Ruminant diversification as an adaptation to the physicomechanical characteristics of forage.
A reevaluation of an old debate and a new hypothesis
Article first published online: 4 JUL 2003
Volume 102, Issue 2, pages 253–262, August 2003
How to Cite
Clauss, M., Lechner-Doll, M. and Streich, W. J. (2003), Ruminant diversification as an adaptation to the physicomechanical characteristics of forage. Oikos, 102: 253–262. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12406.x
- Issue published online: 4 JUL 2003
- Article first published online: 4 JUL 2003
- Manuscript Accepted 19 February 2003
The validity of Hofmann's classification of ruminants into browsers/“concentrate selectors”, intermediate feeders and grazers/“grass and roughage eaters” and of his consecutive physiological postulates has repeatedly been questioned. In contrast to former concepts, which all focused on the chemical characteristics of the respective forages, we propose a new hypothesis on the main driving force of ruminant diversification, namely the physicomechanical characteristics of the respective forages. In contrast to browse, grass tends to stratify and form a “fibrous raft” in the reticulorumen. The significantly more capacious forestomachs of grazers, and the significantly thicker rumen pillars (indicating the strength of reticulorumen muscle equipment) of their forestomachs, are interpreted as particular adaptations to this forage characteristic. With these parameters, we present, for the first time, two single morphological measurements that allow the statistical reconstruction of Hofmann's classification. A small forestomach capacity and the lack of strong reticulorumen muscles in browsers would explain the observed exclusiveness with which browsers avoid grass forage under natural conditions, which we confirmed using two datasets on the composition of the natural diet. Both rumen pillar thickness and relative forestomach capacity were significantly correlated to the grass content of the natural diet, respectively. Our functional interpretation was also supported by a stepwise regression analysis with the proportion of grass in the natural diet as dependent variable and the rumen pillar thickness, the relative forestomach capacity, and the body weight as independent variables, which revealed significant equations.