• 1
    Hjorth N. Fregert. Contact dermatitis. In: Rook, A Wilkinson, D S Ebling, F J G, eds. Textbook of Dermatology, Chapter 4. Oxford: Blackwell 1968.
  • 2
    Malten K E. Thoughts on irritant dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1981: 7: 238247.
  • 3
    Lammintausta K, Maibach H I. Irritant contact dermatitis. In: Dermatology, 3rd edn (SamuelL M, HarryJ H, eds). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co, Harcourt Brace, Jovanovinch Inc 1992, 425432.
  • 4
    NORA. Allergic and Irritant Dermatitis 11 June, 1999. Center for Disease Control 9 April 2002,
  • 5
    Wilkinson J D, Rycroft R J G. Contact dermatitis. In: Textbook of Dermatology, Vol. 1, 4th edn (RookA, WilkinsonD S, EblingF J G, eds) Oxford: Blackwell, 1986: 435532.
  • 6
    Lammintausta K, Maibach H I. Exogenous and endogenous factors in skin irritation. Int J Dermatol 1988: 27: 213222.
  • 7
    Mathias C G T, Maibach H I. Dermatoxicology monographs I. Cutaneous irritation: factors influencing the response to irritants. Clin Toxicolocy 1978: 13: 333346.
  • 8
    Wilheim K P, Maibach H. Factors predisposing cutaneous irritation. Dermatologic Clinics 1990: 8: 1722.
  • 9
    Berardesca E, Maibach H. Racial differences in skin pathophysiology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996: 34: 667672.
  • 10
    Berardesca E, De Rigal J, Leveque J L, Maibach H I. In vivo biophysical characterization of skin physiological differences in races. Dermatologica 1991: 182: 8993.
  • 11
    Benardesca E, Maibach H I. Contact dermatitis in blacks. Dermatologic Clinics 1988: 6: 363368.
  • 12
    Robinson M K. Population differences in skin structure and physiology and the susceptibility to irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: implications for skin safety testing and risk assessment. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 6579.
  • 13
    Marshal E K, Lynch V, Smith H W. On dichlorethylsulphide (mustard gas) II. Variations in susceptibility of the skin to dichlorethylsulphide. J Pharmacol Exp Therap 1919: 12: 291301.
  • 14
    Weigand D A, Mershon M M. The cutaneous irritant reaction to agent O-chlorobenzylidene (CS). Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report, MD, EB-TR-4332, February 1970.
  • 15
    Anderson K E, Maibach H I. Black and white human skin differences. J Am Acad Dermatol 1976: 1: 276282.
  • 16
    Buckley C E III, Lee K L, Burdick D S. Methacholine induced cutaneous flare response. bivariate analysis of responsiveness and sensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1982: 69: 2534.
  • 17
    Weigand D A, Gaylor J R. Irritant reaction in Negro and Caucasian skin. South Med J 1974: 67: 548551.
  • 18
    Thomson M L. Relative efficiency of pigment and horny layer thickness in protecting the skin of Europeans and Africans against solar ultraviolet radiation. J Physiol (Lond) 1955: 127: 236238.
  • 19
    Rienerston R P, Wheatley V R. Studies on the chemical composition of human epidermal lipids. J Invest Dermatol 1959: 32: 4951.
  • 20
    Corcuff P, Lotte C, Rougier A et al. Racial differences in corneocytes. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1991: 71: 146148.
  • 21
    Sugino K, Imokawa G, Maibach H. Ethnic difference of stratum corneum lipid in relation to stratum corneum function [Abstract]. J Invest Dermatol 1993: 100: 597.
  • 22
    Johnson L C, Corah N L. Racial differences in skin resistance. Science 1963: 139: 766769.
  • 23
    Flusher J W, Kuss O, Diepgen T et al. Testing for irritation with a multifactorial approach: comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques of five different irritation types. Br J Dermatol 2001: 145: 696703.
  • 24
    Berardesca E, Maibach H I. Racial difference in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 6570.
  • 25
    Gean C J, Tur E, Maibach H I, Guy Rh. Cutaneous responses to topical methyl nicotinate in black, oriental, and Caucasian subjects. Arch Dermatol Res 1989: 281: 9598.
  • 26
    Guy Rh, Tur E, Bjerke S, Maibach H I. Are there age and racial differences to methyl nicotinate-induced vasodilation in human skin? J Am Acad Dermatol 1985: 12: 10011006.
  • 27
    Berardesca E, Maibach H I. Cutaneous reactive hyperaemia: racial differences induced by corticoid application. Br J Dermatol 1989: 120: 787794.
  • 28
    Rapaport M. Patch testing in Japanese subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 9397.
  • 29
    Basketter D A, Griffith H A, Wang X A, Wilhelm K P, McFadden J. Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 35: 208213.
  • 30
    Goh C L, Chia S E. Skin irritability to sodium lauryl sulphate—as measured by skin water loss—by sex and race. Clin Exp Dermatol 1988: 13: 1619.
  • 31
    Foy V, Weinkauf R, Whittle E, Basketter D A. Ethnic variation in the skin irritation response. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 346349.
  • 32
    Robinson M K. Racial differences in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses between Caucasian and Asian populations. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 134143.
  • 33
    Robinson M K, Perkins M A, Basketter D A. Application of a 4-h human test patch method for comparative and investigative assessment of skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 38: 194202.
  • 34
    Robinson M K. Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 8692.
  • 35
    Robinson M K. Intra-individual variations in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 7583.
  • 36
    Judge M R, Griffith H A, Basketter D A, White I R, Rycroft R J G, McFadden J P. Variations in response of human skin to irritant challenge. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 115117.
  • 37
    McFadden J P, Wakelin Sh, Basketter D A. Acute irritation thresholds in subjects with type I–type VI skin. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 38: 147149.