• Adijizian, J., B. Ambroise, Topography and precipitation variability: The link between point measurements and areal estimation in mountainsWorkshop on Scale Problems in HydrologyInst. für Hydraul. Gewässerkunde, und Wasserwirt Tech Univ. of ViennaKrumbach, AustriaJune 17–20, 1996.
  • Anderson, M. G., T. P. Burt, Toward more detailed field monitoring of variable source areas, Water Resour. Res., 14, 11231131, 1978a.
  • Anderson, M. G., T. P. Burt, Experimental investigations concerning the topographic control of soil water movement on hillslopes, Z. Geomorphol., 29, 5263, 1978b.
  • Anderson, M. G., P. E. Kneale, Topography and hillslope soil water relationships in a catchment of low relief, J. Hydrol., 47, 115128, 1980.
  • Barling, R. D., I. D. Moore, R. B. Grayson, A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterizing the spatial distribution of zones of surface saturation and soil water content, Water Resour. Res., 30, 10291044, 1994.
  • Beven, K. J., Changing ideas in hydrology: The case of physically based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157172, 1989.
  • Beven, K. J., M. J. Kirkby, A physically based, variable source area model of basin hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24, 4369, 1979.
  • Blöschl, G., andM. Sivapalan, Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review, in Scale Issues in Hydrological Modelling, edited by J. D. Kalma, andM. Sivapalan, chap. 2, pp. 948,John Wiley, New York, 1995.
  • Chiew, F. H. S., T. A. McMahon, Australian data for rainfall-runoff modelling and the calibration of models against streamflow recorded over different time periods, Civ. Eng. Trans. Inst. Eng. Australia, 35, 261274, 1993.
  • Chiew, F. H. S., T. A. McMahon, Application of the daily rainfall-runoff model MODHYDROLOG to twenty eight Australian catchments, J. Hydrol., 153, 383416, 1994.
  • Chiew, F. H. S., M. J. Stewardson, T. A. McMahon, Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modelling approaches, J. Hydrol., 147, 136, 1993.
  • Dunne, T., T. R. Moore, C. H. Taylor, Recognition and prediction of runoff-producing zones in humid regions, Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 20, 305327, 1975.
  • Goodrich, D. C., T. J. Schmugge, T. J. Jackson, C. L. Unkrich, T. O. Keefer, R. Parry, L. B. Bach, S. A. Amer, Runoff simulation sensitivity to remotely sensed initial soil water content, Water Resour. Res., 30, 13931405, 1994.
  • Grayson, R. B., I. D. Moore, T. A. McMahon, Physically based hydrologic modelling, II, Is the concept realistic?, Water Resour. Res., 28, 26592666, 1992.
  • Kalma, J. D., B. C. Bates, R. A. Woods, Predicting catchment-scale soil moisture status with limited field measurements, Scale Issues in Hydrological Modelling, J. D. Kalma, M. Sivapalan, 203225, John Wiley, New York, 1995.
  • Loague, K., Soil water content at R-5, 1, Spatial and temporal variability, J. Hydrol., 139, 233251, 1992.
  • Moore, I. D., G. J. Burch, D. H. Mackenzie, Topographic effects on the distribution of surface soil moisture and the location of ephemeral gullies, Trans. ASAE, 31, 10981107, 1988.
  • O'Loughlin, E. M., Saturation regions in catchments and their relations to soil and topographic properties, J. Hydrol., 53, 229246, 1981.
  • Petch, R. A., Soil saturation patterns in steep, convergent hillslopes under forest and pasture vegetation, Hydrol. Proc., 2, 93103, 1988.
  • Stephenson, G. A., R. A. Freeze, Mathematical simulation of subsurface contributions to snowmelt and runoff, Reynolds Creek watershed, Idaho, Water Resour. Res., 10, 284294, 1974.
  • Zaslavsky, D., G. Sinai, Surface hydrology, I, Explanation of phenomena, J. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. Hydrol. Div., 1, 118, 1981.