Flux transfer events and reconnection at the magnetopause
Article first published online: 19 OCT 2006
©1991. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
Volume 72, Issue 40, pages 431–434, 1 October 1991
How to Cite
1991), Flux transfer events and reconnection at the magnetopause, Eos Trans. AGU, 72(40), 431–434, doi:10.1029/90EO10315.(
- Issue published online: 19 OCT 2006
- Article first published online: 19 OCT 2006
For the general reader on magnetopause reconnection, it would appear that mixed information is coming from the global and quasi-steady type of large-scale reconnection (LSR) models and from the “patchy” and transient character of models related to flux transfer events (FTEs). I will attempt here to address complementary aspects of both types of models, with the goal of moving toward a unified model of magnetopause reconnection.
Motivated by the Eos article on transient reconnection at the magnetopause by Lockwood et al.  as well as by a previous article on the subject by Lee , both of which serve to summarize a large body of work since the initial papers on FTEs or “flux erosion events” by Russell and Elphic  and Haerendel et al. , I would like to comment on two aspects involving FTEs and LSR [Petschek, 1964; Gonzalez and Mozer, 1974; Vasyliunas, 1975; Forbes and Priest, 1987; Sonnerup, 1984, 1988].