• asthma;
  • immunotherapy;
  • meta-analysis;
  • randomized controlled trials


  1. Top of page
  2. Background
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (“hyposensitization” or “desensitization”) has long been a controversial treatment for asthma. Although beneficial effects upon clinically relevant outcomes have been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, there remains a risk of severe and sometimes fatal anaphylaxis. The recommendations of professional bodies have ranged from cautious acceptance (1) to outright dismissal (2). A recent WHO position paper, which has been endorsed by eight other international and national bodies, concluded that allergen immunotherapy was an effective treatment for patients with allergic asthma (3).

We have previously conducted a meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials of allergen immunotherapy for asthma published between 1954 and 1990 (4). We subsequently conducted a systematic review for the Cochrane Collaboration, including a further 34 trials published between 1957 and 1997 (5). Both reviews concluded that subjects randomized to immunotherapy reported significantly fewer asthma symptoms, required significantly less asthma medication, and demonstrated both reduced nonspecific and reduced allergen-specific bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) compared to those randomized to placebo.

During recent years, there has been increasing interest in new allergen vaccines and new methods of delivery including oral, sublingual, and inhaled immunotherapy. Recombinant peptides containing the relevant epitopes, but lacking the ability to cross-link IgE bound to mast cells, have been evaluated in clinical trials. Finally, the Cochrane Collaboration has standardized protocols for systematic reviews and improved the statistical software for performing meta-analysis. Thus, it was again opportune to update our systematic review of allergen-specific immunotherapy for asthma.


The objectives were as follows:

  • to identify as many as possible of the published ran-domized controlled trials of allergen-specific immuno-therapy for allergic asthma

  • to assess the methodological quality of these randomized controlled trials

  • to estimate the overall efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy upon asthma symptoms, medication requirements, lung function, nonspecific BHR, and allergen-specific BHR

  • to compare the efficacy in asthma of mite, pollen, and animal dander immunotherapy with extracts of other allergens.


  1. Top of page
  2. Background
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References

Selection criteria

This review was restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which provide the best evidence for the efficacy of any medical treatment (6). Only studies which focused upon asthma were included. Studies of immunotherapy for hay fever were considered only if the results for subjects with asthma were separately identified. For the purposes of this review, allergen-specific immunotherapy included the administration of extracts of house-dust mites, pollens, animal danders, or moulds; chemically modified allergoids; or antigen–antibody complexes. Only the subcutaneous route of administration was considered.

Placebo-controlled trials are methodologically stronger, although studies which have administered house dust or other relatively inactive antigenic preparations to the control group were also considered. Double-blind trials were preferred, but single-blind and open studies were also reviewed for possible inclusion.

At least one of the following clinical outcomes had to be reported:

  • asthma symptoms (including symptom scores)

  • asthma medication requirements (including medication scores)

  • lung function (including peak expiratory flow, FEV1, and thoracic gas volume)

  • nonspecific BHR (to histamine, methacholine, or acetylcholine)

  • allergen-specific BHR.

Studies which reported only nonclinical outcomes such as allergen-specific IgE (by RAST or skin prick test) or other in vitro results were excluded.

Studies published in languages other than English were considered if the translated abstract indicated that the study was an RCT of allergen immunotherapy for asthma, and a translator was sought (see Acknowledgments).

Search strategy

MEDLINE searches were undertaken for 1966–98 for studies of immunotherapy and asthma. Review articles identified in this process were surveyed for additional and earlier citations. Dissertation abstracts and Current Contents were also searched to identify more recently published and unpublished studies.

A search was performed of the Asthma database maintained by the Cochrane Airways Group at St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK. This database included all studies with the key words “Asthma” or “Wheez*” from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cinahl databases, together with other studies identified by hand searching. A total of over 900 nonunique citations were identified with the key words “Immunotherap*”, “Hyposensiti*”, or “Desensiti*” and were examined for possible inclusion.

Inclusion of studies in the review was decided by a simple majority of all three reviewers, who independently read the Methods sections of papers identified by the search strategy and applied the stated criteria. Quality assessment was performed by two reviewers, who independently assessed the concealment of allocation by the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and applied the scoring system of Jadad et al. (7).

Statistical considerations

The planned comparisons were as follows:

  • allergen immunotherapy vs placebo

  • allergen immunotherapy vs antigenically inactive control

  • house-dust extracts vs placebo

  • allergen immunotherapy vs untreated control

  • allergen immunotherapy vs inhaled steroid.

These comparisons were performed separately for each outcome, namely, asthma symptoms, medication, lung function, nonspecific BHR, and allergen-specific BHR, whenever the results were reported.

Outcome data were extracted and entered into RevMan, version 3.1.1 (Update Software, Oxford, 1998), for statistical analysis (8). Categorical outcomes were analysed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated by Peto's method for individual studies. The odds ratio is simply the ratio between the immunotherapy and control groups for the odds of subjects being the same or worse to subjects being better after treatment. The convention of the Cochrane Collaboration is to consider odds ratios greater than 1.0 as indicating clinically undesirable outcomes (in this review, worse symptoms, increased medication, deteriorating lung function, and increased nonspecific and allergen-specific BHR).

Continuous outcomes (symptom and medication scores, lung-function parameters, and indices of nonspecific and allergen-specific BHR) were also extracted from tables of results. Where the results were presented only in graphs, these were digitized and then converted to numbers with Un-Scan-It v4.0 (Silk Scientific Corporation, Orem UT, 1996). Continuous outcomes were analysed as standardized mean differences (SMD). The SMD is a statistic which expresses the difference in means between immunotherapy and control groups in units of the pooled standard deviation. Although the Cochrane Collaboration currently favours the weighted mean difference, we chose the SMD because many studies measured the same outcomes on different scales.

Fixed effects models were generally used to obtain summary statistics for the overall efficacy of allergen immunotherapy upon both categorical and continuous outcomes, and chi-square tests were performed to assess heterogeneity between studies. In this context, a P value of <0.05 indicates significant differences between studies and raises the question of whether the results can be meaningfully combined. When significant heterogeneity was found, the overall efficacy was recalculated by random effects models, which provide more realistic estimates of the confidence intervals under these circumstances (9).


  1. Top of page
  2. Background
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References

Description of studies

Sixty-two randomized controlled trials published in 67 papers between 1954 and 1998 were identified which satisfied the inclusion criteria. The methods, participants, allergens administered, and outcomes of the included studies are listed in Table 1. There were 28 studies report-ing immunotherapy for mite allergy, generally Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus or D. farinae, although Armentia Medina et al. (15) used extracts of the storage mite Lepidoglyphus destructor. Three early studies (10, 16, 75) used extracts of house dust, which has since generally been considered antigenically inactive. There were 15 studies of immunotherapy for pollen allergy, utilizing extracts of Bermuda grass, orchard grass/cocksfoot, timothy grass, velvet grass, sweet vernal grass, perennial ryegrass, or ragweed pollen. Nine studies reported immunotherapy for animal dander allergy, particularly to cats and dogs. Two studies utilized extracts of the mould Cladosporium, and five attempted simultaneous immunotherapy for multiple aeroallergens. Four studies from one group of investigators (43–46) used allergen–antibody complexes for immuno-therapy.

Table 1.  Randomized controlled trials of allergen-specific immunotherapy for asthma included in this systematic review: methods, participants, allergen extracts, outcomes, and methodological quality (see text)
Study (Ref.)MethodsParticipants, ageAllergen extractsOutcomesQuality
  1. DB PC RCT: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trial; SB PC XO: Single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover; Open UC: open untreated controls; SB HDC: Single-blind, house dust extract controlled; open ISC: open inhaled steroid controlled; AS-BHR: allergen-specific bronchial hyperreactivity; PEF: peak expiratory flow rate; NS-BHR: nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity; TGV: thoracic gas volume; concealment of allocation: A) clearly adequate, B) unclear, C) inadequate, D) not used.

