would result from substituting gas for coal and some oil to the reduction which could be achieved by instead substituting zero carbon energy sources. We show that substitution of natural gas reduces global warming by 40% of that which could be attained by the substitution of zero carbon energy sources. At methane leakage rates that are ∼1% of production, which is similar to today's probable leakage rate of ∼1.5% of production, the 40% benefit is realized as gas substitution occurs. For short transitions the leakage rate must be more than 10 to 15% of production for gas substitution not to reduce warming, and for longer transitions the leakage must be much greater. But even if the leakage was so high that the substitution was not of immediate benefit, the 40%-of-zero-carbon benefit would be realized shortly after methane emissions ceased because methane is removed quickly from the atmosphere whereas CO2 is not. The benefits of substitution are unaffected by heat exchange to the ocean. CO2 emissions are the key to anthropogenic climate change, and substituting gas reduces them by 40% of that possible by conversion to zero carbon energy sources. Gas substitution also reduces the rate at which zero carbon energy sources must eventually be introduced.