• 1
    Hunskaar S & Fosse RT. Allergy to laboratory mice and rats: a review of the pathophysiology, epidemiology and clinical aspects. Lab Anim 1990;24:358 374
  • 2
    Gordon S & Newman Taylor AJ. Animal, insect and shellfish allergy BernsteinIL, Chan-YeungM, MaloJ-L, BernsteinDI Asthma in the workplace. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999(in press)
  • 3
    Kibby T, Powell G, Cromer J. Allergy to laboratory animals: a prospective and cross-sectional study. J Occup Med 1989;31:842 846
  • 4
    Cullinan P, Lowson D, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ et al. Work related symptoms, sensitisation, and estimated exposure in workers not previously exposed to laboratory rats. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:589 592
  • 5
    Hollander A, Heederik D, Doekes G. Respiratory allergy to rats: exposure–response relationships in laboratory animal workers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:562 567
  • 6
    Davies GE, Thompson AV, Rackham M. Estimation of airborne rat-derived antigens by ELISA. J Immunoassay 1983;4:113 126
  • 7
    Corn M, Koegel A, Hall T, Scott A, Newill C, Evans R. Characteristics of airborne particles associated with animal allergy in laboratory workers. Ann Occup Hyg 1988;32 Suppl 1:435 446
  • 8
    Eggleston PA, Newill CA, Ansari AA et al. Task-related variation in airborne concentrations of laboratory animal allergens: studies with Rat n 1. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;84:347 352
  • 9
    Gordon S, Tee RD, Lowson D, Wallace J, Newman Taylor AJ. Reduction of airborne allergenic urinary proteins from laboratory rats. Br J Ind Med 1992;49:416 422
  • 10
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Gordon S, Harris J, Tee RD, Venables KM, Newman Taylor AJ. Determinants of airborne allergen exposure in an animal house. Occup Hyg 1995;1:317 324
  • 11
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Gordon S, Harris JM, Tee RD, Venables KM, Newman Taylor AJ. Variation in rat urinary aeroallergen levels explained by differences in site, task and exposure group. Ann Occup Hyg 1995;39:819 825
  • 12
    Gordon S, Wallace J, Cook A, Tee RD, Newman Taylor AJ. Reduction of exposure to laboratory animal allergens in the workplace. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27:744 751
  • 13
    Renström A, Larsson PH, Malmberg P, Bayard C. A new amplified monoclonal rat allergen assay used for evaluation of ventilation improvements in animal rooms. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:649 655
  • 14
    Platts-Mills TAE, Heyman PW, Longbottom JL, Wilkins SR. Airborne allergens associated with asthma: particle sizes carrying dust mite and rat allergens measured with a cascade impactor. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;77:850 857
  • 15
    Ohman JL, Hagberg K, MacDonald MR, Jones RR, Paigen BJ, Kacergis JB. Distribution of airborne mouse allergen in a major mouse breeding facility. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994;94:810 817
  • 16
    Renström A, Gordon S, Larsson PH, Tee RD, Newman Taylor AJ, Malmberg P. Comparison of a radioallergosorbent (RAST) inhibition method and a monoclonal enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for aeroallergen measurement. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27:1314 1321
  • 17
    Gordon S, Tee RD, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Lowson D, Harris J, Newman Taylor AJ. Measurement of airborne rat urinary allergen in an epidemiological study. Clin Exp Allergy 1994;24:1070 1077
  • 18
    Hollander A, Van Run P, Spithoven J, Doekes G, Heederik D. Exposure of laboratory animal workers to airborne rat and mouse urinary allergens. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27:616 626
  • 19
    Gordon S, Kiernan LA, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Cook AD, Tee RD, Newman Taylor AJ. Measurement of exposure to mouse urinary proteins in an epidemiological study. Occup Environ Med 1997;54:135 140
  • 20
    Renström A, Karlsson AS, Larsson PH, Malmberg P. High prevalence of symptoms and specific IgE to laboratory animal allergens in spite of low exposure among research personnel. Eur Respir J 1996;9 Suppl 23:120s
  • 21
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Gordon S, Tee RD, Venables KM, McDonald JC, Newman Taylor AJ. Exposure to dust and rat urinary aeroallergens in research establishments. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:593 597
  • 22
    Bland JM & Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307 310
  • 23
    Renström A, Gordon S, Hollander A et al. Comparison of methods to assess airborne rat and mouse allergen levels. II. Factors influencing antigen detection. Allergy 1999;54:150 157
  • 24
    Vaughan NP, Chalmers CP, Botham RA. Field comparison of personal samplers for inhalable dust. Ann Occup Hyg 1990;34:553 573
  • 25
    Kenny LC, Aitken R, Chalmers C et al. A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol samples performance. Ann Occup Hyg 1999;41:135 153
  • 26
    Gordon S, Tee RD, Lowson D, Newman Taylor AJ. Comparison and optimization of filter elution methods for the measurement of airborne allergen. Ann Occup Hyg 1992;36:575 587
  • 27
    Jensen J, Poulsen LK, Mygind K, Weeke ER, Weeke B. Immunochemical estimations of allergenic activities from outdoor aero-allergens collected by a high volume air sampler. Allergy 1989;44:52 59
  • 28
    Douwes JE, Versloot P, Hollander A, Heederik DJ, Doekes G. Influence of various dust sampling and extraction methods on the measurement of airborne endotoxin. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995;61:1763 1769
  • 29
    Zock J, Hollander A, Doekes G, Heederik D. The influence of different filter elution methods on the measurement of airborne potato antigens. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1996;57:567 570
  • 30
    Vittinghus E. Preanalytical handling of stored urine samples, and measurement of beta 2-microglobulin, orosomucoid, albumin, transferrin and immunoglobulin G in urine by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1990;50:843 849
  • 31
    Gordon S, Tee RD, Newman Taylor AJ. Analysis of the allergenic composition of rat dust. Clin Exp Allergy 1996;26:533 541