Aas (10)DB PC RCT80 asthma, 12–14 yearsHouse dustSymptoms, AS-BHR4 A
Adkinson et al. (11)DB PC RCT121 asthma, 5–14 yearsMultipleSymptoms, medication, PEF4 B
Alvarez Cuesta et al. (12)DB PC RCT28 asthma and rhinitis,CatSymptoms, Medication,3 B
   15-28 years  NS-BHR, AS-BHR 
Amaral Marques & Avila (13)DB PC RCT28 asthma, 12–55 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication2 B
Armentia Medina et al. (14)DB PC RCT30 pollen-allergic,PollenNS-BHR, AS-BHR1 B
   12–50 years
Armentia Medina et al. (15)DB RCT35 mite-allergicMiteSymptoms, medication,4 B
   13–63 years  NS-BHR 
British Tuberculosis Association (16)DB PC RCT96 asthma, mean 24 yearsHouse dustSymptoms, medication,4 A
British Thoracic Association (17)DB PC RCT70 asthmaMiteSymptoms, medication,3 B
   66%>30 years  FEV1 
Baur (18)SB PC XO RCT39 asthma, 18–45 yearsMultipleAS-BHR1 B
Bertelsen et al. (19)Open UC RCT27 asthma, 7–15 yearsCat/dogAS-BHR2 D
Bousquet et al. (20)Open PC RCT48 pollen-allergic,PollenSymptoms, medication1 D
   10–51 years
Bousquet et al. (21)DB PC RCT30 asthma, 18–42 yearsMiteAS-BHR2 A
Bousquet et al. (22)Open UC RCT215 asthma, 3–72 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,1 D
Bousquet et al. (23)Mixed PC RCT60 pollen-allergic,PollenSymptoms, medication2 A
   12–46 years
Bousquet et al. (24)DB PC RCT57 pollen-allergic,PollenSymptoms3 A
   11–45 years
Bruce et al. (25)PC RCT39 asthmaPollenSymptoms, AS-BHR3 B
Buchanan et al. (26)DB PC RCT55 adult asthmaMiteSymptoms, medication,2 B
     asthma attacks 
Cantani et al. (27)DB PC RCT20 asthma, 4–13 yearsMultipleSymptoms, medication,2 A
     global evaluation 
Choovaravech (28)SB HDC RCT57 asthmaMiteSymptoms, medication,1 B
   Mean 30.4 years  PEF 
Creticos et al. (29)DB PC RCT77 adult asthmaPollenSymptoms, medication,4 A
   Mean 35.5 years  PEF, AS-BHR 
D'Souza et al. (30)DB PC RCT91 asthma, >10 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication4 B
Dolz et al. (31)DB PC RCT28 pollen-allergic,PollenSymptoms, medication,3 B
   15–35 years  AS-BHR 
Dreborg et al. (32)DB PC RCT30 mould-allergic,MouldSymptoms, medication,2 B
   5–17 years  PEF, AS-BHR 
Franco et al. (33)DB PC RCT49 asthma, mean ageMiteSymptoms, medication,1 B
   24.5 years  PEF, NS-BHR 
Frankland & Augustin (34)DB PC RCT200 pollen-allergic,PollenSymptoms3 B
   >10 years
Gaddie et al. (35)DB PC RCT55 asthma, 13–68 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,2 B
Haugaard & Dahl (36)DB PC RCT24 animal-allergicCat/dogSymptoms, NS-BHR,3 C
   asthma, 13–48 years  AS-BHR 
Hill et al. (37)Open PC RCT20 asthma, 9–14 yearsPollenSymptoms, medication1 D
Johnstone (38)DB PC RCT112 pollen-allergicPollenSymptoms1 C
Johnstone & Crump (39)DB PC RCT173 asthmatic childrenMultipleSymptoms5 B
Johnstone & Dutton (40)DB PC RCT130 asthma, <16 yearsMultipleSymptoms5 B
Kohno et al. (41)Open UC RCT16 asthma, 19–41 yearsMiteSymptoms, PEF,2 D
     NS-BHR, AS-BHR 
Kuna et al. (42)DB PC RCT24 asthmaPollenSymptoms, FEV1,3 A
   Mean 27.2 years  NS-BHR 
Machiels et al. (43)DB PC RCT39 asthma, 16–57 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,3 B
Machiels et al. (44)DB PC RCT30 pollen-allergic,PollenSymptoms, medication3 B
   14–57 years
Machiels et al. (45)DB PC RCT51 pollen-allergic,PollenSymptoms, medication3 B
   12–51 years
Machiels et al. (46)DB PC RCT39 asthma, 16–57 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,3 B
     FEV1, NS-BHR, AS-BHR 
Malling (47), Malling et al. (48, 49)DB PC RCT22 asthma, 16–60 yearsMouldSymptoms, medication,4 B
Maunsell et al. (50)DB HDC RCT34 asthma, 16–56 yearsMiteSymptoms2 B
Mosbech et al. (51–53)DB PC RCT46 asthma, 18–56 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,2 A
Newton et al. (54)DB PC RCT14 asthma, 18–44 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,3 B
     PEF, AS-BHR 
Ohman et al. (55)DB PC RCT17 asthma, 22–48 yearsCatSymptoms, PEF, NS-BHR,3 A
Olsen et al. (56)DB PC RCT31 asthma, 18–64 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,5 A
     PEF, FEV1, AS-BHR 
Ortolani et al. (57)DB PC RCT15 asthma, 15–45 yearsPollenSymptoms, AS-BHR2 B
Paranos & Petrovic (58)SB PC RCT14 asthma, 20–40 yearsMiteMedication, PEF, FEV11 B
Pauli et al. (59)DB PC RCT18 asthma, 19–40 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,4 B
Pichler et al. (60)DB PC RCT30 asthma, 20–46 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,2 B
Price et al. (61)DB PC RCT25 asthma, 5–15 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,3 B
Reid et al. (62)DB PC RCT18 asthma, 20–39 yearsPollenSymptoms, medication4 A
Sabbah et al. (63)DB PC RCT52 asthma,MiteSymptoms, medication2 B
   mean 28.7 years
Shaikh (64)Open ISC RCT51 asthma, 22–36 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,3 D
Smith (65)DB PC RCT22 asthma, 11–48 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,3 B
Sundin et al. (66)DB PC RCT39 asthma, 8–47 yearsCat/dogSymptoms,3 B
     NS-BHR, AS-BHR 
Taylor et al. (67)DB PC RCT42 asthma, 6–15 yearsMiteLung function, height and2 B
     weight, chest examination 
Taylor et al. (68)DB PC RCT10 asthma, 20–43 yearsCatNS-BHR, AS-BHR4 B
Torres Costa et al. (69)Open ISC RCT22 asthma, 12–28 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,3 D
     PEF, FEV1, NS-BHR 
Valovirta et al. (70, 71)DB PC RCT27 asthma, 5–18 yearsDogSymptoms, AS-BHR3 A
van Bever & Stevens (72)DB PC RCT18 asthma, 7–22 yearsMiteNS-BHR, AS-BHR3 B
van Metre et al. (73)DB PC RCT22 asthma, 21–52 yearsCatNS-BHR, AS-BHR3 B
Varney et al. (74)DB PC RCT28 asthma, 19–50 yearsCatSymptoms, AS-BHR3 B
Vooren (75)DB PC RCT12 asthmaHouse dustSymptoms, medication,3 B
     FEV1, AS-BHR 
Warner et al. (76)DB PC RCT51 asthma, 5–14 yearsMiteSymptoms, medication,4 B
     TGV, AS-BHR 

A further 125 studies were excluded from this review (77–201). The most common but not mutually exclusive reasons for exclusion were as follows: 37 studies were not randomized (84, 86, 91, 93, 97, 98, 103, 105, 108, 114, 116, 120, 122, 123, 126, 130, 132, 133, 135, 140, 145, 146, 149, 151, 157, 159, 163, 164, 166, 176, 177, 180, 185, 189, 193, 194, 198), 25 studies were not controlled (87–89, 99, 101, 107, 115, 121, 128, 131, 134, 137, 140, 148–150, 155, 169, 172, 181, 184, 189, 195, 199, 201), 29 studies solely or predominantly involved subjects who had allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis rather than asthma (77, 79, 80, 82, 85, 90, 94, 96, 100, 108113, 117119, 127, 130, 138, 139, 153, 158, 160, 161, 174, 176, 192), 13 studies did not report clinically relevant outcomes (81, 129, 134, 144, 152, 155, 165, 166, 173, 179, 190, 196, 200), and one study was not analysed by intention to treat (171).

We also identified 14 clinical trials of oral immunotherapy (92, 106, 124, 125, 139, 156, 158, 167, 170, 175, 186–188, 191), seven trials of inhaled or intranasal immunotherapy (79, 80, 95, 142, 143, 147, 183), nine trials of sublingual immunotherapy (78, 90, 102, 110, 154, 158, 162, 182, 197), and one trial of homoeopathic immunotherapy (168) which were beyond the scope of the present review. Finally, six abstracts (83, 104, 119, 136, 141, 178) contained insufficient information for further assessment.

Two studies included in our previous review were excluded after closer examination, as they did not meet all the inclusion criteria. The untreated controls in Murray et al. (149) were not randomly allocated and the “placebo” controls were contaminated by concurrent administration of pollen immunotherapy. The allocation of subjects to high- or low-dose immunotherapy by Tuchinda & Chai (189) was not randomized. A further 13 studies published before or during 1998 were considered for possible inclusion. Clarification was sought from the authors as to whether they had conducted randomized controlled trials, but no replies were received by the time of submission.

Methodological quality

A key criterion for assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials for which there is evidence of a relationship to the potential for bias in the results is concealment of allocation after randomization to active treatment or control (6). For this review, concealment of allocation was assessed (Table 1) as clearly adequate (category A) in only 13 studies (10, 16, 21, 23, 24, 27, 29, 42, 51, 55, 56, 62, 70). The adequacy or otherwise of 40 studies could not be determined from the details published in the papers (category B) and further information was sought from the authors. Only two studies (36, 45) used a clearly inadequate method for concealment of allocation (category C). A further seven open studies did not use any concealment of allocation (category D).

The quality score developed by Jadad et al. (7) awarded points for randomization, double blinding, whether these methods were well described and appropriate, and whether withdrawals and dropouts were described. Only three studies (39, 40, 56) achieved the maximum possible score of five points. Eleven studies received four points, 24 received three points, 15 received two points, and nine received only one point for methodological quality (Table 1). There was a high level of agreement between reviewers, and differences were resolved by consensus.

