SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, M. P., W. W. Woessner, Applied Groundwater Modeling, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1992.
  • Bair, E. S., Model (in)validation: A view from the courtroom, Ground Water, 32(4), 530531, 1994.
    Direct Link:
  • Bredehoeft, J. D., L. F. Konikow, Ground-water models: Validate or invalidate, Ground Water, 31(2), 178179, 1993.
  • Busenberg, E., L. N. Plummer, Use of chlorofluorocarbons (CCl3F and CCl2F2) as hydrologic tracers and age-dating tools: The alluvium and terrace system of central Oklahoma, Water Resour. Res., 28(9), 22572283, 1992.
  • Childress, C. J. O., R. A. Sheets, E. S. Bair, Hydrology and water quality near the South Well Field, southern Franklin County, Ohio, with emphasis on the simulation of ground-water flow and transport of Scioto River, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep91-4080, 78, 1991.
  • Cook, P. G., D. K. Solomon, L. N. Plummer, E. Busenberg, S. L. Schiff, Chlorofluorocarbons as tracers of groundwater transport processes in a shallow, silty sand aquifer, Water Resour. Res., 31(3), 425434, 1995.
  • deLima, V., J. C. Olimpio, Hydrogeology and simulation of ground-water flow at superfund-site wells G and H, Woburn, Massachusetts, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep89-4059, 99, 1989.
  • deMarsily, G., P. Combes, P. Goblet, Comment on “Groundwater models cannot be validated,” by L. F. Konikow and J. D. Bredehoeft, Adv. Water Resour., 15, 367369, 1993.
  • , Department of Energy (DOE),Operable unit 9, Determination of potential pathways from source areas adjacent and within the buried valley aquifer via ground-water flow modeling and particle tracking, report prepared byTerran Corporation for EG&G Mound Applied Technologies, Washington, D. C., 1995.
  • Dumouchelle, D. H., C. W. Schalk, G. L. Rowe, J. T. deRoche, Hydrogeology, simulated ground-water flow, and ground-water quality, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep93-4047, 152Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 1993.
  • Hill, M. C., C. Zheng, Progress made in groundwater flow and transport modeling, Eos Trans. AGU, 76(40), 393394, 1995.
  • Johnson, A. I., Specific yield: Compilation of specific yields for various materials, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Pap., 1662-D, 74, 1967.
  • Katz, B. G., T. M. Lee, L. N. Plummer, E. Busenberg, Chemical evolution of groundwater near a sinkhole lake, northern Florida, 1, Flow patterns, age of groundwater, and influence of lake water leakage, Water Resour. Res., 31(6), 15491564, 1995.
  • Konikow, L. F., J. D. Bredehoeft, Ground-water models cannot be validated, Adv. Water Resour., 15, 7583, 1992.
  • McClenahen, L. M., Univariate statistical analysis of anisotropy in glaciofluvial aquifers, M.S. thesis,, 147 pp.,Dep. of Geol. Sci., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, 1997.
  • McCombie, C., I. McKinley, Validation: Another perspective, Ground Water, 31(4), 530531, 1993.
  • McDonald, M. G., andA. W. Harbaugh, A modular three-dimensional ground-water flow model, in Techniques of Water Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey,, Book 6,chap. A1,U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, D. C., 1988.
  • Mercer, J. W., S. D. Thomas, B. Ross, Parameters and variables appearing in repository siting modelsNUREG/CR-3066, 244U.S. Nucl. Regul. Comm., Washington, D. C., 1982.
  • Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, K. Belitz, Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in Earth sciences, Science, 263, 641646, 1994.
  • Plummer, L. N., R. L. Michel, E. M. Thurman, P. D. Glynn, Environmental tracers for age dating young groundwater, Regional Groundwater Quality, W. M. Alley, 255294, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993.
  • Pollock, D. W., User's guide for MODFLOW/MODPATH-PLOT, version 3: A particle-tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep94-464, 1994.
  • Reilly, T. E., D. W. Pollock, Effect of seasonal and long-term changes in stress on sources of water to wells, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Pap., 2445, 25, 1995.
  • Reilly, T. E., L. N. Plummer, P. J. Phillips, E. Busenberg, The use of simulation and multiple environmental tracers to quantify groundwater flow in a shallow aquifer, Water Resour. Res., 30(2), 421433, 1994.
  • Shapiro, S. D., G. L. Rowe, P. Schlosser, A. Ludin, andM. Stute, Tritium-helium 3 dating under complex conditions in hydraulically stressed areas of a buried-valley aquifer,Water Resour. Res., 5.
  • Solomon, D. K., E. A. Sudicky, Tritium and Helium 3 isotopic ratios for direct estimation of spatial variations in groundwater recharge, Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 23092319, 1991.
  • Solomon, D. K., S. L. Schiff, R. J. Poreda, W. B. Clarke, A validation of the 3H/3He method for determining groundwater recharge, Water Resour. Res., 29(9), 29512962, 1993.
  • Solomon, D. K., R. J. Poreda, P. G. Cook, A. Hunt, Site characterization using 3H/3He ground-water ages, Cape Cod, MA, Ground Water, 33(6), 988996, 1995.
  • Szabo, Z., D. E. Rice, L. N. Plummer, E. Busenburg, S. Drenkard, P. Schlosser, Age dating of shallow groundwater with chlorofluoro-carbons, tritium/helium 3, and flow path analysis, southern New Jersey coastal plain, Water Resour. Res., 32(4), 10231038, 1996.
  • , U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrologic Laboratory, Hydrologic and physical properties of samples from Champaign County, Ohio, analytical report, 10, Denver, Colo., 1957.
  • , U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrologic Laboratory, Hydrologic and physical properties of samples from Montgomery County, Ohio, analytical report, 33, Denver, Colo., 1963.