A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic
Article first published online: 14 JUN 2010
Copyright 1993 by the American Geophysical Union.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume 7, Issue 4, pages 879–900, December 1993
How to Cite
1993), A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 7(4), 879–900, doi:10.1029/93GB01731., et al. (
- Issue published online: 14 JUN 2010
- Article first published online: 14 JUN 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 22 JUN 1993
- Manuscript Received: 5 JAN 1993
The biogeochemical properties of an extensive bloom (∼250,000 km2) of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the north east Atlantic Ocean were investigated in June 1991. Satellite (NOAA-AVHRR) imagery showed that the bloom was centered initially at 60°–63°N by 13°–28°W and lasted approximately 3 weeks. Spatial variations in satellite-measured reflectance were well correlated with surface measurements of the beam attenuation coefficient, levels of particulate inorganic carbon, and coccolith density. Rates of both photosynthesis and calcification were typically relatively low within the coccolithophore-rich waters, suggesting the population was in a late stage of development at the time of the field observations. Levels of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) in surface waters were high compared to average ocean values, with the greatest concentrations in localized areas characterized by relatively high rates of photosynthesis, calcification, and grazing by microzooplankton. The estimated spatially averaged flux of DMS to the atmosphere was 1122 nmol m−2 h−1, somewhat greater than that determined for the same region in June-July 1987. Coccolith production (1 × 106 tonnes calcite-C) had a significant impact on the state of the CO2 system, causing relative increases of up to 50 μatm in surface pCO2 in association with alkalinity and water temperature changes. Gradients in pCO2 were as great as 100 μatm over horizontal distances of 20–40 km. The environmental implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the spatial and temporal distributions of E. huxleyi.