Fifty-three studies were placebo-controlled trials of allergen-specific immunotherapy, two compared immuno-therapy with an antigenically inactive control (28, 50), three compared house dust with placebo (10, 16, 75), and three utilized untreated controls (19, 22, 41). Only one study directly compared immunotherapy with inhaled steroids (64), although Torres Costa et al. (69) administered inhaled beclomethasone to both the active treatment and control groups for the first 18 months.

Asthma symptoms

The results of the individual placebo-controlled trials and combined effects for each outcome are presented in Figs. 1–10. Symptom scores were reported by 22 studies, although neither Dreborg et al. (32) nor Olsen et al. (56) published the standard deviations (SDs), thus preventing the calculation of the standardized mean difference (SMD) for these studies. The combined SMD for symptom scores after mite immunotherapy was –0.71 with a 95% confidence interval of –1.37 to –0.05, which excluded 0, thus indicating a significant reduction in asthma symptoms (Fig. 1). The combined SMD after pollen immunotherapy was –0.72 (95% CI –1.14 to –0.31) also indicating significant symptomatic improvement. However, there was no significant improvement after immunotherapy with cat, dog, or multiple allergen extracts. For all allergens combined, the SMD was –0.73 (95% CI –1.07 to –0.39), but there was significant heterogeneity between studies (χ2=86.2, P<0.0005), with three studies (11, 25, 37) not finding any reduction in symptoms.


Figure 1. Meta-analysis of asthma symptom scores from placebo-controlled trials of allergen immunotherapy for asthma – standardized mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study, studies of mite, pollen, and other immunotherapy and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 2. Meta-analysis of symptomatic deterioration from placebo-controlled trials – odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study, studies of mite, pollen, animal dander, and other immunotherapy and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 3. Meta-analysis of asthma medication scores from placebo-controlled trials – standardized mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study, studies of mite, pollen, and other immunotherapy and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 4. Meta-analysis of increased asthma medication requirements from placebo-controlled trials – odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 5. Meta-analysis of lung function parameters from placebo-controlled trials – standardized mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study, peak expiratory flow, FEV1, and thoracic gas volume.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 6. Meta-analysis of deterioration in lung function from placebo-controlled trials – odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 7. Meta-analysis of indices of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity from placebo-controlled trials – standardized mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study, logPD20 to methacholine, logPC20 to histamine, logPC35 to acetylcholine, and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 8. Meta-analysis of increased nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity from placebo-controlled trials – odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 9. Meta-analysis of indices of allergen-specific bronchial hyperreactivity from placebo-controlled trials – standardized mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study, studies of mite, pollen, animal dander, and other immunotherapy and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 10. Meta-analysis of increased allergen-specific bronchial hyperreactivity from placebo-controlled trials – odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) for each study and all studies combined.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Symptoms were simply reported as worse, the same, or improved in another 22 studies. The combined odds ratio (OR) was 0.26, with a 95% CI from 0.17 to 0.41, which excluded 1, again indicating that patients randomized to immunotherapy were significantly less likely to report a deterioration in asthma symptoms than those randomized to placebo (Fig. 2). There were significant homogeneous improvements after immunotherapy with extracts of pollen (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04–0.42), animal dander (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05–0.87), and other allergens (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.09–0.32). Less improvement was seen after mite immunotherapy (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21–0.75), and there was significant heterogeneity between these studies (χ2=21.3, P<0.05). Although the results of studies of children were relatively homogeneous (data not shown), there was significant heterogeneity between the results of adult studies (χ2=40, P<0.001), two studies (17, 26) actually finding symptoms to be more likely in treated patients.

Medication requirements

Asthma medication scores were reported by 13 studies, with Cantani et al. (27), Dreborg et al. (32), and Olsen et al. (56) failing to publish the SDs. The combined SMD was –0.71 (95% CI –1.09 to –0.32), indicating a significant reduction in medication after immunotherapy (Fig. 3). There was a large reduction after mite immunotherapy, although this was accompanied by significant heterogeneity (χ2=16.1, P<0.005). The reduction after pollen immunotherapy achieved statistical significance in a fixed effects model (SMD=–0.54, 95% CI –0.85 to –0.23). Medication requirements were simply reported as increased, unchanged, or decreased in 16 studies. The combined OR was 0.32 (95% CI 0.22–0.46), indicating that patients randomized to immunotherapy were significantly less likely to require increased medication than those randomized to placebo (Fig. 4). Although there was significant heterogeneity between the studies reporting medication scores (χ2=28.7, P<0.001), there was substantial homogeneity between the latter 15 studies.

Lung function

Lung-function results were reported by 14 studies, with several studies failing to provide SDs for peak expiratory flow (32), FEV1 (35, 46), or thoracic gas volume (61, 76). There was no overall improvement in lung-function parameters after immunotherapy (Fig. 5), and there was marked heterogeneity in peak expiratory flow between studies (χ2=27.6, P<0.0005). Indeed, there was even a suggestion that FEV1 deteriorated after immunotherapy in a small study by Paranos & Petrovic (58), in which the baseline lung function of patients randomized to mite immunotherapy and placebo was poorly matched. Lung function was simply reported as worse, the same, or improved in seven studies. Although there was homogeneity between these studies and an overall trend against a deterioration in lung function after immunotherapy, this did not achieve statistical significance (Fig. 6).

Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR)

Indices of nonspecific BHR were reported by 12 studies. There were significant improvements in PD20 FEV1 to methacholine challenge (SMD –0.30, 95% CI –0.54 to–0.05) and in PC35 sGaw to acetylcholine after immunotherapy with allergen–antibody complexes (43). The improvement in PC20 FEV1 to histamine challenge failed to achieve statistical significance in a random effects model. Although there was significant heterogeneity between the results of these studies (χ2=22.7, P<0.025), there was an overall reduction in nonspecific BHR after immunotherapy (SMD –0.48, 95% CI –0.81 to –0.14) (Fig. 7). Nonspecific BHR was simply reported as increased, unchanged, or reduced in five small studies. There was homogeneity between these studies, and the combined OR of 0.22 (95% CI 0.10–0.48) indicated that patients randomized to immunotherapy were significantly less likely to develop increased nonspecific BHR than those randomized to placebo (Fig. 8).

Indices of allergen-specific BHR (such as PD20 FEV1 to allergen challenge) were reported by 14 studies. There was homogeneity between these studies with an overall SMD of–0.70 (95% CI –0.91 to –0.48), indicating a significant reduction in allergen-specific BHR after immunotherapy (Fig. 9). The effect was most marked for mite immunotherapy (SMD –1.14, 95% CI –1.62 to –0.65), and similar for pollen (SMD –0.69, 95% CI –1.09 to –0.30) and animal dander (SMD –0.71, 95% CI –1.08 to –0.34), but not significant for other allergens. Allergen-specific BHR was simply reported as increased, unchanged, or reduced by 16 studies. There was homogeneity between studies, and the combined OR of 0.28 (95% CI 0.19–0.41) indicated that patients randomized to immunotherapy were significantly less likely to develop increased allergen-specific BHR (Fig. 10).

Other comparisons

Because of the small number and disparate outcomes reported by the non-placebo-controlled randomized trials, only limited meta-analysis could be performed. Choovoravech (28) did not find a significant reduction in asthma symptoms comparing house-dust-mite (HDM) immunotherapy with house dust (SMD=–0.23, 95% CI–0.77 to 0.30). However, Maunsell et al. (50) did find that patients randomized to HDM were significantly less likely to report asthma symptoms than those randomized to house dust (OR=0.2, 95% CI 0.05–0.8). Choovoravech (28) did not find any significant reduction in asthma medications after immunotherapy (OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.15–1.7).

The three studies (10, 16, 75) which compared house-dust extracts with placebo found negative results for most outcomes. Subjects randomized to house dust were less likely to report worse asthma symptoms, but the combined effect did not achieve statistical significance (OR=0.45, 95% CI 0.14–1.4). In the British Tuberculosis Association (16) study, those randomized to house dust had minimal reduction in asthma medication (OR=0.76, 95% CI 0.27–2.2) and were marginally less likely to show deterioration in lung function (OR=0.79, 95% CI 0.3–2.1). However, Aas (10) found that asthmatic children randomized to house dust had significantly reduced allergen-specific BHR (OR=0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.59).

On the other hand, studies with untreated controls reported strongly positive results of allergen immunotherapy. Both Bousquet et al. (22) and Kohno et al. (41) found that patients randomized to immunotherapy demonstrated a significant reduction in asthma symptoms (combined SMD=–2.5, 95% CI –3.0 to –2.0) and a significant improvement in lung function (combined SMD=–0.81, 95% CI –1.21 to –0.39). Bousquet et al. (22) also reported significantly reduced medication requirements in the immunotherapy group (SMD=–2.6, 95% CI –3.1 to 2.0). Finally, Bertelsen et al. (19) found that those randomized to immunotherapy were significantly less likely to develop increased allergen-specific BHR (OR=0.2, 95% CI 0.05–0.9).

The only trial to compare allergen immunotherapy directly with inhaled steroids (64) found that symptom scores and FEV1 improved more rapidly in the group randomized to budesonide. However, as no standard deviations were reported, it was not possible to calculate standardized mean differences. In any case, there were no other trials with which these results could be meaningfully combined.


