SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Johansson SGO, O'B Hourihane J, Bousquet J, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C, Dreborg S, Haahtela T, Kowalski ML, Mygind N, Ring J, Van Cauwenberge P, Van Hage-Hamsten M, Wüthrich B. A revised nomenclature for allergy. An EAACI position statement from the EAACI nomenclature task force. Allergy 2001;56:813824.
  • 2
    Robinson MK, Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, McNamee P, White IR, Basketter DA. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitisation risk. Contact Dermatitis 2000;42:251259.
  • 3
    Liden C. Legislative and preventive measures related to contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44:6569.
  • 4
    Goossens A, Beck MH, Haneke E, McFadden JP, Nolting S, Durupt G, Ries G. Adverse cutaneous reactions to cosmetic allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1999;40:112114.
  • 5
    De Groot AC. Contact Allergens. What's new? Cosmetic dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1996;15:485492.
  • 6
    De Groot AC. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to preservatives and fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 1999;41:224226.
  • 7
    De Groot AC, Van Ginkel CJW, Weyland JW. Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (Euxyl K 400): an important new allergen in cosmetics. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:743747.
  • 8
    Conde Salazar L, Baz M, Guimaraens D, Cannavo A. Contact dermatitis in hairdressers: patch test results in 379 hairdressers. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1995;7:109115.