SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akima, H., RF protection ratio study for AM broadcastingRep. 9243, 44Natl. Inst. of Stand. and Technol. Inst. for Telecommun. Sci., Boulder, Colo.10June, 1966.
  • , CCIR, CCIR interim method for estimating sky-wave field strength and transmission loss at frequencies between the approximate limits of 2 and 30 MHzRep. 252-2Int. Telecommun. Union, Geneva, 1970.
  • , CCIR,Subjective assessment of sound quality,Recom. 562-1,XV Plenary Assembly, volX, part 1, p.215,Int. Telecommun. Union,Geneva,1982a.
  • , CCIR,Protection ratios in LF, MF and HF broadcasting,Rep. 794-1,XV Plenary Assembly, volX, part 1, pp.711,Int. Telecommun. Union,Geneva,1982b.
  • , CCIR,Fading allowances in HF broadcasting,Recom. 411-3,XVI Plenary Assembly, volX, part I, p.67,Int. Telecommun. Union,Geneva,1986a.
  • , CCIR,Radio-Frequency Protection Ratios in LF, MF, and HF Broadcasting,Recom. 560-2,XVI Plenary Assembly, volX, part I, pp.78,Int. Telecommun. Union,Geneva,1986b.
  • , CCIR,Protection ratios required for spectrum utilization investigations,Rep. 525-2,XVI Plenary Assembly ,vol1, pp.97100,Int. Telecommun. Union,Geneva,1986c.
  • Freeman, E. R., H. M. Sachs, High frequency (HF) amplitude modulation (AM) signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) studyNTIS AD A040948, 22Natl. Tech. Inf. Serv., Springfield, Va, 1975.
  • , International Frequency Registration Board (IFRB), Improved HFBC planning systemparagraph 5-2-2Int. Telecommun. Union, GenevaFeb., 1989.
  • Kravitz, F., andM. Lemke, Communications/electronics receivers performance degradation handbook,2nd ed.,Dep. of Defense Electromagn. Compat. Analy. Cent. Rep. ESD-013, appendix C,Annapolis, Md.,August1975. (Available asAD A016400 fromNatl. Tech. Inf. Serv.,Springfield, Va.).
  • Laitinen, P. O., G. W. Haydon, Analysis and prediction of sky-wave field intensities in the high frequency bandTech. Rep. 9U.S. Army Signal Radio Propag. Agency, Ft. Monmouth, N.J.October, 1962.
  • Lane, G., Signal-to-Noise Requirements for Speech Communication in Short Wave BroadcastingTech. Rep. ESBA-84-1, 14Voice of America, Washington, D. C.July, 1984.
  • Lane, G., F. J. Rhoads, andL. DeBlasio, Voice of America coverage analysis program (VOACAP): A program guide,VOA B/ESA Rep. 01-93,Washington, D.C.1993. (Available asAD PB 93-155174 fromNatl. Tech. Inf. Serv.,Springfield, Va.).
  • Lane, G., A. B. Richardson, L. M. DeBlasio, Signal-to-noise ratio and aural assessment of broadcast reception quality, IEE 6th International Conference on HF Radio Systems and Techniques, IEE Conf. Publ., 392, 129133, 1994.
  • Lucas, D. L., G. W. Haydon, Predicting statistical performance indexes for high frequency ionospheric telecommunications systemsTech. Rep. IER 1-ITSA 1Environ. Sci. Serv. Admin., Boulder, Colo.August, 1966.
  • Sailors, D. B., C. P. Kugel, G. W. Haydon, Predicting the compatibility of high frequency sky-wave communication systems, IEEE Trans. on Electromagn. Compat., EMC-193, 332343, 1977.
  • Spaulding, A. D., F. G. Stewart, An updated noise model for use in IONCAPRep. 87-212Natl. Telecommun. and Inf. Admin. (NTIA), Boulder, Colo.January, 1987.
  • Thompson, A., The application of the voice interference analysis system to the prediction of voice intelligibility, 1Bell Rep. A70009-280, Tucson, Ariz.Nov., 1967.