  1. Top of page
  2. Background
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References

This updated systematic review of allergen immunotherapy for asthma has identified an additional 10 randomized controlled trials which were not covered by our previous review of studies published up to 1997 (5). Most of the studies not previously included were published during or after 1997. Two trials which were included in the previous review were excluded on this occasion after closer examination revealed that they did not meet all the inclusion criteria. A total of 125 studies were excluded from the review, mainly because they were not randomized, not controlled, did not report clinically relevant outcomes, or involved only subjects with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Given the well-recognized bias for the publication of positive studies, it is quite possible that some additional negative studies have been conducted, but that their results have not been published in the medical literature. This problem could be avoided in the future by prospective registration of all clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy, as has been attempted in other clinical disciplines. Unfortunately, the concealment of allocation after randomization could not be clearly determined from the information presented in most of the papers. We would encourage authors of future papers to follow the CONSORT guidelines (202) and fully report such details. However, there was no obvious relationship between concealment or methodological quality and the findings of individual RCTs of immunotherapy.

This meta-analysis has confirmed that allergen-specific immunotherapy can significantly reduce asthma symptoms and medication requirements. The heterogeneity of symptom and medication scores is likely to have arisen from the different scoring schemes used in different studies. The heterogeneity of symptom scores remained significant after stratifying for the allergen administered. All but one study (23) combined both symptomatic and anti-inflammatory medications into a single score. We have previously criticized this approach (203), as changes in bronchodilator requirements could be obscured by changes in inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Standardization of asthma symptom and medication scores is required for easier interpretation of future studies. However, we do not believe that the heterogeneity of the results means that the studies should not be combined at all or that it invalidates the conclusions.

Medication requirements which were reported as categories, in contrast to the analysis using medication scores, showed significant homogeneity. We believe that this finding can translate into a clinically useful outcome, as one of the principal aims of attempting allergen immuno-therapy is to decrease medication requirements. While inhaled corticosteroid therapy remains the mainstay of asthma management, any reduction in this type of treatment while maintaining good asthma control would be welcome.

There was no consistent effect of immunotherapy upon lung function. The marked heterogeneity may have arisen from attempting to combine such diverse measures of lung function as FEV1, peak expiratory flow, and thoracic gas volume. These parameters presumably reflect different aspects of the pulmonary pathophysiology of asthma, such as reduced airway calibre, variable airflow limitation, and hyperinflation. However, significant heterogeneity remained after stratifying the analysis for each parameter. In contrast, our first meta-analysis (4) did find a modest improvement in lung function. However, in retrospect, this conclusion resulted substantially from the retrospective exclusion of one negative study (61) in response to a reviewer's concerns.

Patients randomized to immunotherapy were significantly less likely to develop increased nonspecific BHR, and there were modest improvement indices of nonspecific BHR. Homogeneity was achieved by stratifying the meta-analysis for each index of nonspecific BHR: PD20 FEV1 to methacholine, PC20 FEV1 to histamine, and PC35 sGaw to acetylcholine. Since indices of BHR are generally considered to follow a log normal distribution, the means and standard deviations of logPD20 were entered into RevMan to calculate the SMD.

Allergen immunotherapy significantly reduced allergen-specific BHR. Homogeneity was achieved by stratifying the meta-analysis for the allergen administered and expressing the results as logPD20. It would be desirable for future studies to use a standardized protocol for bronchial allergen challenges and to report the results in a more consistent fashion. Not surprisingly, it would appear that allergen immunotherapy has a greater effect upon allergen-specific BHR than upon nonspecific BHR.

The finding that allergen immunotherapy significantly and homogeneously improves allergen-specific bronchial BHR is clinically important. Patients with brittle extrinsic (allergic) asthma are at risk of sudden deterioration when exposed to increased levels of an aeroallergen to which they are sensitive. Any intervention which reduces the risk of an acute episode of asthma under these circumstances would be clinically useful. Currently, the measurement of allergen-specific BHR is the only accurate method of assessing such a risk.

Less importance should be attached to the results of the relatively small number of non-placebo-controlled trials. There is some evidence that HDM extracts may reduce asthma symptoms and allergen-specific BHR compared to house-dust extracts. One study even suggested that house-dust extracts alone could reduce allergen-specific BHR, challenging the view that such extracts are antigenically inactive. However, taken together, these results are consistent with the greater efficacy of HDM extracts compared with placebo. Studies with untreated controls are particularly susceptible to bias and may overestimate the true benefit of treatment. The effects of immunotherapy upon symptoms, medication, and lung function found in such studies are beyond the upper confidence limits for placebo-controlled studies.

The results of this systematic review are consistent with our previous meta-analyses (4, 5), and, importantly, the positive findings have not been overturned by the inclusion of additional randomized controlled trials. If anything, the combined effects of allergen immunotherapy upon symptom and medication scores are greater than previously estimated. In this review, greater control of heterogeneity was achieved with stratification by allergen and calcu-lation of combined effects by random rather than fixed effects models. The effects on all other outcomes were unchanged.

None the less, there are still some limitations to the present review. None of the studies included any data relating to asthma exacerbations, emergency room visits, or hospital admissions. Such unstable patients are rarely included in clinical trials, especially those of allergen immunotherapy. The safety of immunotherapy, particularly the occurrence of major systemic reactions, lies beyond the scope of the present review. Rare side-effects are often not adequately assessed in reports of clinical trials (4) and are better captured by schemes reporting adverse reactions. A narrative review by Lockey (204) identified 27 fatal anaphylactic reactions over a 6-year period (1985–91) during which up to 10 million allergen injections were administered annually in the USA. The mean rate of systemic reactions was 1/200 injections.


  1. Top of page
  2. Background
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References

This report confirms the efficacy of immunotherapy; in particular, we emphasize the clinically useful outcomes of decreased medication requirements and improved allergen-specific BHR. Not only did these two outcomes show statistically significant improvement, but also the results were homogeneous. We believe that a reduction in medication and decreased allergen-specific BHR are clinically important findings and can lead to improved asthma control.

These results give no direct guidance concerning the clinical application of allergen immunotherapy. We have previously stated the well-accepted principles that we follow in using immunotherapy in asthma (4). These issues are discussed more fully in a joint position statement of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (205) and the WHO position paper (3). We fully endorse these position papers and recommend that interested readers refer to them.

However, certain questions remain to be answered. What are the most important determinants of the clinical relevance of an allergen? Which patient is the ideal recipient of immunotherapy? Is the result better when there is a narrow range of positive skin tests, or is it just as effective in panreactors? Is monocomponent immunotherapy better than the use of multiple allergens to which the patient reacted? What is the optimal length of treatment and the best duration of effect? How does the cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy compare to new pharmacologic treatments for asthma? Some of these questions may be answered in the studies currently available, but others will require new and better designed randomized controlled trials.


  1. Top of page
  2. Background
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References

We thank Daniel Czarny, Rosa Dias Santilhiano, Andrei Saramovich, Fiona Savio, Georg Schäppi, Noortje Hamse, Brechje Gosens, and Paul Angel for their assistance in translating studies published in languages other than English. The German Assistant (Microtac software) was used to translate papers published in German. David Hill kindly gave us access to the original data from his randomized controlled trial of grass pollen immunotherapy in children with asthma. Jean Bousquet provided unpublished methodological details about the trials conducted by his research group. The Cochrane Airways Group database was searched by Steve Milan and Anna Bara. David Badger and Vivienne Moore from the Australasian Cochrane Centre and Anna Bara gave advice on the use of RevMan. Peter Gibson and Paul Jones provided helpful comments on a previous version of this review.


