Oxygen trends over five decades in the North Atlantic
Article first published online: 3 NOV 2012
DOI: 10.1029/2012JC007909
©2012. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Additional Information
How to Cite
, and (2012), Oxygen trends over five decades in the North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C11004, doi:10.1029/2012JC007909.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 3 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 3 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 12 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 27 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Received: 26 JAN 2012
Keywords:
- North Atlantic;
- climate change;
- deoxygenation;
- heat content;
- oxygen changes;
- water masses
[1] We investigate long-term trends in dissolved oxygen in the North Atlantic from 1960 to 2009 on the basis of a newly assembled high-quality dataset consisting of oxygen data from three different sources: CARINA, GLODAP and the World Ocean Database. Oxygen trends are determined along isopycnal surfaces for eight regions and five water masses using a general least-squares linear regression method that accounts for temporal auto-correlation. Our results show a significant decrease of oxygen in the Upper (UW), Mode (MW) and Intermediate (IW) waters in almost all regions over the last 5 decades. Over the same period, oxygen increased in the Lower Intermediate Water (LIW) and Labrador Sea Water (LSW) throughout the North Atlantic. The observed oxygen decreases in the MW and IW of the northern and eastern regions are largely driven by changes in circulation and/or ventilation, while changes in solubility are the main driver for the oxygen decrease in the UW and the increases in the LIW and LSW. From 1960 until 2009 the UW, MW, and IW horizons have lost a total of −57 ± 34 Tmol, while the LIW and LSW horizons have gained 46 ± 47 Tmol, integrating to a roughly constant oxygen inventory in the North Atlantic. Comparing our oxygen trends with those of the oceanic heat content, we find an O2 to heat change ratio of −3.6 ± 2.8 nmol J−1 for the UW, MW and IW, and a ratio of −2.8 ± 3.4 nmol J−1 for the LIW and LSW. These ratios are substantially larger than those expected from solubility alone.

2169-9291/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=fb2ef91801a55f3e230c37930ee66455258ed94a)
2169-9291/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=e412655ffe60344498caaded2cf02e697f56103d)
2169-9291/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=2f0e39ad70c1a3900b1e11bbeafc7c6f1c8e1fec)