Update: Science and security
Article first published online: 3 JUN 2011
©1982. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union
Volume 63, Issue 42, page 817, 19 October 1982
How to Cite
1982), Update: Science and security, Eos Trans. AGU, 63(42), 817–817, doi:10.1029/EO063i042p00817-04.(
- Issue published online: 3 JUN 2011
- Article first published online: 3 JUN 2011
- Cited By
Although ‘a substantial and serious technology transfer [to the Soviet Union] exists,’ open communication of federally funded research does not damage our national security, according to Dale R. Corson, president emeritus of Cornell University and chairman of the National Academy of Sciences' Panel on Scientific Communication and National Security. Corson characterized those technology transfers at a recent press conference on the panel's findings, which are summarized in their report, ‘Science Communications and National Security’ (Eos, October 5, p. 801).
‘A net flow of products, processes, and ideas is continually moving from the United States and its allies to the Soviet Union, through both overt and covert means,’ Corson said. While some of this technology transfer has not compromised national security (‘in part because a technology in question had little or no military significance’), a ‘substantial portion of the transfer has been damaging to national security,’ Corson explained. The ‘damaging transfers’ occur through the ‘legal as well as illegal sale of products, through transfers via third countries, and through a highly organized espionage operation.’