  1. Top of page
  2. Background
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Conclusions
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. References
  • 1
    Weeke B. The future for immunotherapy. Clin Exp Allergy 1991;21 Suppl 1:8692
  • 2
    Henry RL, Landau LI, Mellis C, et al. Childhood asthma: application of the international view of management in Australia and New Zealand. J Paediatr Child Health 1990;26:7274
  • 3
    Bousquet J, Lockey RF, Malling H-J. Allergen immunotherapy – therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases. Allergy 1998;53 Suppl 44:442
  • 4
    Abramson M, Puy R, Weiner J. Is allergen immunotherapy effective in asthma? A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151:969974
  • 5
    Abramson MJ, Puy RM, Weiner JM. Allergen specific immunotherapy for asthma (Cochrane Review)In: Cochrane Library, Issue 3 1998. Oxford: Update Software
  • 6
    Kunz R, Oxman AD. The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1998;317:11851190
  • 7
    Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clin Trials 1996;17:112
  • 8
    Clarke M, Fischer M, Moustgaard R, Riis J. User guide for Review Manager (RevMan). Version 3.1 for Windows Cochrane Collaboration, 1997
  • 9
    Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:820826
  • 10
    Aas K. Hyposensitization in house dust allergy asthma. A double-blind controlled study with evaluation of the effect on bronchial sensitivity to house dust. Acta Paediatr Scand 1971;60:264268
  • 11
    Adkinson NF, Eggleston PA, Eney D, et al. A controlled trial of immunotherapy for asthma in allergic children. N Engl J Med 1997;336:324331
  • 12
    Alvarez Cuesta E, Cuesta Herranz J, Puyana Ruiz J, Cuesta Herranz C, Blanco Quiros A. Monoclonal antibody-standardized cat extract immunotherapy: risk-benefit effects from a double-blind placebo study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994;93:556566
  • 13
    Amaral Marques R, Avila R. Results of a clinical trial with a Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus tyrosine adsorbed vaccine. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1978;6:231235
  • 14
    Armentia Medina A, Blanco Quiros A, Martin Santos JM, et al. Rush immunotherapy with a standardized Bermuda grass pollen extract. Ann Allergy 1989;63:127135
  • 15
    Armentia Medina A, Tapias JA, Martin JF, Ventas P, Fernandez A. Immunotherapy with the storage mite Lepidoglyphus destructor. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1995;23:211223
  • 16
    British Tuberculosis Association. Treatment of house dust allergy. BMJ 1968;3:774777
  • 17
    British Thoracic Association. A trial of house dust mite extract in bronchial asthma. Br J Dis Chest 1979;73:260270
  • 18
    Baur X. Hyposensitization in bronchial asthma – still a current therapeutic procedure?. Med Klin 1989;84:439444
  • 19
    Bertelsen A, Andersen JB, Christensen J, Ingermann L, Kristensen T, Østergaard PA. Immunotherapy with dog and cat extracts in children. Allergy 1989;44:330335
  • 20
    Bousquet J, Guerin B, Dotte A, et al. Comparison between rush immunotherapy with a standardised allergen and an alum adjuved pyridine extracted material in grass pollen allergy. Clin Allergy 1985;15:179193
  • 21
    Bousquet J, Calvayrac P, Guerin B, et al. Immunotherapy with a standardised Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. I. In vivo and in vitro parameters after a short course of treatment J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985;76:734744
  • 22
    Bousquet J, Hejjaoui A, Clauzel AM, et al. Immunotherapy with a standardised Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. II. Prediction of efficacy of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:971977
  • 23
    Bousquet J, Maasch HJ, Hejjaoui A, et al. Double blind placebo controlled immunotherapy with mixed grass pollen allergoids. III. Efficacy and safety of unfractionated and high molecular weight preparations in rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;84:546556
  • 24
    Bousquet J, Hejjaoui A, Soussana M, Michel FB. Double-blind, placebo-controlled immunotherapy with mixed grass-pollen allergoids. IV. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of two dosages of a high-molecular-weight allergoid. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;85:490497
  • 25
    Bruce CA, Norman PS, Rosenthal RR, Lichtenstein LM. The role of ragweed pollen in autumnal asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1977;59:449459
  • 26
    Buchanan DJ, Hillis A, Williams PN. A double blind controlled trial of Bencard house dust mite (Migen) hyposensitization in Zambian asthmatics. Med J Zambia 1981;15:1416
  • 27
    Cantani A, Ragno V, Monteleone MA, Lucenti P, Businco L. Enzyme potentiated desensitisation in children with asthma and mite allergy: a double blind study. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1996;6:270276
  • 28
    Choovoravech P. Effect of immunotherapy in bronchial asthma: treatment with extracts of house dust and mite. J Med Assoc Thai 1974;57:445449
  • 29
    Creticos PS, Reed CS, Norman PS, et al. Ragweed immunotherapy in adult asthma. N Engl J Med 1996;334:501506
  • 30
    D'Souza MF, Pepys J, Wells ID, et al. Hyposensitisation with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in house dust allergy: a controlled study of clinical and immunological effects. Clin Allergy 1973;3:177193
  • 31
    Dolz I, Martínez-Cócera C, Bartolomé JM, Cimarra M. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy with grass-pollen extract Alutard SQ during a 3-year period with initial rush immunotherapy. Allergy 1996;51:489500
  • 32
    Dreborg S, Agrell B, Foucard T, et al. A double blind multicentre immunotherapy trial in children using a purified and standardised Cladosporium herbarum preparation. Allergy 1986;41:131140
  • 33
    Franco C, Barbadori S, Freshwater LL, Kordash TR. A double-blind, placebo controlled study of Alpare mite D. pteronyssinus immunotherapy in asthmatic patients. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1995;23:5866
  • 34
    Frankland AW, Augustin R. Prophylaxis of summer hay fever and asthma. Lancet 1954;1:10551057
  • 35
    Gaddie J, Skinner C, Palmer KNV. Hyposensitisation with house dust mite vaccine in bronchial asthma. BMJ 1976;2:561562
  • 36
    Haugaard L, Dahl R. Immunotherapy in patients allergic to cat and dog dander. I. Clinical results. Allergy 1992;47:249254
  • 37
    Hill DJ, Hosking CS, Shelton MJ, Turner MW. Failure of hyposensitisation in treatment of children with grass-pollen asthma. BMJ 1982;284:306309
  • 38
    Johnstone DE. Study of the role of antigen dosage in the treatment of pollenosis and pollen asthma. Am J Dis Child 1957;94:15
  • 39
    Johnstone DE, Crump L. Value of hyposensitisation therapy for bronchial asthma in children. Pediatrics 1961;27:3944
  • 40
    Johnstone DE, Dutton A. The value of hyposensitisation therapy for bronchial asthma in children – a 14 year study. Pediatrics 1968;42:793802
  • 41
    Kohno Y, Minoguchi K, Oda N, et al. Effect of rush immunotherapy on airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness after bronchoprovocation with allergen in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;102:927934
  • 42
    Kuna P, Alam R, Kuzminska B, Rozniecki J. The effect of preseasonal immunotherapy on the production of histamine-releasing factor (HRF) by mononuclear cells from patients with seasonal asthma: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:816824
  • 43
    Machiels JJ, Somville MA, Lebrun PM, Lebecque SJ, Jacquemin MG, Saint Remy JMR. Allergic bronchial asthma due to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus hypersensitivity can be efficiently treated by inoculation of allergen-antibody complexes. J Clin Invest 1990;85:10241035
  • 44
    Machiels JJ, Buche M, Somville MA, Jacquemin MG, Saint-Remy JM. Complexes of grass pollen allergens and specific antibodies reduce allergic symptoms and inhibit the seasonal increase of IgE antibody. Clin Exp Allergy 1990;20:653660
  • 45
    Machiels JJ, Somville MA, Jacquemin MG, Saint-Remy JMR. Allergen-antibody complexes can efficiently prevent seasonal rhinitis and asthma in grass pollen hypersensitive patients. Allergen-antibody complex immunotherapy. Allergy 1991;46:335348
  • 46
    Machiels JJ, Lebrun PM, Jacquemin MG, Saint-Remy JM. Significant reduction of nonspecific bronchial reactivity in patients with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus-sensitive allergic asthma under therapy with allergen-antibody complexes. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:14071412
  • 47
    Malling H-J. Diagnosis and immunotherapy of mould allergy. With special reference to Cladosporium herbarum. Dan Med Bull 1990;37:1222
  • 48
    Malling H-J, Dreborg S, Weeke B. Diagnosis and immunotherapy of mould allergy. V. Clinical efficacy and side effects of immunotherapy with Cladosporium herbarum. Allergy 1986;41:507519
  • 49
    Malling H-J, Dreborg S, Weeke B. Diagnosis and immunotherapy of mould allergy. VI. IgE-mediated parameters during a one-year placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy with Cladosporium. Allergy 1987;42:305314
  • 50
    Maunsell K, Wraith DG, Hughes AM. Hyposensitisation in mite asthma. Lancet 1971;1:967968
  • 51
    Mosbech H, Dreborg S, Frolund L, et al. Hyposensitisation in asthmatics with mPEG modified and unmodified house dust mite extract. I. Clinical effect evaluated by diary cards and a retrospective assessment. Allergy 1989;44:487498
  • 52
    Mosbech H, Dreborg S, Frolund L, et al. Hyposensitisation in asthmatics with mPEG modified and unmodified house dust mite extract. II. Effect evaluated by challenges with allergen and histamine. Allergy 1989;44:499509
  • 53
    Mosbech H, Dirkson A, Dreborg S, et al. Hyposensitization in asthmatics with mPEG-modified and unmodified house dust mite extract. IV. Occurrence and prediction of side effects. Allergy 1990;45:142150
  • 54
    Newton DAG, Maberly DJ, Wilson R. House dust mite hyposensitisation. Br J Dis Chest 1978;72:2128
