Functional and morphological heterogeneity of emphysema and its implication for selection of patients for lung volume reduction surgery

Authors


  • This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Foundation (3200-043358; 95/1) and the Zürich Lung League.

  • Previous articles in this series: No. 1. E. Marchand, G. Gayan-Ramirez, P. De Leyn, M. Decramer. Physiological basis of improvement after lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema: where are we? Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 686–696. No. 2. W. Klepetko. Surgical aspects and techniques of lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema. Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 919–925. No. 3. H. Teschler, A.B. Thompson, G. Stamatis. Short- and long-term functional results after lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema. Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 1170–1176.

EW Russi
Pulmonary Division
University Hospital
Rämistr. 100
CH-8091 Zürich
Switzerland
Fax: 41 12554451

Abstract

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) in patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema aims to alleviate symptoms and enhance quality of life by improving respiratory mechanics.

The theoretical concepts of the operation predict the greatest functional benefit in patients with marked hyperinflation, and with airflow obstruction due to loss of elastic recoil.

Consistent observations in several centres, have confirmed these expectations. To achieve maximal reduction in lung volume at the least cost of functional tissue, resection is targeted to the lung zones with the most severe destruction by emphysema, leaving zones with relatively well-preserved tissue intact. Heterogeneity in emphysema distribution as assessed by visual scoring of the chest computed tomography scan according to a simple grading system has been shown to correlate with LVRS outcome variables.

Therefore, evaluation of lung volume reduction surgery candidates has to include the functional and morphological characteristics of the emphysema as well as a general assessment of perioperative risk. However, the knowledge of potential predictive factors of lung volume reduction surgery outcome is so far based on retrospective analysis of highly selected patients. Therefore, many questions in respect of the selection of ideal candidates for this procedure remain unanswered at the present time.

Ancillary