  • 55
    Ohman JL, Findlay SR, Leitermann KM. Immunotherapy in cat induced asthma. Double blind trial with evaluation of in vivo and in vitro responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984;74:230239
  • 56
    Olsen OT, Larsen KR, Jacobsen L, Svendsen UG. A 1-year, placebo-controlled, double-blind house-dust-mite immunotherapy study in asthmatic adults. Allergy 1997;52:853859
  • 57
    Ortolani C, Pastorello E, Moss RB, et al. Grass pollen immunotherapy: a single year double blind placebo controlled study in patients with grass pollen induced asthma and rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984;73:283290
  • 58
    Paranos S, Petrovic S. Early effects of rush immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in asthmatics. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1997;7:588595
  • 59
    Pauli G, Bessot JC, Bigot H, et al. Clinical and immunologic evaluation of tyrosine adsorbed Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract: a double blind placebo controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984;74:524535
  • 60
    Pichler CE, Marquardsen A, Sparholt S, et al. Specific immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae results in decreased bronchial hyperreactivity. Allergy 1997;52:274283
  • 61
    Price JF, Warner JO, Hey EN, Turner MW, Soothill JF. A controlled trial of hyposensitisation with adsorbed tyrosine Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus antigen in childhood asthma: in vivo aspects. Clin Allergy 1984;14:209219
  • 62
    Reid MJ, Moss RB, Hsu YP, Kwasnicki JM, Commerford TM, Nelson BL. Seasonal asthma in northern California: allergic causes and efficacy of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;78:590600
  • 63
    Sabbah A, Bonnaud F, Sonneville A, Bonneau JC, Pinon H. Specific immunotherapy with delayed release D. pteronyssinus alpha fraction. A double blind study in asthma. Allerg Immunol (Paris) 1991;23:5860
  • 64
    Shaikh WA. Immunotherapy vs inhaled budesonide in bronchial asthma: an open, parallel, comparative trial. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27:12791284
  • 65
    Smith AP. Hyposensitisation with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus antigen: trial in asthma induced by house dust. BMJ 1971;4:204206
  • 66
    Sundin B, Lilja G, Graff-Lonnevig V, et al. Immunotherapy with partially purified and standardised animal dander extracts. I. Clinical results from a double blind study on patients with animal dander asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;77:478487
  • 67
    Taylor B, Sanders SS, Norman AP. A double blind controlled trial of house mite fortified house dust vaccine in childhood asthma. Clin Allergy 1974;4:3540
  • 68
    Taylor WW, Ohman JL, Lowell FC. Immunotherapy in cat induced asthma. Double blind trial with evaluation of bronchial responses to cat allergen and histamine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1978;61:283287
  • 69
    Torres Costa JC, Plácido JL, Moreira Silva JP, Delgardo L, Vaz M. Effects of immunotherapy on symptoms, PEFR, spirometry, and airway responsiveness in patients with allergic asthma to house-dust mites (D. pteronyssinus) on inhaled steroid therapy. Allergy 1996;51:238244
  • 70
    Valovirta E, Koivikko A, Vanto T, Viander M, Ingeman L. Immunotherapy in allergy to dog: a double blind clinical study. Ann Allergy 1984;53:8588
  • 71
    Valovirta E, Viander M, Koivikko A, Vanto T, Ingeman L. Immunotherapy in allergy to dog. Immunologic and clinical findings of a double-blind study. Ann Allergy 1986;57:173179
  • 72
    van Bever HP, Stevens WJ. Effect of hyposensitisation upon the immediate and late asthmatic reaction and upon histamine reactivity in patients allergic to house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus). Eur Respir J 1992;5:318322
  • 73
    van Metre TE, Marsh DG, Adkinson NF, et al. Immunotherapy for cat asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:10551068
  • 74
    Varney VA, Edwards J, Tabbah K, et al. Clinical efficacy of specific immunotherapy to cat dander: a double blind placebo controlled trial. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27:860867
  • 75
    Vooren PH. Double blind desensitization in asthma. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 1969;113:21272128
  • 76
    Warner JO, Price JF, Soothil JF, Hey EN. Controlled trial of hyposensitisation to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in children with asthma. Lancet 1978;2:912915
  • 77
    Adamek-Guzik T, Szczeklik A, Woloszynski J. Multicentre controlled trial of desensitisation treatment of pollen induced hay fever and asthma with pollinex vaccine. Pol Tyg Lek 1979;34:11111113
  • 78
    Almagro E, Asensio O, Bartolomé JM, et al. Multicentric study of pharmacovigilance of sublingual immunotherapy in allergic patients. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1995;23:153159
  • 79
    Andri L, Senna G, Andri G, et al. Local nasal immunotherapy for birch allergic rhinitis with extract in powder form. Clin Exp Allergy 1995;25:10921099
  • 80
    Ariano R, Panzani RC, Chiapella M, Augeri G, Falagiani P. Local immunotherapy of seasonal allergic rhinitis in children due to Parietaria officinalis pollen: a preliminary report. Pediatr Asthma Allergy Immunol 1993;7:227237
  • 81
    Armentia A, Arranz M, Martin JM, et al. Evaluation of immune complexes after immunotherapy with wheat flour in bakers' asthma. Ann Allergy 1992;69:441444
  • 82
    Astarita C, Scala G, Sproviero S, Franzese A. Effects of enzyme potentiated desensitisation in the treatment of pollinosis: a double blind placebo controlled trial. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1996;6:248255
  • 83
    Bessot JC, Delaume G, Meyer PD, Pauli G. Hyposensitization with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus tyrosine absorbate in bronchial asthma. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1980;8:351352
  • 84
    Botey J, Eseverri JL, Marin A, et al. Double blind trial of hyposensitization to Dermatophagoides farinae and D. pteronyssinus in asthmatic children. Allerg Immunol (Paris) 1981;13:1619
  • 85
    Bousquet J, Becker WM, Hejjaoui A, et al. Differences in clinical and immunologic reactivity of patients allergic to grass pollens and to multiple pollen species. II. Efficacy of a double blind placebo controlled specific immunotherapy with standardized extracts. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;88:4353
  • 86
    Bruun E. Control examination of the specificity of specific desensitisation in asthma. Acta Allergol 1949;2:122128
  • 87
    Choovoravech P. Effect of immunotherapy: treatment with mite and other aeroallergens in Thai allergic patients. J Med Assoc Thai 1980;63:506511
  • 88
    Choovoravech P, Yongpanich Y, Choovoravech N. Effect of immunotherapy in bronchial asthma: treatment with mite extract adsorbed on tyrosine. Curr Med Res Opin 1976;4:330339
  • 89
    Chu JC, Wun TH, Chen XJ. Treatment of asthmatic patients sensitive to mites (Dermatophagoides farinae); a four year study of immunotherapy with an extract of Dermatophagoides farinae. Ann Allergy 1981;47:107109
  • 90
    Clavel R, Bousquet J, André C. Clinical efficacy of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a standardized five-grass-pollen extract in rhinitis. Allergy 1998;53:493498
  • 91
    Cleveland CH, Metzger WJ. Immunotherapy with pollens and fungi. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 1992;12:3952
  • 92
    Cooper PJ, Darbyshire J, Nunn AJ, Warner JO. A controlled trial of oral hyposensitization in pollen asthma and rhinitis in children. Clin Allergy 1984;14:541550
  • 93
    Corbetta L, Pesiri P, Ferro G, Mander A. Improvement of fog and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction after local and subcutaneous immunotherapy in mite asthma. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1992;20:6166
  • 94
    Corrado OJ, Pastorello E, Ollier S, et al. A double-blind study of hyposensitization with an alginate conjugated extract of D. pteronyssinus (Conjuvac (R)) in patients with perennial rhinitis. I. Clinical aspects. Allergy 1989;44:108115
  • 95
    Crimi E, Voltolini S, Troise C, et al. Local immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides extract in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;87:721728
  • 96
    D'Amato G, Kordash TR, Liccardi G, et al. Immunotherapy with Alpare in patients with respiratory allergy to Parietaria pollen: a two year double blind placebo controlled study. Clin Exp Allergy 1995;25:149158
  • 97
    Des Roches A, Paradis L, Menardo J-L, Bouges S, Daures J-P, Bousquet J. Immunotherapy with a standardised Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. VI. Specific immunotherapy prevents the onset of new sensitisation in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;99:450453
  • 98
    Echechipia S, Tabar AI, Lobera T, et al. Immunotherapy with a standardised Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus glutaraldehyde modified extract against an unmodified extract: a comparative study of efficacy, tolerance and in vivo and in vitro modification of parameters. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1995;5:325332
  • 99
    Engström I, Kraepelien S. Specific desensitisation in bronchial asthma in childhood. Acta Paediatr 1957;46:8189
  • 100
    Eriksson NE, Ahlstedt S, Löwhagen O. Immunotherapy in spring-time hay fever. A clinical and immunological study comparing two different treatment extract compositions. Allergy 1979;34:233247
  • 101
    Fanti A, Coccoli M, Pompili T, et al. Randomized double-blind trial of a combination of cromoglycate disodium administration and specific desensitization treatment in adults with perennial extrinsic asthma and nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity. Lotta Contro la Tuberculosi e le Malattie Polmonari Sociali 1988;58:658663
  • 102
    Feliziani V, Lattuada G, Parmiani S, DallAglio PP. Safety and efficacy of sublingual rush immunotherapy with grass allergen extracts. A double blind study. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1995;23:224230
  • 103
    Ferreira N, Trindade JC. Specific immunotherapy 3 years follow-up in asthmatic children. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1993;21:185192
  • 104
    Formgren H, Lanner A, Lindholm N, Löwhagen O, Dreborg S. Effects of immunotherapy on specific and nonspecific sensitivity of the airways. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984;73:140
  • 105
    Garcia AN, Paris MB, Carballada F. Immunotherapy in infantile asthma. Pediatr Integral 1997;2:397404
  • 106
    Giovane AL, Bardare M, Passalacqua G, et al. A three-year double-blind placebo-controlled study with specific oral immunotherapy to Dermatophagoides: evidence of safety and efficacy in paediatric patients. Clin Exp Allergy 1994;24:5359
  • 107
    Goldstein GL, Chai H. Efficacy of rush immunotherapy in decreasing bronchial sensitivity to inhaled antigens in perennial childhood asthma. Ann Allergy 1981;47:333337
  • 108
    Goor W, Wïthrich B. Specific therapy of pollinosis. Results of desensitization with two different semi-depot allergen extracts (Allpyral and Suspal). Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1971;101:12171221
  • 109
    Gordon VH, Caplinger KJ, Meade JH, Thompson C. Correlation of type specific fluorescent antibodies to ragweed with symptomatology: double-blind study. Ann Allergy 1972;30:507517
  • 110
    Gozalo F, Martin S, Rico P, Alvarez E, Cortes C. Clinical efficacy and tolerance of two year Loliumperenne sublingual immunotherapy. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1997;25:219227
  • 111
    Grammer LC, Zeiss CR, Suszko IM, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of polymerized whole ragweed for immunotherapy of ragweed allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1982;69:494499
  • 112
    Grammer LC, Shaughnessy MA, Suszko IM, et al. A double-blind histamine placebo-controlled trial of polymerized whole grass for immunotherapy of grass allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1983;72:448453
  • 113
    Haahtela T, Wihl JÅ, Munch E, et al. Hyposensitization in hay fever with grass pollen extracts: a three-year study comparing a dialysed alum adsorbed extract with Allpyral(R). Ann Allergy 1984;52:355362
  • 114
    Haugaard L, Dahl R, Jacobsen L. A controlled dose-response study of immunotherapy with standardized, partially purified extract of house dust mite: clinical efficacy and side effects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1993;91:709722
  • 115
    Hedlin G, Heilborn H, Lilja G, et al. Long term follow-up of patients treated with a three year course of cat or dog immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;96:879885
  • 116
    Henocq E, Garcelon M, Berrens L. Photo-inactivated allergens. II. Clinical experience with house dust allergen in pulmonary function tests and in immunotherapy. Clin Allergy 1973;3:461469
  • 117
    Hirsch SR, Kalbfleisch JH, Cohen SH. Comparison of Rinkel injection therapy with standard immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1982;70:183190
  • 118
    Horst M, Hejjaoui A, Horst V, Michel FB, Bousquet J. Double blind placebo controlled rush immunotherapy with a standardised Alternaria extract. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;85:460472
  • 119
    Jacobsen L, Dreborg S, Moller C, et al. Immunotherapy as preventive allergy treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;97:232
  • 120
    Jarisch R, Sandor I, Gotz M, Krummer F. Immunotherapy of allergic disease: studies on 460 patients. Hautarzt 1979;30:365370
  • 121
    Kalla M, Rozniecki J, Polanska Z, Swatko A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of desensitisation in bronchial asthma caused by house dust mites or grass pollen in the light of clinical results and the histamine and polymyxin inhalation test. Pol Tyg Lek 1979;34:865868
  • 122
    Kang BC, Johnson J, Morgan C, Chang JL. The role of immunotherapy in cockroach asthma. J Asthma 1988;25:205218
  • 123
    Kozhemyaka AI, Solodun AK. Effectiveness of the specific hyposensitization of children with allergoses using a peroral vaccine from house dust. Pediatr Akusherstvo Ginekologiia 1979;3:57
  • 124
    Laetsch C, Wïthrich B. Towards the oral desensitization of inhalational allergies in childhood: treatment-results. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1973;103:342347
  • 125
    Leng X, Fu YX, Ye ST, Duan SQ. A double-blind trial of oral immunotherapy for Artemisia pollen asthma with evaluation of bronchial response to the pollen allergen and serum-specific IgE antibody. Ann Allergy 1990;64:2731
  • 126
    Levin SJ. Hyposensitising (immunising) injections in hay fever and asthma. Pediatr Clin North Am 1959;6:698708
  • 127
    Lichtenstein LM, Norman PS, Winkenwerder WL. A single year of immunotherapy for ragweed hay fever: immunologic and clinical studies. Ann Intern Med 1971;75:663
  • 128
    Lilja G, Sundin B, Graff Lonnevig V, et al. Immunotherapy with cat- and dog-dander extracts. IV. Effects of 2 years of treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:3744
  • 129
    Lu F-M, Chou C-C, Chiang B-L, Hsieh K-H. Immunologic changes during immunotherapy in asthmatic children: increased IL-13 and allergen-specific IgG4 antibody levels. Ann Allergy 1998;80:419423
  • 130
    Mallet A, Lluch M, Valero AL, Casanovas M. Clinical and immunological effects of immunotherapy with glutaraldehyde modified house dust mite extract. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1994;22:226232
  • 131
    Martorell Aragones A, Vila Martinez R, Colomer Sala J. Bronchial asthma. Clinical evolution with hyposensitization. Anales Espanoles Pediatr 1980;13:87100
  • 132
    Maruo H, Hashimoto K, Shimoda K, et al. Long-term follow up studies of bronchial asthma in children. II. Prognosis and complications, treatment and allergic evaluations. Arerugi 1990;39:662669
  • 133
    Matoga S, Scislicki A, Haluszka J, Kurzawa R. Results of immunotherapy with HDM (Bencard) in children with bronchial asthma. Pediatr Polska 1989;64:167172
  • 134
    Matsuoka H, Atsuta Y, Matsubara H, et al. Study of specific IgE and IgG4 antibodies to mite antigen in asthmatic children during immunotherapy. Allergol Int 1998;47:123128
  • 135
    McAllen MK, Heaf PJD, McInroy P. Depot grass pollen injections in asthma: effect of repeated treatment on clinical response and measured bronchial sensitivity. BMJ 1967;1:2225
  • 136
    Metzger WJ, Donnelly A, Richerson HB. Modification of late asthmatic responses during immunotherapy for Alternaria induced asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1983;71:119
  • 137
    Miguel Lozano R, Guerra Pasadas F, Arenas Vacas A, Daza Munoz JC. , Torres Murillo P, Sanchez Guijo P. Monitoring of various types of immunotherapy with gramineal pollens. I. Variation of clinical and biochemical parameters. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1992;20:230234
  • 138
    Mischler TW, O'Brien WM, Rugloski RJ, et al. A multiclinic trial with glutaraldehyde-modified tyrosine-adsorbed ragweed pollen immunotherapy (pollinex(R)). Curr Ther Res 1981;29:745756
  • 139
    Moller C, Dreborg S, Lanner A, Björkstén B. Oral immunotherapy of children with rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollen allergy. A double blind study. Allergy 1986;41:271279
  • 140
    Mosbech H. Who will benefit from hyposensitisation?. Allergy 1990;45:209212
  • 141
    Mosbech H, Dreborg S, Frolund L, et al. Immunotherapy with mPEG modified and unmodified D. pteronyssinus extract. Clinical results in a one year double-blind study. Ann Allergy 1985;55:389
  • 142
    Moscato G, Rossi G, Dellabianca A, Pisati A, Vinci G, Biale C. Local immunotherapy by inhalation of a powder extract in asthma due to house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus: a double-blind comparison with parenteral immunotherapy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1991;1:383394
  • 143
    Moshkevich VS. Local immunotherapy for chronic respiratory allergic pathology with allergen aerosols. II. Treatment of bronchial asthma. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1985;13:317321
  • 144
    Movérare R, Rak S, Elfman L. Allergen-specific increase in interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 secretion from peripheral blood mononuclear cells during birch-pollen immunotherapy. Allergy 1998;53:275281
  • 145
    Munoz Lejarazu D, Bernaola G, Fernandez E, et al. Seasonal versus perennial immunotherapy: evaluation after three years of treatment. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1993;3:210216
  • 146
    Munoz-Lopez F. Immunotherapy – methods of treatment and results in children. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1981;(Suppl 9):171173
  • 147
    Munoz-Lopez F, Martin Mateos A, Moreira A, Martinez Marin F. Topical nasal immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1994;22:132134
  • 148
    Munro-Ashman D, Frankland AW. Treatment of allergy to house dust with pyridine-extracted alum-precipitated extracts of the house dust mite. Ann Allergy 1976;36:9598
  • 149
    Murray AB, Ferguson AC, Morrison BJ. Non-allergic bronchial hyperreactivity in asthmatic children decreases with age and increases with mite immunotherapy. Ann Allergy 1985;54:541544
  • 150
    Nagata M, Tabe K, Yamamoto H, et al. The analysis of factors contributing to the safety and efficacy of rush immunotherapy in bronchial asthma. Arerugi 1993;42:628634
  • 151
    Nagata M, Yamamoto H, Tabe K, et al. Effect of rush immunotherapy in house-dust-mite (HDM)-sensitive adult bronchial asthma: changes in in vivo and in vitro responses to HDM. Int Med 1993;32:702709
  • 152
    Nagata M, Tabe K, Choo JH, Sakamoto Y, Matsuo H. Effect of immunotherapy on the production of eosinophil adhesion-inducing activity from mononuclear cells in house-dust-mite-sensitive bronchial asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1998;117 Suppl 1:2023
  • 153
    Norman PS, Lichtenstein LM. The clinical and immunologic specificity of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1978;61:370377
  • 154
    Novembre E, Marano E, Bernardini R, Caria M, Dini L, Vierucci A. Sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic asthma in children: a controlled study. Riv Ital Pediatr 1991;17:7578
  • 155
    Oda N, Yamashita N, Minoguchi K, et al. Long-term analysis of allergen-specific T cell clones from patients with asthma treated with allergen rush immunotherapy. Cell Immunol 1998;190:4350
  • 156
    Oppenheimer J, Areson JG, Nelson HS. Safety and efficacy of oral immunotherapy with standardized cat extract. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994;93:6167
  • 157
    Østerballe O. Immunotherapy with grass pollen major allergens. Allergy 1982;37:379388
  • 158
    Passalacqua G, Albano M, Fregonese L, et al. Randomised controlled trial of local allergoid immunotherapy on allergic inflammation in mite-induced rhinoconjunctivitis. Lancet 1998;351:629632
  • 159
    Paul K, Klettke U, Wahn U. The combined influence of immunotherapy and mite allergen reduction on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in mite-sensitive asthmatic children. Eur J Pediatr 1998;157:109113
  • 160
    Pence HL, Mitchell DQ, Greely RL, Updegraff BR, Selfridge HA. Immunotherapy for mountain cedar pollinosis: a double blind controlled study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1976;58:3950
  • 161
    Petersen BN, Janniche H, Munch EP, et al. Immunotherapy with partially purified and standardized tree pollen extracts. I. Clinical results from a three-year double-blind study of patients treated with pollen extracts either of birch or combinations of alder, birch and hazel. Allergy 1988;43:353362
  • 162
    Quirino T, Iemoli E, Siciliani E, Parmiani S, Milazzo F. Sublingual versus injective immunotherapy in grass pollen allergic patients: a double blind (double dummy) study. Clin Exp Allergy 1996;26:12531261
  • 163
    Rak S, Löwhagen O, Venge P. The effect of immunotherapy on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and eosinophilic cationic protein in pollen allergic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:470480
  • 164
    Rak S, Håkanson L, Venge P. Immunotherapy abrogates the generation of eosinophil and neutrophil chemotactic activity during pollen season. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;86:706713
  • 165
    Rak S, Ahlstedt S, Björkstén B, Fabbri L, Dahl R. Effects of immunotherapy on the inflammation in pollen asthma. Allergy 1993;48 Suppl 17:125128
  • 166
    Rak S, Hallden G, Sorenson S, Margari V, Scheynius A. The effect of immunotherapy on T-cell subsets in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in pollen-allergic patients. Allergy 1993;48:460465
  • 167
    Rebien W, Wahn U, Puttonen E, Maasch HJ. Comparative study on the immunological and clinical efficacy of oral and subcutaneous hyposensitization. Allergologie 1980;3:101106
  • 168
    Reilly DT, Taylor MA, Campbell J, et al. Is homoeopathy a placebo response? A controlled trial of homoeopathic immunotherapy (HIT) in atopic asthma. Complementary Ther Med 1993;1:2425
  • 169
    Reinert M, Biro G. Hyposensitization with tyrosine-allergoids. Prax Klin Pneumol 1981;35:7175
  • 170
    Reinert M, Reinert U. Oral hyposensitization with pollen solutions and placebos. Prax Klin Pneumol 1983;37:228231
  • 171
    Rocha EM. Effect of 2 therapeutic protocols in minor forms of respiratory allergy. Allerg Immunol (Paris) 1986;18:2941
  • 172
    Rohatgi N, Dunn K, Chai H. Cat or dog induced immediate and late asthmatic responses before and after immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:389
  • 173
    Rose G, Arlian L, Bernstein D, et al. Evaluation of household dust mite exposure and levels of specific IgE and IgG antibodies in asthmatic patients enrolled in a trial of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;97:10711078
  • 174
    Sadan N, Rhyne MB, Mellits ED, et al. Immunotherapy of pollinosis in children: investigation of the immunologic basis of clinical improvement. N Engl J Med 1969;280:623627
  • 175
    Sanchez Palacios A, Schamann Medina F, Lamas Rua-Figueroa A, Bosch Millares C, Ramos Santos S, Garcia Marrero JA. Comparative clinical-immunological study of oral and subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with extrinsic bronchial asthma. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1989;17:323329
  • 176
    Sanders S. The treatment of seasonal hay fever and asthma in children. A controlled trial of pre-seasonal depot pollen therapy. Practitioner 1966;196:811815
  • 177
    Saraclar Y, Sekerel BE, Kalayci O, Adalioglu G, Tuncer A. The effect of house dust mite specific immunotherapy on cysteinyl leukotriene production by blood leukocytes in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis and asthma. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1998;8:98104
  • 178
    Shen H. The mechanisms and clinical evaluation of allergen specific immunotherapy in patients with asthma. Respirology 1998;3(Suppl):A69
  • 179
    Simons FER, Imada M, Li Y, Watson WTA, HayGlass KT. Fel d 1 peptides: effect on skin tests and cytokine synthesis in cat-allergic human subjects. Int Immunol 1996;8:19371945
  • 180
    Swineford O, Cumbia JW, Berger KW, Lucas DC. Treatment of pollen hay fever and asthma with aerosols of pollen extracts. J Allergy 1955;26:305319
  • 181
    Sychlowy A, Lukas A, Nowak W, Maruszewski W. Treatment of asthma caused by house dust mites with a combination of Intal and vaccine adsorbed on tyrosine. Pediatr Pol 1979;54:12951298
  • 182
    Tari MG, Mancino M, Monti G. Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with rhinitis and asthma due to house dust mite. A double-blind study. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 1990;18:277284
  • 183
    Tari MG, Mancino M, Monti G. Immunotherapy by inhalation of allergen in powder in house dust allergic asthma – a double-blind study. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1992;2:5967
  • 184
    Taskapan O, Sener O, Ozanguc N. Effect of single allergen immunotherapy on early skin reactivity, symptom scores and total IgE levels in grass pollen allergics. Deri Hastaliklari Ve Frengi Arsivi 1998;32:164170
  • 185
    Taub SJ. Ragweed hay fever and asthma. Illinois Med J 1969;135:706707
  • 186
    Taudorf E, Weeke B. Orally administered grass pollen. Allergy 1983;38:561564
  • 187
    Taudorf E, Laursen LC, Djurup R, et al. Oral administration of grass pollen to hay fever patients. An efficacy study in oral hyposensitization. Allergy 1985;40:321335
  • 188
    Taudorf E, Laursen LC, Lanner A, et al. Oral immunotherapy in birch pollen hay fever. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987;80:153161
  • 189
    Tuchinda M, Chai H. Effect of immunotherapy in chronic asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1973;51:131138
  • 190
    Turner MW, Yalcin I, Soothill JF, et al. In vitro investigations in asthmatic children undergoing hyposensitization with tyrosine-adsorbed Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus antigen. Clin Allergy 1984;14:221231
  • 191
    Urbanek R, Gehl R. Efficacy of oral hyposensitization treatment in house dust mite allergy. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1982;130:150152
  • 192
    Valovirta E. Capacity of specific immunotherapy in prevention of allergic asthma in children: the preventive allergy treatment study (PAT). J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1997;7:369370
  • 193
    van Bever JP, Bosmans J, De Clerck LS, Stevens WJ. Modification of the late asthmatic reaction by hyposensitisation in asthmatic children allergic to house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) or grass pollen. Allergy 1988;43:378385
  • 194
    van Bever HP, Stevens WJ. Suppression of the late asthmatic reaction by hyposensitization in asthmatic children allergic to house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus). Clin Exp Allergy 1989;19:399404
  • 195
    van Bever HP, Stevens WJ. Evolution of the late asthmatic reaction during immunotherapy and after stopping immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;86:141146
  • 196
    van Bever HP, Vereecke IF, Bridts CH, De Clerck LS, Stevens WJ. Comparison between the in vitro cytokine production of mononuclear cells of young asthmatics with and without immunotherapy (IT). Clin Exp Allergy 1998;28:943949
  • 197
    Vourdas D, Syrigou E, Potamianou P, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized olive pollen extract in pediatric patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and mild asthma due to olive pollen sensitization. Allergy 1998;53:662672
  • 198
    Wahn U, Siraganian RP. Efficacy and specificity of immunotherapy with laboratory animal allergen extracts. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1980;65:413421
  • 199
    Wahn U, Schweter C, Lind P, Löwenstein H. Prospective study on immunologic changes induced by two different Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extracts prepared from whole mite culture and mite bodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:360370
  • 200
    Weyer A, Donat N, L'Heritier C, et al. Grass pollen hyposensitization versus placebo therapy. Allergy 1981;36:309
  • 201
    Wüthrich B, Hafner G. Pollinosis. II. Specific hyposensitisation: indications and results of treatment. A study with the allergen preparation StallergÉnes-Depot in the pollen seasons of 1976, 1977 and 1978. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1980;110:281290
  • 202
    CONSORT Group. Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996;276:637639
  • 203
    Weiner J, Abramson M, Puy R, Wilson J. Ragweed immunotherapy in adult asthma [Letter]. N Engl J Med 1996;335:203
  • 204
    Lockey RF. Adverse reactions associated with skin testing and immunotherapy. Allergy Proc 1995;16:293296
  • 205
    Specific allergen immunotherapy for asthma: a position paper of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy. Med J Aust 1997;167:540544